• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

芬兰语版足踝视觉模拟量表(VAS-FA)的信度和效度。

Reliability and validity of the Finnish version of the Visual Analogue Scale Foot and Ankle (VAS-FA).

作者信息

Repo Jussi P, Tukiainen Erkki J, Roine Risto P, Kautiainen Hannu, Lindahl Jan, Ilves Outi, Järvenpää Salme, Häkkinen Arja

机构信息

Department of Plastic Surgery, University of Helsinki and Helsinki University Hospital, HUS, Finland.

Department of Plastic Surgery, University of Helsinki and Helsinki University Hospital, HUS, Finland.

出版信息

Foot Ankle Surg. 2018 Dec;24(6):474-480. doi: 10.1016/j.fas.2017.05.009. Epub 2017 Jun 7.

DOI:10.1016/j.fas.2017.05.009
PMID:29409192
Abstract

BACKGROUND

There have previously been no validated foot and ankle-specific patient-reported outcome measures in Finnish.

METHODS

The Visual Analogue Scale Foot and Ankle (VAS-FA) was translated and adapted into Finnish. Thereafter, 165 patients who had undergone foot and ankle surgery completed a questionnaire set on two separate occasions. Analyses included testing of floor-ceiling effect, internal consistency, reproducibility, and validity.

RESULTS

Minor linguistic differences emerged during the translation. Some structural adjustments were made. The mean (SD) total VAS-FA score was 74 (23). In the three subscales, maximum scores were noted in 2-5% of the responses, and internal consistency ranged from 0.81 to 0.94. Reproducibility was excellent (ICC, 0.97). The total VAS-FA score correlated significantly with the Lower Extremity Functional Scale (r=0.84) and the 15D Mobility dimension (r=0.79). The VAS-FA loaded on two factors (pain/movement and problems/limitations).

CONCLUSIONS

The Finnish version of the VAS-FA has high reliability and strong validity.

摘要

背景

此前芬兰语中尚无经过验证的足踝特异性患者报告结局指标。

方法

将视觉模拟量表足踝版(VAS-FA)翻译并改编为芬兰语版本。此后,165例接受足踝手术的患者分两次完成了一套问卷。分析包括地板效应和天花板效应测试、内部一致性、可重复性和效度。

结果

翻译过程中出现了一些细微的语言差异。进行了一些结构调整。VAS-FA总分的均值(标准差)为74(23)。在三个子量表中,2%-5%的回答为满分,内部一致性范围为0.81至0.94。可重复性极佳(组内相关系数,0.97)。VAS-FA总分与下肢功能量表(r = 0.84)和15D移动维度(r = 0.79)显著相关。VAS-FA归为两个因子(疼痛/活动和问题/限制)。

