• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

早期高压氧治疗对糖尿病性脑出血潜在的长期神经功能改善作用。

The potential long-term neurological improvement of early hyperbaric oxygen therapy on hemorrhagic stroke in the diabetics.

机构信息

Department of Brain Surgery, Ningbo Zhenhai People Hospital (Ningbo Seventh Hospital), Zhejiang 315202, China.

出版信息

Diabetes Res Clin Pract. 2018 Apr;138:75-80. doi: 10.1016/j.diabres.2018.01.017. Epub 2018 Feb 3.

DOI:10.1016/j.diabres.2018.01.017
PMID:29408705
Abstract

AIMS

Although Hyperbaric oxygen therapy (HyperBOT) attract our attention successfully these days, it is still full of controversy on the treatment of acute stroke. The aim of this study is to assess the potential long-term neurological consequences and safety of using HyperBOT on intracerebral hemorrhage (ICH) in the diabetics.

METHODS

In this prospective, randomized controlled trial, 79 diabetes patients suffering from acute ICH were randomized to treat for 60 min in a monoplace hyperbaric chamber pressurized with pure oxygen to 2.5-atm absolute (ATA) in the HyperBOT group or 1.5 ATA in the normobaric oxygen therapy (NormBOT) group, which was performed as control. Both short-term and long-term neurological consequences were studied and compared in each group on National Institutes of Health Stroke Scale [NIHSS], Barthel Index, modified Rankin Scale [mRS] and Glasgow Outcome Scale [GOS]. The related complications or side-events of all patients were recorded as well at the final follow-up of six months after onset.

RESULTS

No distinct difference was observed between each group at one month follow-up. However, in the long-term follow-up of six months, a higher frequency of patients in the HyperBOT group resulted into good outcome with a relative high neurological consequence compared with the NormBOT group (Barthel Index: 85.1% versus 65.6%, P = 0.080; mRS: 89.4% versus 68.8%, P = 0.045; GOS: 83.0% versus 62.5%, P = 0.073; NIHSS: 80.9% versus 56.2%, P = 0.035).

CONCLUSIONS

Early HyperBOT was found to be safe and effective with regards to the long-term neurological outcome of diabetic patients suffering from ICH.

摘要

目的

尽管高压氧治疗(HyperBOT)近来备受关注,但在急性脑卒中的治疗方面仍存在诸多争议。本研究旨在评估糖尿病患者颅内出血(ICH)使用 HyperBOT 的潜在长期神经后果和安全性。

方法

在这项前瞻性、随机对照试验中,79 名患有急性 ICH 的糖尿病患者被随机分为 HyperBOT 组和常压氧疗(NormBOT)组,每组 39 例。HyperBOT 组在单舱高压氧舱中用纯氧加压至 2.5 绝对大气压(ATA)治疗 60 分钟,NormBOT 组在 1.5ATA 下治疗,作为对照。分别在每个组中使用国立卫生研究院卒中量表(NIHSS)、巴氏指数、改良 Rankin 量表(mRS)和格拉斯哥结局量表(GOS)评估短期和长期神经后果。并在发病后 6 个月的最终随访时记录所有患者的相关并发症或不良事件。

结果

在一个月的随访中,两组之间没有明显差异。然而,在 6 个月的长期随访中,HyperBOT 组有更多的患者神经后果较好,与 NormBOT 组相比结果更优(巴氏指数:85.1%比 65.6%,P=0.080;mRS:89.4%比 68.8%,P=0.045;GOS:83.0%比 62.5%,P=0.073;NIHSS:80.9%比 56.2%,P=0.035)。

