Department of Microbiology, Faculty of Medicine, Kuwait University, Kuwait, Kuwait.
Al-Rashed Allergy Center, Ministry of Health, Kuwait, Kuwait.
Med Princ Pract. 2018;27(3):260-266. doi: 10.1159/000487482. Epub 2018 Feb 7.
To evaluate the long-term efficacy and safety of omalizumab in asthma in a real-life setting.
This 4-year observational study included 65 patients treated with omalizumab during clinic visits; treatment response was rated as excellent, good, and partial based on a modified physician's Global Evaluation of Treatment Effectiveness (mGETE) scale of emergency room visits (ERV), hospitalization, use of oral corticosteroids, inhaled corticosteroid (ICS)/long-acting β-agonist (LABA) dose, and short-acting β-agonist rescue. The following tests were done: forced expiratory volume in 1 s (FEV1) and the asthma control test (ACT). Measurements were performed 1 month before therapy and at 16 weeks, 1 year, and 4 years of treatment. Statistical analyses were done using the Wilcoxon signed-rank test, Spearman rank correlation, and McNemar χ2 test.
The dropout rate was 15 (18.5%): 8 nonresponders (10.0%); 2 patients died (2.5%), and 5 were lost to follow-up (6.25%). Treatment response was excellent in 35 (53.8%); good in 23 (35.4%), and partial in 7 patients (10.8%). The number of excellent responders increased from 35 (53.8%) at 16 weeks to 48 (73.8%) at the 4-year follow-up. The number of patients who did not require ERV improved from 0 to 59 (90.8%), and the lowest rate of hospitalization was 1 in year 4 (p < 0.001); patients who did not require courses of oral corticosteroids improved from 0 to 54 (83%). ICS/LABA dose significantly reduced from 65 (100%) to 25 (38.5%) after 4 years of treatment (p < 0.001); ACT scores significantly increased from 15 ± 3 at baseline to 23 ± 3 (p < 0.001) and FEV1 level from 55.6 ± 10.6 to 76.63 ± 10.34 at year 4.
In this study, omalizumab therapy resulted in better asthma control, and was effective and well tolerated as an add-on therapy for patients with moderate-to-severe asthma.
在真实环境中评估奥马珠单抗治疗哮喘的长期疗效和安全性。
这是一项为期 4 年的观察性研究,纳入了 65 名在就诊期间接受奥马珠单抗治疗的患者;根据改良医师整体治疗效果评估量表(mGETE)评估急诊就诊(ERV)、住院、口服皮质类固醇、吸入皮质类固醇(ICS)/长效β激动剂(LABA)剂量和短效β激动剂缓解剂的治疗反应,将治疗反应评为优秀、良好和部分。进行以下测试:用力呼气量 1 秒(FEV1)和哮喘控制测试(ACT)。治疗前 1 个月和治疗 16 周、1 年和 4 年后进行测量。使用 Wilcoxon 符号秩检验、Spearman 秩相关和 McNemar χ2检验进行统计分析。
失访率为 15 例(18.5%):8 例无应答者(10.0%);2 例患者死亡(2.5%),5 例失访(6.25%)。治疗反应优秀者 35 例(53.8%),良好者 23 例(35.4%),部分反应者 7 例(10.8%)。16 周时,优秀反应者的数量从 35 例(53.8%)增加到 4 年随访时的 48 例(73.8%)。不需要 ERV 的患者数量从 0 例增加到 59 例(90.8%),住院率最低的是第 4 年的 1 例(p<0.001);不需要口服皮质类固醇治疗的患者从 0 例增加到 54 例(83%)。ICS/LABA 剂量从治疗 4 年后的 65 例(100%)降至 25 例(38.5%)(p<0.001);ACT 评分从基线时的 15±3 增加到第 4 年的 23±3(p<0.001),FEV1 水平从 55.6±10.6 增加到 76.63±10.34。
在这项研究中,奥马珠单抗治疗可改善哮喘控制,作为中重度哮喘患者的附加治疗,有效且耐受良好。