• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

非即刻药物过敏反应与药物暴露的关联性:来自突尼斯药物警戒数据库自发报告的病例对照分析。

Association of non-immediate drug hypersensitivity with drug exposure: A case control analysis of spontaneous reports from a Tunisian pharmacovigilance database.

机构信息

Department of Pharmacology, University of Medicine, Monastir, Tunisia.

Department of Pharmacology, University of Medicine, Monastir, Tunisia.

出版信息

Eur J Intern Med. 2018 Jul;53:40-44. doi: 10.1016/j.ejim.2018.01.032. Epub 2018 Mar 2.

DOI:10.1016/j.ejim.2018.01.032
PMID:29409745
Abstract

PURPOSE

To assess delayed-type cutaneous reactions (DTCRs) related to drugs, using a case-control approach to qualify drug risks.

METHODS

The study used the Tunisian pharmacovigilance database of Monastir. The association between drugs and DTCRs was assessed using a case/non-case method. Drugs were grouped according to the ATC Classification System. Patients were defined as "cases" if they have developed DTCRs regardless of the causality assessment. All other reports were "non-cases". Association between reactions and drugs was calculated using the reporting odds ratio (ROR) with 95% confidence intervals (CIs). A p value < 0.05 was considered significant.

RESULTS

The analysis was carried out on 1798 reports, of which 867 concerned DTCRs (cases) and 931 concerned non-cases. The calculated risk estimates were significant for cefotaxime (ROR 2.1; 95% CI 1.5 to 3), pristinamycin (ROR 4; 95% CI 2 to 7.9), sulfamethoxazole (ROR 4.4; 95% CI 1.6 to 11.7), oxacillin (ROR 2.2; 95% CI 1.2 to 3.8), doxycycline (ROR 10.8; 95% CI 1.4 to 84.9), carbamazepine (ROR 3.3; 95% CI 1.7 to 6.2), phenobarbital (ROR 2.3; 95% CI 1.03 to 5.1), allopurinol (ROR 3.6; 95% CI 1.8 to 7.2), furosemide (ROR 2.4; 95% CI 1.3 to 6.3), hydrochlorothiazide(ROR 2.9; 95% CI 1.3 to 6.3) and candesartan (ROR 4.7; 95% CI 1.3 to 16.6).

CONCLUSION

Our findings corroborate risks for a number of drugs, such as antibacterials, antiepileptics and allopurinol in inducing DTCRs. Given the widespread use of these drug classes, awareness should be raised among patients and prescribers about these risks.

摘要

目的

采用病例对照方法评估与药物相关的迟发型皮肤反应(DTCR),以确定药物风险。

方法

本研究使用了突尼斯莫纳斯提尔的药物警戒数据库。使用病例/非病例方法评估药物与 DTCR 之间的关联。根据 ATC 分类系统对药物进行分组。无论因果关系评估如何,只要患者出现 DTCR,就将其定义为“病例”。所有其他报告均为“非病例”。使用报告比值比(ROR)及其 95%置信区间(CI)计算反应与药物之间的关联。p 值<0.05 被认为具有统计学意义。

结果

共分析了 1798 份报告,其中 867 份报告与 DTCR(病例)有关,931 份报告与非病例有关。头孢噻肟(ROR 2.1;95%CI 1.5 至 3)、普林霉素(ROR 4;95%CI 2 至 7.9)、磺胺甲恶唑(ROR 4.4;95%CI 1.6 至 11.7)、苯唑西林(ROR 2.2;95%CI 1.2 至 3.8)、多西环素(ROR 10.8;95%CI 1.4 至 84.9)、卡马西平(ROR 3.3;95%CI 1.7 至 6.2)、苯巴比妥(ROR 2.3;95%CI 1.03 至 5.1)、别嘌呤醇(ROR 3.6;95%CI 1.8 至 7.2)、呋塞米(ROR 2.4;95%CI 1.3 至 6.3)、氢氯噻嗪(ROR 2.9;95%CI 1.3 至 6.3)和坎地沙坦(ROR 4.7;95%CI 1.3 至 16.6)的风险估计值具有统计学意义。