结论

早期 HyperBOT 被发现对糖尿病患者 ICH 的长期神经预后是安全有效的。

相似文献

1
The potential long-term neurological improvement of early hyperbaric oxygen therapy on hemorrhagic stroke in the diabetics.早期高压氧治疗对糖尿病性脑出血潜在的长期神经功能改善作用。
Diabetes Res Clin Pract. 2018 Apr;138:75-80. doi: 10.1016/j.diabres.2018.01.017. Epub 2018 Feb 3.
2
Hyperbaric oxygen therapy in acute ischemic stroke: results of the Hyperbaric Oxygen in Acute Ischemic Stroke Trial Pilot Study.急性缺血性卒中的高压氧治疗:急性缺血性卒中试验试点研究中高压氧治疗的结果
Stroke. 2003 Feb;34(2):571-4. doi: 10.1161/01.str.0000050644.48393.d0.
3
Hyperbaric-Oxygen Therapy Improves Survival and Functional Outcome of Acute Severe Intracerebral Hemorrhage.高压氧治疗改善急性重症脑出血的生存和功能结局。
Arch Med Res. 2017 Oct;48(7):638-652. doi: 10.1016/j.arcmed.2018.03.001. Epub 2018 Mar 13.
4
Association between disability measures and short-term health care costs following intracerebral hemorrhage.脑出血后残疾测量指标与短期医疗费用之间的关联。
Neurocrit Care. 2008;9(3):313-8. doi: 10.1007/s12028-008-9124-5. Epub 2008 Aug 12.
5
A prospective, randomized Phase II clinical trial to evaluate the effect of combined hyperbaric and normobaric hyperoxia on cerebral metabolism, intracranial pressure, oxygen toxicity, and clinical outcome in severe traumatic brain injury.一项前瞻性、随机的 II 期临床试验,旨在评估高压和常压联合高氧对严重创伤性脑损伤患者脑代谢、颅内压、氧毒性和临床结局的影响。
J Neurosurg. 2013 Jun;118(6):1317-28. doi: 10.3171/2013.2.JNS121468. Epub 2013 Mar 19.
6
Increased circulating endothelial progenitor cells and improved short-term outcomes in acute non-cardioembolic stroke after hyperbaric oxygen therapy.高压氧治疗后急性非心源性卒中患者循环内皮祖细胞增加和短期预后改善。
J Transl Med. 2018 Sep 12;16(1):255. doi: 10.1186/s12967-018-1629-x.
7
Hyperbaric oxygen in the treatment of acute ischemic stroke. A double-blind pilot study.高压氧治疗急性缺血性脑卒中:一项双盲试验研究
Stroke. 1995 Aug;26(8):1369-72. doi: 10.1161/01.str.26.8.1369.
8
The effect of normobaric oxygen in patients with acute stroke: a systematic review and meta-analysis.常压氧对急性卒中患者的影响:一项系统评价与荟萃分析。
Neurol Res. 2018 Jun;40(6):433-444. doi: 10.1080/01616412.2018.1454091. Epub 2018 Mar 30.
9
Safety and efficacy of normobaric oxygenation on rescuing acute intracerebral hemorrhage-mediated brain damage-a protocol of randomized controlled trial.常压氧疗抢救急性脑出血性脑损伤的安全性和有效性:一项随机对照试验方案。
Trials. 2021 Jan 26;22(1):93. doi: 10.1186/s13063-021-05048-4.
10
Effects of Normobaric Hyperoxia in Severe Acute Stroke: a Randomized Controlled Clinical Trial Study.常压高氧对重症急性卒中的影响:一项随机对照临床试验研究。
Acta Med Iran. 2015 Nov;53(11):676-80.

引用本文的文献

1
Research progress on high-concentration oxygen therapy after cerebral hemorrhage.脑出血后高浓度氧疗的研究进展
Front Neurol. 2024 Jul 29;15:1410525. doi: 10.3389/fneur.2024.1410525. eCollection 2024.
2
Effects of Dexmedetomidine Combined with Intravenous Anesthesia on Oxidative Stress Index, Postoperative Sleep Quality, and Brain Function in HICH Patients.右美托咪定联合静脉麻醉对 HICH 患者氧化应激指标、术后睡眠质量及脑功能的影响。
J Healthc Eng. 2022 Mar 19;2022:5463986. doi: 10.1155/2022/5463986. eCollection 2022.
3
A review on the neuroprotective effects of hyperbaric oxygen therapy.
高压氧治疗的神经保护作用综述。
Med Gas Res. 2021 Apr-Jun;11(2):72-82. doi: 10.4103/2045-9912.311498.