Suppr超能文献

颅内高压与脑自动调节:一项系统评价与荟萃分析

Intracranial Hypertension and Cerebral Autoregulation: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.

作者信息

de-Lima-Oliveira Marcelo, Salinet Angela S M, Nogueira Ricardo C, de Azevedo Daniel S, Paiva Wellingson S, Teixeira Manoel J, Bor-Seng-Shu Edson

机构信息

Division of Neurosurgery, Hospital das Clinicas da Faculdade de Medicina da Universidade de Sao Paulo, Sao Paulo, Brazil.

Division of Neurosurgery, Hospital das Clinicas da Faculdade de Medicina da Universidade de Sao Paulo, Sao Paulo, Brazil.

出版信息

World Neurosurg. 2018 May;113:110-124. doi: 10.1016/j.wneu.2018.01.194. Epub 2018 Feb 6.

Abstract

OBJECTIVE

To present a systematic review and meta-analysis to establish the relation between cerebral autoregulation (CA) and intracranial hypertension.

METHODS

An electronic search using the term "Cerebral autoregulation and intracranial hypertension" was designed to identify studies that analyzed cerebral blood flow autoregulation in patients undergoing intracranial pressure (ICP) monitoring. The data were used in meta-analyses and sensitivity analyses.

RESULTS

A static CA technique was applied in 10 studies (26.3%), a dynamic technique was applied in 25 studies (65.8%), and both techniques were used in 3 studies (7.9%). Static CA studies using the cerebral blood flow technique revealed impaired CA in patients with an ICP ≥20 (standardized mean difference [SMD] 5.44%, 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.25-10.65, P = 0.04); static CA studies with transcranial Doppler revealed a tendency toward impaired CA in patients with ICP ≥20 (SMD -7.83%, 95% CI -17.52 to 1.85, P = 0.11). Moving correlation studies reported impaired CA in patients with ICP ≥20 (SMD 0.06, 95% CI 0.07-0.14, P < 0.00001). A comparison of CA values and mean ICP revealed a correlation between greater ICP and impaired CA (SMD 5.47, 95% CI 1.39-10.1, P = 0.01). Patients with ICP ≥20 had an elevated risk of impaired CA (OR 2.27, 95% CI 1.20-4.31, P = 0.01).

CONCLUSIONS

A clear tendency toward CA impairment was observed in patients with increased ICP.

摘要

目的

进行一项系统评价和荟萃分析,以确定脑自动调节(CA)与颅内高压之间的关系。

方法

设计一项使用“脑自动调节与颅内高压”这一术语的电子检索,以识别分析接受颅内压(ICP)监测患者脑血流自动调节的研究。数据用于荟萃分析和敏感性分析。

结果

10项研究(26.3%)应用了静态CA技术,25项研究(65.8%)应用了动态技术,3项研究(7.9%)同时使用了这两种技术。使用脑血流技术的静态CA研究显示,ICP≥20的患者CA受损(标准化均值差[SMD]5.44%,95%置信区间[CI]0.25 - 10.65,P = 0.04);经颅多普勒的静态CA研究显示,ICP≥20的患者有CA受损的趋势(SMD -7.83%,95% CI -17.52至1.85,P = 0.11)。移动相关性研究报告ICP≥20的患者CA受损(SMD 0.06,95% CI 0.07 - 0.14,P < 0.00001)。CA值与平均ICP的比较显示,较高的ICP与CA受损之间存在相关性(SMD 5.47,95% CI 1.39 - 10.1,P = 0.01)。ICP≥20的患者CA受损风险升高(OR 2.27,95% CI

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验