结论

芬兰语版VAS-FA具有高可靠性和强效度。

相似文献

1
Reliability and validity of the Finnish version of the Visual Analogue Scale Foot and Ankle (VAS-FA).芬兰语版足踝视觉模拟量表(VAS-FA)的信度和效度。
Foot Ankle Surg. 2018 Dec;24(6):474-480. doi: 10.1016/j.fas.2017.05.009. Epub 2017 Jun 7.
2
Assessment of the structural validity of three foot and ankle specific patient-reported outcome measures.评估三种足部和踝关节特定的患者报告结局测量工具的结构有效性。
Foot Ankle Surg. 2020 Feb;26(2):169-174. doi: 10.1016/j.fas.2019.01.009. Epub 2019 Feb 1.
3
Validation of the Western Ontario and McMaster Universities Osteoarthritis Index in Patients Having Undergone Ankle Fracture Surgery.西安大略和麦克马斯特大学骨关节炎指数在踝关节骨折手术患者中的验证
J Foot Ankle Surg. 2019 Nov;58(6):1100-1107. doi: 10.1053/j.jfas.2019.01.018. Epub 2019 Sep 6.
4
Validity and Reliability of Visual Analog Scale Foot and Ankle: The Turkish Version.视觉模拟量表在足踝部应用的效度与信度:土耳其语版本
J Foot Ankle Surg. 2017 Nov-Dec;56(6):1213-1217. doi: 10.1053/j.jfas.2017.06.001. Epub 2017 Aug 30.
5
Reliability and validity of the Finnish version of the Lower Extremity Functional Scale (LEFS).芬兰语版下肢功能量表(LEFS)的信度和效度
Disabil Rehabil. 2017 Jun;39(12):1228-1234. doi: 10.1080/09638288.2016.1193230. Epub 2016 Jul 6.
6
Minimal important change for the visual analogue scale foot and ankle (VAS-FA).足踝视觉模拟量表(VAS-FA)的最小重要变化。
Foot Ankle Surg. 2021 Feb;27(2):196-200. doi: 10.1016/j.fas.2020.04.005. Epub 2020 Apr 27.
7
Reliability, validity and responsiveness of the German Manchester-Oxford Foot Questionnaire (MOXFQ) in patients with foot or ankle surgery.德国版曼彻斯特-牛津足部问卷(MOXFQ)在足踝手术患者中的信度、效度及反应度
Foot Ankle Surg. 2018 Dec;24(6):481-485. doi: 10.1016/j.fas.2017.05.007. Epub 2017 Jun 13.
8
Validity, reliability, and responsiveness of the Korean version of American Academy of Orthopedic Surgeons Foot and Ankle questionnaire.美国矫形外科医师学会足踝问卷韩文版的效度、信度和反应度
J Foot Ankle Surg. 2015 Jan-Feb;54(1):46-50. doi: 10.1053/j.jfas.2014.08.011. Epub 2014 Oct 16.
9
Comparison of the Manchester-Oxford Foot Questionnaire (MOXFQ) and the Self-Reported Foot and Ankle Outcome Score (SEFAS) in patients with foot or ankle surgery.足踝手术患者中曼彻斯特-牛津足部问卷(MOXFQ)与自我报告的足踝结局评分(SEFAS)的比较。
Foot Ankle Surg. 2019 Jun;25(3):361-365. doi: 10.1016/j.fas.2018.01.003. Epub 2018 Feb 9.
10
Visual analogue scale foot and ankle: validity and reliability of Thai version of the new outcome score in subjective form.视觉模拟量表(足踝部):泰语版新主观形式结局评分的有效性和可靠性
J Med Assoc Thai. 2011 Aug;94(8):952-7.

引用本文的文献

1
Innovative approaches in the treatment of chronic plantar fasciitis: comparison of pulsed radiofrequency ablation and surgical intervention.创新性治疗慢性足底筋膜炎的方法:脉冲射频消融与手术干预的比较。
Int Orthop. 2024 Oct;48(10):2719-2726. doi: 10.1007/s00264-024-06261-x. Epub 2024 Jul 31.
2
Transcultural Adaptation and Validation of the Spanish Version of the Visual Analogue Scale for the Foot and Ankle (VASFA).足踝视觉模拟量表(VASFA)西班牙语版本的跨文化调适与验证
J Clin Med. 2023 Dec 29;13(1):213. doi: 10.3390/jcm13010213.
3
Ankle fractures: a systematic review of patient-reported outcome measures and their measurement properties.
踝关节骨折:患者报告结局测量及其测量特性的系统评价。
Qual Life Res. 2023 Jan;32(1):27-45. doi: 10.1007/s11136-022-03166-3. Epub 2022 Jun 18.
4
Outcomes after nonoperatively treated non-displaced Lisfranc injury: a retrospective case series of 55 patients.未经手术治疗的无移位 Lisfranc 损伤的结果:55 例回顾性病例系列。
Arch Orthop Trauma Surg. 2021 Aug;141(8):1311-1317. doi: 10.1007/s00402-020-03599-w. Epub 2020 Sep 22.
5
Nonoperative, open reduction and internal fixation or primary arthrodesis in the treatment of Lisfranc injuries: a prospective, randomized, multicenter trial - study protocol.非手术治疗、切开复位内固定或一期关节融合术治疗Lisfranc损伤:一项前瞻性、随机、多中心试验——研究方案
BMC Musculoskelet Disord. 2018 Aug 21;19(1):301. doi: 10.1186/s12891-018-2222-4.