Suppr超能文献

心理治疗暴食症后有多少个体达到症状缓解?一项荟萃分析综述。

How many individuals achieve symptom abstinence following psychological treatments for bulimia nervosa? A meta-analytic review.

机构信息

School of Psychology, Deakin University, 221 Burwood Highway, Burwood, Victoria 3125, Australia.

School of Psychology, Flinders University, GPO Box 2100, Adelaide, South Australia, 5001, Australia.

出版信息

Int J Eat Disord. 2018 Apr;51(4):287-294. doi: 10.1002/eat.22838. Epub 2018 Feb 8.

Abstract

OBJECTIVES

It is unclear how many patients with bulimia nervosa (BN) completely abstain from the core behavioral symptoms after receiving psychological treatment. The present meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials (RCTs) aimed to (a) estimate the prevalence of patients who abstain from binge eating and/or purging following all psychological treatments for BN, and (b) test whether these abstinence estimates are moderated by the type of treatment modality delivered, the definition of abstinence applied, and trial quality.

METHOD

Forty-five RCTs were included, with 78 psychotherapy conditions. Pooled event rates were calculated using random effects models.

RESULTS

At post-treatment, the total weighted percentage of treatment-completers who achieved abstinence was 35.4% (95% CI = 29.6, 41.7), while the total weighted percentage of abstinence for all randomized patients (intention-to-treat) was 29.9% (95% CI = 25.7, 33.2). Abstinence estimates were highest in trials that used behavioral-based treatments (e.g., cognitive-behavioral therapy, behavior therapy). There was also evidence that guided self-help interventions produced the lowest post-treatment abstinence rates, but with no difference at follow-up from clinician-led treatments, and studies that used a shorter timeframe for defining abstinence (i.e., 14 days symptom-free compared to 28-days symptom-free) produced the highest abstinence rates. Abstinence estimates at follow-up for both the completer (34.6%; 95% CI = 29.3, 40.2) and intention-to-treat (28.6%; 95% CI = 25.1, 32.3) analyses were essentially the same as the post-treatment estimates.

DISCUSSION

Over 60% of patients fail to fully abstain from core BN symptoms even after receiving our most empirically-supported treatments. The present findings highlight the urgency toward improving the effectiveness of psychological treatments for BN.

摘要

目的

目前尚不清楚有多少神经性贪食症(BN)患者在接受心理治疗后完全戒除核心行为症状。本项针对随机对照试验(RCT)的荟萃分析旨在:(a)估计所有 BN 心理治疗后完全戒除暴食和/或催吐行为的患者比例;(b)检验这些戒除率是否受到治疗方式类型、应用的戒除定义和试验质量的影响。

方法

纳入 45 项 RCT,共 78 种心理治疗方法。采用随机效应模型计算汇总事件率。

结果

治疗结束时,完成治疗的患者中,完全戒除的加权百分比为 35.4%(95%可信区间=29.6%,41.7%),而所有随机患者(意向治疗)的完全戒除率为 29.9%(95%可信区间=25.7%,33.2%)。采用基于行为的治疗方法(如认知行为疗法、行为疗法)的试验中,戒除率最高。有证据表明,接受指导的自助干预产生的治疗后戒除率最低,但与临床医生主导的治疗在随访时无差异,且将定义为无症状的时间窗缩短(即,14 天无症状与 28 天无症状相比)会产生更高的戒除率。完成治疗者(34.6%;95%可信区间=29.3%,40.2%)和意向治疗者(28.6%;95%可信区间=25.1%,32.3%)的随访时的戒除率与治疗结束时基本相同。

讨论

即使接受了我们最具循证支持的治疗,仍有超过 60%的患者无法完全戒除 BN 的核心症状。本研究结果强调了迫切需要提高 BN 心理治疗的有效性。

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验