Suppr超能文献

颅内压:非侵入性HeadSense监测仪与腰椎压力测量的比较

Intracranial Pressure: A Comparison of the Noninvasive HeadSense Monitor versus Lumbar Pressure Measurement.

作者信息

Hvedstrup Jeppe, Radojicic Aleksandra, Moudrous Walid, Herklots Martin Willy, Wert Anton, Holzgraefe Manfred, Obermann Mark, Schoonman Guus G, Jensen Rigmor Højland, Schytz Henrik Winther

机构信息

Headache Diagnostic Laboratory, Danish Headache Center and Department of Neurology, Rigshospitalet-Glostrup, Faculty of Health Sciences, University of Copenhagen, Glostrup, Denmark.

Danish Headache Center and Department of Neurology, Rigshospitalet-Glostrup, Faculty of Health Sciences, University of Copenhagen, Glostrup, Denmark; Neurology Clinic, Clinical Center of Serbia, Belgrade, Serbia.

出版信息

World Neurosurg. 2018 Apr;112:e576-e580. doi: 10.1016/j.wneu.2018.01.089. Epub 2018 Feb 2.

Abstract

OBJECTIVE

To compare a new method of noninvasive intracranial pressure (nICP) measurement with conventional lumbar puncture (LP) opening pressure.

METHODS

In a prospective multicenter study, patients undergoing LP for diagnostic purposes underwent intracranial pressure measurements with HeadSense, a noninvasive transcranial acoustic device, and indirectly with LP. Noninvasive measurements were conducted with the head in a 30° tilt and in supine position before and after LP. The primary endpoint was the correlation between nICP measurement in supine position before LP and the LP opening pressure.

RESULTS

There was no correlation between supine nICPs before LP and the LP opening pressures (r = -0.211, P = 0.358). The 30° head-tilt nICPs correlated with the supine nICPs before LP (r = 0.830, P < 0.01). There was no correlation between supine nICPs before and after LP (r = 0.056, P = 0.831) or between 30° head-tilt nICPs and LP opening pressures (r = -0.038, P = 0.861).

CONCLUSIONS

There was no correlation between nICPs and LP opening pressures. Further development is warranted before transcranial acoustic HeadSense can become a clinical tool for investigating patients with neurologic conditions.

摘要

目的

比较一种新的无创颅内压(nICP)测量方法与传统腰椎穿刺(LP)初压。

方法

在一项前瞻性多中心研究中,因诊断目的接受LP的患者使用无创经颅声学设备HeadSense进行颅内压测量,并间接通过LP测量。在LP前后,分别在头部呈30°倾斜位和仰卧位进行无创测量。主要终点是LP前仰卧位nICP测量值与LP初压之间的相关性。

结果

LP前仰卧位nICP与LP初压之间无相关性(r = -0.211,P = 0.358)。头部30°倾斜位nICP与LP前仰卧位nICP相关(r = 0.830,P < 0.01)。LP前后仰卧位nICP之间无相关性(r = 0.056,P = 0.831),头部30°倾斜位nICP与LP初压之间也无相关性(r = -0.038,P = 0.861)。

结论

nICP与LP初压之间无相关性。在经颅声学设备HeadSense成为用于调查神经系统疾病患者的临床工具之前,有必要进一步研发。

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验