结论

我们的研究结果证实了一些药物(如抗菌药物、抗癫痫药和别嘌呤醇)诱发 DTCR 的风险。鉴于这些药物类别的广泛应用,应提高患者和处方者对这些风险的认识。

相似文献

1
Association of non-immediate drug hypersensitivity with drug exposure: A case control analysis of spontaneous reports from a Tunisian pharmacovigilance database.非即刻药物过敏反应与药物暴露的关联性:来自突尼斯药物警戒数据库自发报告的病例对照分析。
Eur J Intern Med. 2018 Jul;53:40-44. doi: 10.1016/j.ejim.2018.01.032. Epub 2018 Mar 2.
2
Allergic reactions to oral drugs: A case/non-case study from an Italian spontaneous reporting database (GIF).口服药物过敏反应:来自意大利自发报告数据库(GIF)的病例/非病例研究
Pharmacol Res. 2008 Sep-Oct;58(3-4):202-7. doi: 10.1016/j.phrs.2008.07.003. Epub 2008 Jul 23.
3
Safety profile of antiviral medications: a pharmacovigilance study using the Italian spontaneous-reporting database.抗病毒药物的安全性概况:使用意大利自发报告数据库的药物警戒研究。
Am J Health Syst Pharm. 2013 Jun 15;70(12):1039-46. doi: 10.2146/ajhp120665.
4
Surveillance of drugs that most frequently induce acute kidney injury: A pharmacovigilance approach.最常导致急性肾损伤的药物监测:一种药物警戒方法。
J Clin Pharm Ther. 2019 Feb;44(1):49-53. doi: 10.1111/jcpt.12748. Epub 2018 Jul 16.
5
Antipsychotic-Related DRESS Syndrome: Analysis of Individual Case Safety Reports of the WHO Pharmacovigilance Database.抗精神病药相关 DRESS 综合征:世界卫生组织药物警戒数据库个例安全报告分析。
Drug Saf. 2024 Aug;47(8):745-757. doi: 10.1007/s40264-024-01431-7. Epub 2024 May 9.
6
Adverse Cutaneous Drug Reactions Associated with Old- and New- Generation Antiepileptic Drugs Using the Japanese Pharmacovigilance Database.使用日本药物警戒数据库评估新旧代抗癫痫药物的不良皮肤药物反应。
Clin Drug Investig. 2019 Apr;39(4):363-368. doi: 10.1007/s40261-019-00754-z.
7
Drug-induced vitiligo: a case/non-case study in Vigibase , the WHO pharmacovigilance database.药物诱导性白癜风:一项病例/非病例研究在世界卫生组织药物警戒数据库 Vigibase 中。
Fundam Clin Pharmacol. 2020 Dec;34(6):736-742. doi: 10.1111/fcp.12558. Epub 2020 Apr 27.
8
More on the "Triple Whammy": antihypertensive drugs, non-steroidal anti-inflammatory agents and acute kidney injury - a case/non-case study in the French pharmacovigilance database.关于“三重打击”:抗高血压药物、非甾体抗炎药与急性肾损伤——法国药物警戒数据库中的病例/非病例研究
Ren Fail. 2014 Aug;36(7):1166-8. doi: 10.3109/0886022X.2014.917943. Epub 2014 May 15.
9
Influence of chemical structure on hypersensitivity reactions induced by antiepileptic drugs: the role of the aromatic ring.化学结构对抗癫痫药物诱发的超敏反应的影响:芳香环的作用。
Drug Saf. 2008;31(8):695-702. doi: 10.2165/00002018-200831080-00006.
10
Spontaneous reports of hypersensitivity adverse drug reactions in Portugal: a retrospective analysis.葡萄牙药物超敏不良反应的自发报告:一项回顾性分析。
Expert Opin Drug Saf. 2020 Jun;19(6):763-769. doi: 10.1080/14740338.2020.1743262. Epub 2020 Mar 25.

引用本文的文献

1
Adverse Skin Reactions with Antiepileptic Drugs Using Korea Adverse Event Reporting System Database, 2008-2017.2008-2017 年韩国不良事件报告系统数据库中抗癫痫药物的皮肤不良反应。
J Korean Med Sci. 2020 Feb 3;35(4):e17. doi: 10.3346/jkms.2020.35.e17.