Suppr超能文献

经导管动脉化疗栓塞联合或不联合射频消融治疗巴塞罗那临床肝癌分期 B 期肝细胞癌的疗效比较。

Transcatheter Arterial Chemoembolization With or Without Radiofrequency Ablation: Outcomes in Patients With Barcelona Clinic Liver Cancer Stage B Hepatocellular Carcinoma.

机构信息

1 Department of Gastroenterology and Metabology, Ehime University Graduate School of Medicine, Shitsukawa 454, Toon, Ehime 791-0295, Japan.

2 Gastroenterology Center, Ehime Prefectural Central Hospital, Ehime, Japan.

出版信息

AJR Am J Roentgenol. 2018 Apr;210(4):891-898. doi: 10.2214/AJR.17.18177. Epub 2018 Feb 7.

Abstract

OBJECTIVE

The objective of our study was to clarify the indications for transcatheter arterial chemoembolization (TACE) of the hepatic artery combined with radiofrequency ablation (RFA), which we refer to as "TACE-RFA," for patients with hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) beyond the Milan criteria. This study assessed the prognoses of patients with intermediate-stage HCC, which we defined as Barcelona Clinic Liver Cancer (BCLC) stage B (hereafter referred to as BCLC-B), according to the BCLC-B substages through treatment in a multicenter study.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Two-hundred thirty patients with intermediate-stage HCC who were treated from January 2000 to December 2015 were enrolled. These patients were divided into four classes (B1-B4) according to the Bolondi classification. Between these substages, the prognosis of patients who underwent TACE-RFA was compared with that of patients who underwent TACE, the latter of which is the suggested standard therapy for patients with BCLC-B HCC.

RESULTS

TACE-RFA and hepatic resection survival curves were better than those of TACE (p < 0.001 for TACE-RFA vs TACE). In particular, for substages B1 and B2, the overall survival rates of patients who underwent TACE-RFA were significantly higher than those who underwent TACE (B1, p < 0.001 for TACE-RFA vs TACE; B2, p = 0.015 for TACE-RFA vs TACE).

CONCLUSION

The indications for TACE-RFA may be expanding to BCLC-B HCC. For patients with disease classified as substages B1 and B2, TACE-RFA may be a better treatment modality than TACE alone.

摘要

目的

本研究旨在明确经导管肝动脉化疗栓塞(TACE)联合射频消融(RFA)(我们称之为“TACE-RFA”)治疗米兰标准以外肝细胞癌(HCC)的适应证。本研究通过多中心研究评估了巴塞罗那临床肝癌(BCLC)分期 B(以下简称 BCLC-B)中期 HCC 患者的预后,根据 BCLC-B 亚期进行治疗。

材料与方法

2000 年 1 月至 2015 年 12 月期间,我们共纳入 230 例接受治疗的中期 HCC 患者。根据 Bolondi 分类,这些患者被分为 4 个亚组(B1-B4)。在这些亚组中,我们比较了接受 TACE-RFA 治疗和 TACE 治疗患者的预后,后者是 BCLC-B HCC 患者的标准治疗方法。

结果

TACE-RFA 和肝切除术的生存曲线优于 TACE(TACE-RFA 与 TACE 相比,p < 0.001)。特别是在 B1 和 B2 亚组中,接受 TACE-RFA 治疗的患者的总生存率明显高于接受 TACE 治疗的患者(B1,TACE-RFA 与 TACE 相比,p < 0.001;B2,TACE-RFA 与 TACE 相比,p = 0.015)。

结论

TACE-RFA 的适应证可能正在扩大到 BCLC-B HCC。对于疾病分类为 B1 和 B2 亚组的患者,TACE-RFA 可能是比单独 TACE 更好的治疗方法。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验