Department of Oncology, University of Turin, Italy; Division of Medical Oncology-1, Candiolo Cancer Institute - FPO, IRCCS, Candiolo, Italy.
Division of Investigative Clinical Oncology, Candiolo Cancer Institute - FPO, IRCCS, Candiolo, Italy.
Breast. 2018 Apr;38:160-164. doi: 10.1016/j.breast.2018.01.006. Epub 2018 Feb 3.
Patients with metastatic breast cancer (MBC) can derive clinical benefit from several subsequent lines of chemotherapy. However, in heavily pre-treated patients, agents with clinical activity, a favourable side effects profile and a convenient administration modality are preferred.
We retrospectively analyzed 110 patients with previously treated MBC, who received oral etoposide at the dose of 50 mg/day for 20 days in 28 days cycles, between 2003 and 2017. Because this was not a prospectively planned study, to describe the clinical performance of oral etoposide we adopted the approach suggested by Dzimitrowicz and colleagues (J Clin Oncol. 2016; 34:3511-17); Tumour Response (TR) was defined as the proportion of physician-reported clinical or imaging response; Prolonged Duration on Therapy (PDT) as the proportion of non-progressing patients whose treatment lasted more than 6 months. Furthermore, we evaluated median duration on therapy (TD) and median Overall Survival (OS) by the Kaplan Meier method.
The median number of previous chemotherapy lines was 5 (range 2-8). TR, PDT, median TD and median OS were 6.4%, 18.2% 4 (range 3.5-4.5) and 10.6 (range 8.4-12.8) months respectively. Interestingly, etoposide activity was unrelated to the number of previous lines and type of metastatic involvement. Oral etoposide was well tolerated with only two patients discontinuing therapy due to toxicity.
In this large, single Institution, real practice analysis oral etoposide is a valuable and safe option for pre-treated metastatic breast cancer patients and might be considered in patients failing other approaches, but still suitable for chemotherapy.
转移性乳腺癌(MBC)患者可从几线后续化疗中获益。然而,在治疗负荷较大的患者中,更倾向于选择具有临床活性、良好的副作用特征和方便给药方式的药物。
我们回顾性分析了 2003 年至 2017 年间 110 例接受 50mg/天,28 天为一周期,共 20 天的口服依托泊苷治疗的既往治疗过的 MBC 患者。由于这不是一项前瞻性计划的研究,为了描述口服依托泊苷的临床疗效,我们采用了 Dzimitrowicz 等人提出的方法(J Clin Oncol. 2016; 34:3511-17);肿瘤缓解(TR)定义为报告的临床或影像学缓解的医生比例;延长治疗持续时间(PDT)定义为治疗持续时间超过 6 个月且无进展的患者比例。此外,我们通过 Kaplan-Meier 法评估了中位治疗持续时间(TD)和中位总生存期(OS)。
患者先前接受化疗的中位数为 5 线(范围 2-8)。TR、PDT、中位 TD 和中位 OS 分别为 6.4%、18.2%、4 个月(范围 3.5-4.5)和 10.6 个月(范围 8.4-12.8)。有趣的是,依托泊苷的疗效与之前的化疗线数和转移受累类型无关。口服依托泊苷耐受性良好,仅有 2 例患者因毒性而停止治疗。
在这项大型的、单机构的真实实践分析中,口服依托泊苷是一种有价值且安全的选择,适用于治疗过的转移性乳腺癌患者,可考虑用于其他治疗方法失败但仍适合化疗的患者。