• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

QMAC-dRAST 对血培养分离的葡萄球菌和肠球菌的性能评估:与 VITEK-2 系统比较性能的研究。

Performance evaluation of the QMAC-dRAST for staphylococci and enterococci isolated from blood culture: a comparative study of performance with the VITEK-2 system.

机构信息

Department of Laboratory Medicine and Genetics, Samsung Medical Center, Sungkyunkwan University School of Medicine, Seoul, South Korea.

出版信息

J Antimicrob Chemother. 2018 May 1;73(5):1267-1271. doi: 10.1093/jac/dky015.

DOI:10.1093/jac/dky015
PMID:29415214
Abstract

OBJECTIVES

To evaluate the performance of a rapid antimicrobial susceptibility testing (AST) platform based on microfluidic chip technology, the QMAC-dRAST, which enables AST from colony isolates or positive blood culture broth (PBCB), and to compare the performance of the QMAC-dRAST for staphylococci and enterococci with that of the VITEK-2 system based on reference broth microdilution (BMD).

METHODS

A total of 110 staphylococcal and enterococcal isolates from blood cultures were included. AST was performed directly using the QMAC-dRAST with PBCB. Thereafter, colony isolates derived from subculture of PBCB were used for the QMAC-dRAST, the VITEK-2 system and BMD.

RESULTS

The overall agreement between the QMAC-dRAST with PBCB and BMD was 91.5%. There were 1.2% very major errors (VMEs), 4.3% major errors (MEs) and 5.4% minor errors (mEs). The QMAC-dRAST with colony isolates yielded 94.6% agreement and error rates of 1.0% VMEs, 1.8% MEs and 4.0% mEs. The VITEK-2 system showed 96.2% agreement and error rates of 2.3% VMEs, 0.5% MEs and 2.6% mEs. The incubation time in the QMAC-dRAST was significantly shorter than in the VITEK-2 system (median of 6 versus 10 h; P < 0.0001).

CONCLUSIONS

The QMAC-dRAST system provided rapid results and represents an alternative to conventional AST methods. The QMAC-dRAST with colony isolates produced more reliable results for staphylococci and enterococci than the QMAC-dRAST with PBCB. The QMAC-dRAST system also performed comparably to BMD and the VITEK-2 system.

摘要

目的

评估一种基于微流控芯片技术的快速抗菌药敏测试(AST)平台 QMAC-dRAST 的性能,该平台可从菌落分离物或阳性血培养肉汤(PBCB)中进行 AST,并比较 QMAC-dRAST 对葡萄球菌和肠球菌的性能与基于参考肉汤微量稀释(BMD)的 VITEK-2 系统的性能。

方法

共纳入 110 株来自血培养的葡萄球菌和肠球菌分离株。使用 QMAC-dRAST 直接对 PBCB 进行 AST。此后,使用 QMAC-dRAST、VITEK-2 系统和 BMD 对 PBCB 衍生的菌落分离物进行 AST。

结果

QMAC-dRAST 与 PBCB 和 BMD 的总体一致性为 91.5%。有 1.2%的非常大误差(VME)、4.3%的主要误差(ME)和 5.4%的次要误差(mE)。QMAC-dRAST 与菌落分离物的一致性为 94.6%,VME、ME 和 mE 的错误率分别为 1.0%、1.8%和 4.0%。VITEK-2 系统显示 96.2%的一致性,VME、ME 和 mE 的错误率分别为 2.3%、0.5%和 2.6%。QMAC-dRAST 的孵育时间明显短于 VITEK-2 系统(中位数分别为 6 小时和 10 小时;P<0.0001)。

结论

QMAC-dRAST 系统提供了快速的结果,是常规 AST 方法的一种替代方法。QMAC-dRAST 与菌落分离物对葡萄球菌和肠球菌产生的结果比 QMAC-dRAST 与 PBCB 更可靠。QMAC-dRAST 系统的性能也与 BMD 和 VITEK-2 系统相当。

