Suppr超能文献

颈部前路入路:麻醉医师和外科医师的一项调查

Front of neck access: A survey among anesthetists and surgeons.

作者信息

Mendonca Cyprian, Ahmad Imran, Sajayan Achuthapillai, Shanmugam Rathinavel, Sharma Manu, Tosh Will, Pallister Emily, Kimani Peter K

机构信息

Department of Anaesthesia, University Hospitals Coventry & Warwickshire NHS Trust, Coventry, UK.

Department of Anaesthesia, Guy's and St Thomas' Hospital, London, UK.

出版信息

J Anaesthesiol Clin Pharmacol. 2017 Oct-Dec;33(4):462-466. doi: 10.4103/joacp.JOACP_109_17.

Abstract

BACKGROUND AND AIMS

Emergency front of neck access (FONA) is the final step in a Can't Intubate-Can't Oxygenate (CICO) scenario. In view of maintaining simplicity and promoting standardized training, the 2015 Difficult Airway Society guidelines recommend surgical cricothyroidotomy using scalpel, bougie, and tube (SBT) as the preferred technique.

MATERIAL AND METHODS

We undertook a survey over a 2-week period to evaluate the knowledge and training, preferred rescue technique, and confidence in performing the SBT technique. Data were collected from both anesthetists and surgeons.

RESULTS

One hundred and eighty-nine responses were collected across four hospitals in the United Kingdom. The majority of participants were anesthetists (55%). One hundred and eleven (59%) respondents were aware of the national guidelines (96.2% among anesthetists and 12.9% among surgeons). Only 71 (37.6%) respondents indicated that they had formal FONA training within the last one year. Seventy-five anesthetists (72.8%) knew that SBT equipment was readily available in their department, while most surgeons (81.2%) did not know what equipment available. One hundred and five (55.5%) respondents were confident in performing surgical cricothyroidotomy in a situation where the membrane was palpable and only in 33 (17.5%) where the cricothyroid membrane was not palpable.

CONCLUSION

This survey has demonstrated that despite evidence of good training for anesthetists in FONA, there are still shortfalls in the training and knowledge of our surgical colleagues. In an emergency, surgeons may be required to assist or secure an airway in a CICO situation. Regular multidisciplinary training of all clinicians working with anesthetized patients should be encouraged and supported.

摘要

背景与目的

紧急颈部前方入路(FONA)是“无法插管-无法给氧”(CICO)情况下的最后一步。鉴于保持操作简便并促进标准化培训,2015年困难气道协会指南推荐使用手术刀、探条和气管导管的外科环甲膜切开术(SBT)作为首选技术。

材料与方法

我们在两周内进行了一项调查,以评估对SBT技术的知识掌握情况、培训情况、首选的挽救技术以及操作信心。数据收集自麻醉医生和外科医生。

结果

在英国的四家医院共收集到189份回复。大多数参与者是麻醉医生(55%)。111名(59%)受访者知晓国家指南(麻醉医生中为96.2%,外科医生中为12.9%)。只有71名(37.6%)受访者表示他们在过去一年中接受过正式的FONA培训。75名麻醉医生(72.8%)知道其所在科室备有SBT设备,而大多数外科医生(81.2%)不知道有哪些可用设备。105名(55.5%)受访者有信心在能摸到环甲膜的情况下进行外科环甲膜切开术,而只有33名(17.5%)受访者在摸不到环甲膜时也有信心。

结论

这项调查表明,尽管有证据显示麻醉医生在FONA方面接受了良好培训,但我们外科同行的培训和知识仍存在不足。在紧急情况下,可能需要外科医生在CICO情况下协助建立或确保气道安全。应鼓励并支持对所有参与麻醉患者治疗的临床医生进行定期的多学科培训。

相似文献

1
Front of neck access: A survey among anesthetists and surgeons.颈部前路入路:麻醉医师和外科医师的一项调查
J Anaesthesiol Clin Pharmacol. 2017 Oct-Dec;33(4):462-466. doi: 10.4103/joacp.JOACP_109_17.

本文引用的文献

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验