Suppr超能文献

动物源临床分离大肠埃希菌抗菌药物敏感性检测方法的比较

Relative performance of antimicrobial susceptibility assays on clinical Escherichia coli isolates from animals.

机构信息

School of Animal and Veterinary Sciences, The University of Adelaide, Roseworthy Campus, Mudla Wirra Rd., Roseworthy, 5371, Australia; School of Veterinary and Life Sciences, Murdoch University, 90 South Street, Murdoch, Perth, Western Australia, 6150, Australia.

School of Animal and Veterinary Sciences, The University of Adelaide, Roseworthy Campus, Mudla Wirra Rd., Roseworthy, 5371, Australia.

出版信息

Vet Microbiol. 2018 Feb;214:56-64. doi: 10.1016/j.vetmic.2017.12.008. Epub 2017 Dec 12.

Abstract

The assessment of antimicrobial resistance in bacteria derived from animals is often performed using the disc diffusion assay. However broth-microdilution is the preferred assay for national antimicrobial resistance surveillance programs. This study aimed to evaluate the accuracy of disc diffusion relative to broth-microdilution across a panel of 12 antimicrobials using data from a collection of 994 clinical Escherichia coli isolates from animals. Disc diffusion performance was evaluated by diagnostic sensitivity, specificity, likelihood ratio pairs and receive-operating characteristic (ROC) analysis. Data was dichotomised using CLSI susceptible and resistant clinical breakpoints. In addition, disc diffusion breakpoints produced using diffusion Breakpoint Estimation Testing Software (dBETS) were evaluated. Analysis revealed considerable variability in performance estimates for disc diffusion susceptible and resistant breakpoints (AUC ranges: 0.78-0.99 and 0.92-1.0, respectively) across the panel of antimicrobials. Ciprofloxacin, tetracycline, and ampicillin estimates were robust across both breakpoints, whereas estimates for several antimicrobials including amoxicillin-clavulanic acid, cefoxitin and gentamicin were less favourable using susceptible breakpoints. Overall performance estimates were moderately improved when dBETS susceptible breakpoints were applied. For most antimicrobials, disc diffusion was accurate at predicting resistance of clinical E. coli from animals that could otherwise be determined by broth-microdilution. While disc diffusion is suboptimal for assessing the proportion of fully susceptible isolates for some drugs, sensitivity and specificity estimates provided here allow for the use of standard formula to correct this. For this reason, disc diffusion has applicability in national surveillance provided the performance of the assay is taken into account.

摘要

评估动物源细菌的抗菌药物耐药性时,通常采用纸片扩散法。然而,肉汤微量稀释法是国家抗菌药物耐药性监测计划首选的检测方法。本研究旨在使用来自动物源临床大肠杆菌分离株的 994 份数据,评估纸片扩散法相对肉汤微量稀释法检测 12 种抗菌药物的准确性。通过诊断灵敏度、特异性、似然比对和接收者操作特征(ROC)分析评估纸片扩散法的性能。使用 CLSI 敏感和耐药临床折点对数据进行二分类。此外,还评估了使用扩散断点估计测试软件(dBETS)生成的纸片扩散断点。分析表明,在整个抗菌药物检测面板中,纸片扩散法的敏感和耐药折点的性能估计存在相当大的差异(AUC 范围分别为 0.78-0.99 和 0.92-1.0)。环丙沙星、四环素和氨苄西林的估计值在两个折点上均具有稳健性,而阿莫西林-克拉维酸、头孢西丁和庆大霉素等几种抗菌药物的估计值在使用敏感折点时则不太理想。当应用 dBETS 敏感折点时,总体性能估计值得到适度提高。对于大多数抗菌药物,纸片扩散法可准确预测动物源临床大肠杆菌的耐药性,而这可以通过肉汤微量稀释法来确定。虽然纸片扩散法在评估某些药物完全敏感分离株的比例方面不太理想,但此处提供的敏感性和特异性估计值允许使用标准公式进行校正。因此,只要考虑到检测方法的性能,纸片扩散法在国家监测中具有适用性。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验