Suppr超能文献

胺碘酮治疗难治性快速性心律失常时临床及亚临床毒性的高发生率。

High incidence of clinical and subclinical toxicity associated with amiodarone treatment of refractory tachyarrhythmias.

作者信息

Anastasiou-Nana M I, Anderson J L, Nanas J N, Lutz J R, Smith R A, Anderson K P, Crapo R O, Call N B

出版信息

Can J Cardiol. 1986 May-Jun;2(3):138-45.

PMID:2941121
Abstract

Amiodarone has been hailed as the most effective single antiarrhythmic drug for treatment of refractory supraventricular and ventricular arrhythmias. However, questions continue to arise about its long-term potential toxicity and true efficacy rates. We, therefore, reviewed our experience with 78 patients, mean age 59 +/- 14 years, with drug refractory tachyarrhythmias treated with amiodarone. Sixty-two patients were treated for recurrent ventricular tachycardia or ventricular fibrillation, 4 for complex ventricular ectopy and 12 for supraventricular tachyarrhythmias. Patients have been treated for a mean of 9.9 months (range, 1 day to 39.1 months); 34(55%) continued to be successfully treated for ventricular tachycardia/ventricular fibrillation, 2 (50%) for complex ventricular ectopy and 5 (42%) for supraventricular tachyarrhythmias. Amiodarone toxicity was frequent, occurring in 57/72 patients (79%) who were treated for more than one week. Adverse effects led to drug discontinuation in 15 (21%), 3 because of pulmonary toxicity (1 in combination with neuropathy and another with drug-induced hepatitis); 2 because of chemical hepatitis; 1, confusion; 6, neuropathy; 2, arrhythmia exacerbation; 2, symptomatic bradycardia; and 1 because of impotence. Of the 62 ventricular tachycardia/ventricular fibrillation patients who were treated with amiodarone, 8 (13%) expired: 4 died suddenly and 4 from documented ventricular tachycardia during treatment. In contrast, of 16 patients who had discontinued amiodarone because of initial adverse effects or drug failure and were treated with alternative antiarrhythmic medications, 5 (31%) died suddenly. In conclusion, amiodarone appears to be fairly effective in high risk patients with refractory cardiac tachyarrhythmias but results in a rather high incidence of adverse effects in long-term follow-up.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)

摘要

胺碘酮被誉为治疗难治性室上性和室性心律失常最有效的单一抗心律失常药物。然而,关于其长期潜在毒性和真实有效率的问题仍不断出现。因此,我们回顾了78例平均年龄为59±14岁、使用胺碘酮治疗药物难治性快速心律失常患者的经验。62例患者接受复发性室性心动过速或心室颤动治疗,4例接受复杂性室性早搏治疗,12例接受室上性快速心律失常治疗。患者接受治疗的平均时间为9.9个月(范围为1天至39.1个月);34例(55%)持续性室性心动过速/心室颤动患者治疗成功,2例(50%)复杂性室性早搏患者治疗成功,5例(42%)室上性快速心律失常患者治疗成功。胺碘酮毒性很常见,在接受治疗超过一周的72例患者中有57例(79%)出现。不良反应导致15例(21%)停药,3例因肺部毒性(1例合并神经病变,另1例合并药物性肝炎);2例因药物性肝炎;1例因意识模糊;6例因神经病变;2例因心律失常加重;2例因症状性心动过缓;1例因阳痿。在接受胺碘酮治疗的62例室性心动过速/心室颤动患者中,8例(13%)死亡:4例猝死,4例在治疗期间死于记录的室性心动过速。相比之下,16例因初始不良反应或药物治疗失败而停用胺碘酮并接受其他抗心律失常药物治疗的患者中,5例(31%)猝死。总之,胺碘酮对难治性心脏快速心律失常的高危患者似乎相当有效,但在长期随访中不良反应发生率较高。(摘要截短至250字)

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验