相似文献

1
Performance evaluation of the QMAC-dRAST for staphylococci and enterococci isolated from blood culture: a comparative study of performance with the VITEK-2 system.QMAC-dRAST 对血培养分离的葡萄球菌和肠球菌的性能评估:与 VITEK-2 系统比较性能的研究。
J Antimicrob Chemother. 2018 May 1;73(5):1267-1271. doi: 10.1093/jac/dky015.
2
Evaluation of the QMAC-dRAST System Version 2.5 for Rapid Antimicrobial Susceptibility Testing of Gram-Negative Bacteria From Positive Blood Culture Broth and Subcultured Colony Isolates.评价 QMAC-dRAST 系统版本 2.5 对阳性血培养肉汤和分离培养菌落的革兰氏阴性菌进行快速抗菌药物敏感性测试的效果。
J Clin Lab Anal. 2024 May;38(9):e25043. doi: 10.1002/jcla.25043. Epub 2024 May 28.
3
QMAC-dRAST for the direct testing of antibiotic susceptibility for Enterobacterales in positive blood-culture broth: a comparison of the performances with the MicroScan system and direct disc diffusion testing methods.QMAC-dRAST 用于直接检测阳性血培养肉汤中的肠杆菌科的抗生素敏感性:与 MicroScan 系统和直接药敏纸片扩散法比较性能。
J Antimicrob Chemother. 2023 Mar 2;78(3):684-691. doi: 10.1093/jac/dkac441.
4
Assessment of version 2.5 of QMAC-dRAST for rapid antimicrobial susceptibility testing with reduced sample-to-answer turnaround time and an integrated expert system.评估 QMAC-dRAST 版本 2.5 用于快速抗菌药物敏感性测试,具有缩短样本至结果的周转时间和集成的专家系统。
Infect Dis Now. 2021 Aug;51(5):470-476. doi: 10.1016/j.idnow.2020.10.005. Epub 2020 Dec 30.
5
Comparative evaluation of the QMAC-dRAST V2.0 system for rapid antibiotic susceptibility testing of Gram-negative blood culture isolates.QMAC-dRAST V2.0 系统用于革兰氏阴性血培养分离物快速抗生素药敏试验的比较评估。
J Microbiol Methods. 2020 May;172:105902. doi: 10.1016/j.mimet.2020.105902. Epub 2020 Mar 20.
6
Performance Evaluation of the Quantamatrix QMAC-dRAST System for Rapid Antibiotic Susceptibility Testing Directly from Blood Cultures.直接从血培养物进行快速抗生素敏感性测试的Quantamatrix QMAC-dRAST系统的性能评估
Microorganisms. 2022 Jun 14;10(6):1212. doi: 10.3390/microorganisms10061212.
7
Performance of Vitek 2 for antimicrobial susceptibility testing of Staphylococcus spp. and Enterococcus spp.Vitek 2 用于检测金黄色葡萄球菌和肠球菌属的抗菌药物敏感性试验的性能。
J Clin Microbiol. 2014 Feb;52(2):392-7. doi: 10.1128/JCM.02432-13. Epub 2013 Nov 13.
8
Direct, rapid antimicrobial susceptibility test from positive blood cultures based on microscopic imaging analysis.基于显微镜成像分析的阳性血培养物直接快速抗菌药物敏感性检测。
Sci Rep. 2017 Apr 25;7(1):1148. doi: 10.1038/s41598-017-01278-2.
9
Prospective evaluation of a rapid antimicrobial susceptibility test (QMAC-dRAST) for selecting optimal targeted antibiotics in positive blood culture.前瞻性评估快速抗菌药敏试验(QMAC-dRAST)在阳性血培养中选择最佳靶向抗生素的效果。
J Antimicrob Chemother. 2019 Aug 1;74(8):2255-2260. doi: 10.1093/jac/dkz168.
10
Antimicrobial susceptibility testing of pathogens isolated from blood culture: a performance comparison of Accelerate Pheno™ and VITEK® 2 systems with the broth microdilution method.血培养分离病原体的药敏试验:Accelerate Pheno™ 与 VITEK® 2 系统与肉汤微量稀释法的性能比较。
J Antimicrob Chemother. 2019 Jan 1;74(Suppl 1):i24-i31. doi: 10.1093/jac/dky532.

