Suppr超能文献

使用Lisfranc钢板与经关节螺钉固定稳定性的生物力学比较。

Biomechanical comparison of fixation stability using a Lisfranc plate versus transarticular screws.

作者信息

Ho Nathan C, Sangiorgio Sophia N, Cassinelli Spenser, Shymon Stephen, Fleming John, Agrawal Virat, Ebramzadeh Edward, Harris Thomas G

机构信息

The J. Vernon Luck, Sr., M.D. Orthopaedic Research Center, Orthopaedic Institute for Children, in Alliance with UCLA, 403 W. Adams Blvd., Los Angeles, CA 90007, United States; University of Southern California Department of Biomedical Engineering, Los Angeles, CA, United States.

The J. Vernon Luck, Sr., M.D. Orthopaedic Research Center, Orthopaedic Institute for Children, in Alliance with UCLA, 403 W. Adams Blvd., Los Angeles, CA 90007, United States; University of California, Los Angeles Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Los Angeles, CA, United States.

出版信息

Foot Ankle Surg. 2019 Feb;25(1):71-78. doi: 10.1016/j.fas.2017.08.004. Epub 2017 Aug 23.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

To obtain adequate fixation in treating Lisfranc soft tissue injuries, the joint is commonly stabilized using multiple transarticular screws; however iatrogenic injury is a concern. Alternatively, two parallel, longitudinally placed plates, can be used to stabilize the 1st and 2nd tarsometatarsal joints; however this may not provide adequate stability along the Lisfranc ligament. Several biomechanical studies have compared earlier methods of fixation using plates to the standard transarticular screw fixation method, highlighting the potential issue of transverse stability using plates. A novel dorsal plate is introduced, intended to provide transverse and longitudinal stability, without injury to the articular cartilage.

METHODS

A biomechanical cadaver model was developed to compare the fixation stability of a novel Lisfranc plate to that of traditional fixation, using transarticular screws. Thirteen pairs of cadaveric specimens were tested intact, after a simulated Lisfranc injury, and then following implant fixation, using one method of fixation randomly assigned, on either side of each pair. Optical motion tracking was used to measure the motion between each of the following four bones: 1st metatarsal, 2nd metatarsal, 1st cuneiform, and 2nd cuneiform. Testing included both cyclic abduction loading and cyclic axial loading.

RESULTS

Both the Lisfranc plate and screw fixation method provided stability such that the average 3D motions across the Lisfranc joint (between 2nd metatarsal and 1st cuneiform), were between 0.2 and 0.4mm under cyclic abduction loading, and between 0.4 and 0.5mm under cyclic axial loading. Comparing the stability of fixation between the Lisfranc plate and the screws, the differences in motion were all 0.3mm or lower, with no clinically significant differences (p>0.16).

CONCLUSIONS

Diastasis at the Lisfranc joint following fixation with a novel plate or transarticular screw fixation were comparable. Therefore, the Lisfranc plate may provide adequate support without risk of iatrogenic injury to the articular cartilage.

摘要

背景

为了在治疗Lisfranc软组织损伤时获得足够的固定,通常使用多根经关节螺钉来稳定关节;然而,医源性损伤是一个令人担忧的问题。另外,可使用两块平行纵向放置的钢板来稳定第一和第二跗跖关节;然而,这可能无法沿Lisfranc韧带提供足够的稳定性。多项生物力学研究将早期使用钢板的固定方法与标准经关节螺钉固定方法进行了比较,突出了使用钢板时横向稳定性的潜在问题。现引入一种新型背侧钢板,旨在提供横向和纵向稳定性,同时不损伤关节软骨。

方法

建立生物力学尸体模型,以比较新型Lisfranc钢板与传统经关节螺钉固定方法的固定稳定性。对13对尸体标本先进行完整测试,然后模拟Lisfranc损伤,之后随机分配一种固定方法在每对标本的两侧进行植入固定。使用光学运动跟踪技术测量以下四块骨头之间的运动:第一跖骨、第二跖骨、第一楔骨和第二楔骨。测试包括循环外展加载和循环轴向加载。

结果

Lisfranc钢板和螺钉固定方法均提供了稳定性,使得在循环外展加载下,Lisfranc关节(第二跖骨和第一楔骨之间)的平均三维运动在0.2至0.4毫米之间,在循环轴向加载下在0.4至0.5毫米之间。比较Lisfranc钢板和螺钉的固定稳定性,运动差异均在0.3毫米或更低,无临床显著差异(p>0.16)。

结论

新型钢板固定或经关节螺钉固定后Lisfranc关节的分离情况相当。因此,Lisfranc钢板可能提供足够的支撑,而无关节软骨医源性损伤的风险。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验