Meira Carolina, Joerger Fabiola B, Kutter Annette P N, Waldmann Andreas, Ringer Simone K, Böehm Stephan H, Iff Samuel, Mosing Martina
Vetsuisse Faculty, University of Zurich, Zurich, Switzerland.
Vetsuisse Faculty, University of Zurich, Zurich, Switzerland.
Vet Anaesth Analg. 2018 Mar;45(2):145-157. doi: 10.1016/j.vaa.2017.11.001. Epub 2017 Dec 5.
To compare the efficacy of three continuous positive airway pressure (CPAP) interfaces in dogs on gas exchange, lung volumes, amount of leak during CPAP and rebreathing in case of equipment failure or disconnection.
Randomized, prospective, crossover, experimental trial.
Ten purpose-bred Beagle dogs.
Dogs were in dorsal recumbency during medetomidine-propofol constant rate infusions, breathing room air. Three interfaces were tested in each dog in a consecutive random order: custom-made mask (M), conical face mask (FM) and helmet (H). End-expiratory lung impedance (EELI) measured by electrical impedance tomography was assessed with no interface (baseline), with the interface only (No-CPAP for 3 minutes) and at 15 minutes of 7 cmHO CPAP (CPAP-delivery). PaO was assessed at No-CPAP and CPAP-delivery, partial pressure of inspired carbon dioxide (PICO; rebreathing assessment) at No-CPAP and the interface leak (ΔP) at CPAP-delivery. Mixed-effects linear regression models were used for statistical analysis (p<0.05).
During CPAP-delivery, all interfaces increased EELI by 7% (p<0.001). Higher ΔP was observed with M and H (9 cmHO) in comparison with FM (1 cmHO) (p<0.001). At No-CPAP, less rebreathing occurred with M (0.5 kPa, 4 mmHg) than with FM (1.8 kPa, 14 mmHg) and with H (1.4 kPa, 11 mmHg), but also lower PaO was measured with M (9.3 kPa, 70 mmHg) than with H (11.9 kPa, 90 mmHg) and FM (10.8 kPa, 81 mmHg).
All three interfaces can be used to provide adequate CPAP in dogs. The leak during CPAP-delivery and the risk of rebreathing and hypoxaemia, when CPAP is not maintained, can be significant. Therefore, animals should always be supervised during administration of CPAP with any of the three interfaces. The performance of the custom-made M was not superior to the other interfaces.
比较三种持续气道正压通气(CPAP)接口对犬气体交换、肺容量、CPAP期间漏气量以及设备故障或断开连接时重复呼吸情况的影响。
随机、前瞻性、交叉、实验性试验。
十只专门培育的比格犬。
在美托咪定-丙泊酚持续输注期间,犬呈仰卧位,呼吸室内空气。对每只犬按连续随机顺序测试三种接口:定制面罩(M)、锥形面罩(FM)和头盔(H)。通过电阻抗断层扫描测量的呼气末肺阻抗(EELI)在无接口(基线)、仅使用接口(3分钟无CPAP)以及7 cmH₂O CPAP(CPAP输送)15分钟时进行评估。在无CPAP和CPAP输送时评估PaO₂,在无CPAP时评估吸入二氧化碳分压(PICO;重复呼吸评估),在CPAP输送时评估接口漏气(ΔP)。采用混合效应线性回归模型进行统计分析(p<0.05)。
在CPAP输送期间,所有接口均使EELI增加7%(p<0.001)。与FM(1 cmH₂O)相比,M和H的ΔP更高(9 cmH₂O)(p<0.001)。在无CPAP时,M(0.5 kPa,4 mmHg)的重复呼吸比FM(1.8 kPa,14 mmHg)和H(1.4 kPa,11 mmHg)少,但M测得的PaO₂(9.3 kPa,70 mmHg)也低于H(11.9 kPa,90 mmHg)和FM(10.8 kPa,81 mmHg)。
所有三种接口均可用于为犬提供足够的CPAP。CPAP输送期间的漏气以及CPAP未维持时重复呼吸和低氧血症的风险可能很大。因此,在使用这三种接口中的任何一种进行CPAP给药期间,动物都应始终受到监测。定制的M的性能并不优于其他接口。