引用本文的文献

1
Comparative Assessment of Rapid Identification and Antimicrobial Susceptibility Testing Methods for Bloodstream Infections in a Non-24/7 Clinical Microbiology Laboratory.非全天候临床微生物实验室中血流感染快速鉴定及药敏试验方法的比较评估
Microorganisms. 2025 Apr 30;13(5):1041. doi: 10.3390/microorganisms13051041.
2
New Option for Antibiotic Susceptibility Testing in Clinical Practice: Performance Evaluation of AutoMic-i600 Automatic System Based on Broth Microdilution Method.临床实践中抗生素敏感性检测的新选择:基于肉汤微量稀释法的AutoMic-i600自动系统性能评估
Infect Drug Resist. 2025 Jan 28;18:543-556. doi: 10.2147/IDR.S499486. eCollection 2025.
3
Getting Up to Speed: Rapid Pathogen and Antimicrobial Resistance Diagnostics in Sepsis.
紧跟前沿:脓毒症中快速病原体及抗菌药物耐药性诊断
Microorganisms. 2024 Sep 3;12(9):1824. doi: 10.3390/microorganisms12091824.
4
Evaluating the impact of rapid antimicrobial susceptibility testing for bloodstream infections: a review of actionability, antibiotic use and patient outcome metrics.评估血流感染快速抗菌药物敏感性检测的影响:对可操作性、抗生素使用和患者转归指标的综述。
J Antimicrob Chemother. 2024 Sep 19;79(Supplement_1):i13-i25. doi: 10.1093/jac/dkae282.
5
Evaluation of the QMAC-dRAST System Version 2.5 for Rapid Antimicrobial Susceptibility Testing of Gram-Negative Bacteria From Positive Blood Culture Broth and Subcultured Colony Isolates.评价 QMAC-dRAST 系统版本 2.5 对阳性血培养肉汤和分离培养菌落的革兰氏阴性菌进行快速抗菌药物敏感性测试的效果。
J Clin Lab Anal. 2024 May;38(9):e25043. doi: 10.1002/jcla.25043. Epub 2024 May 28.
6
Antimicrobial Multidrug Resistance: Clinical Implications for Infection Management in Critically Ill Patients.抗菌多药耐药性:对重症患者感染管理的临床意义
Microorganisms. 2023 Oct 16;11(10):2575. doi: 10.3390/microorganisms11102575.
7
Performance Evaluation of the Quantamatrix QMAC-dRAST System for Rapid Antibiotic Susceptibility Testing Directly from Blood Cultures.直接从血培养物进行快速抗生素敏感性测试的Quantamatrix QMAC-dRAST系统的性能评估
Microorganisms. 2022 Jun 14;10(6):1212. doi: 10.3390/microorganisms10061212.
8
Performance of dRAST on Prospective Clinical Blood Culture Samples in a Simulated Clinical Setting and on Multidrug-Resistant Bacteria.dRAST 在模拟临床环境中的前瞻性临床血培养样本和多药耐药菌中的性能。
Microbiol Spectr. 2022 Apr 27;10(2):e0210721. doi: 10.1128/spectrum.02107-21. Epub 2022 Mar 2.
9
Assessment of rapid direct E-test on positive blood culture for same-day antimicrobial susceptibility.快速直接 E 试验对阳性血培养物进行即时抗菌药敏评估。
Braz J Microbiol. 2019 Oct;50(4):953-959. doi: 10.1007/s42770-019-00139-6. Epub 2019 Aug 20.
10
Antimicrobial susceptibility testing of pathogens isolated from blood culture: a performance comparison of Accelerate Pheno™ and VITEK® 2 systems with the broth microdilution method.血培养分离病原体的药敏试验:Accelerate Pheno™ 与 VITEK® 2 系统与肉汤微量稀释法的性能比较。
J Antimicrob Chemother. 2019 Jan 1;74(Suppl 1):i24-i31. doi: 10.1093/jac/dky532.