• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

[采用改良Smith-Peterson入路和改良Hardinge入路治疗Pipkin I型和II型股骨头骨折——一项病例对照研究]

[Treatment of Pipkin type I and II femoral head fractures through modified Smith-Peterson approach and modified Hardinge approach-a case-control studies].

作者信息

Jiang Yu-Qing, Huang Jian, Guo Wei-Kang, Lai Bing, Wang Jun, Liang Chuan-Xing, Liu Song-Lang, Lin Wei-Ming

机构信息

Department of Joint Surgery, Meizhou Hospital Affiliated to Sun Yat-sen University, Meizhou 514031, Guangdong, China;

Department of Joint Surgery, Meizhou Hospital Affiliated to Sun Yat-sen University, Meizhou 514031, Guangdong, China.

出版信息

Zhongguo Gu Shang. 2017 Jul 25;30(7):616-621. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1003-0034.2017.07.007.

DOI:10.3969/j.issn.1003-0034.2017.07.007
PMID:29424150
Abstract

OBJECTIVE

To compare clinical results of treatment of Pipkin type I and II femoral head fractures through modified Smith-Peterson(S-P) approach and modified Hardinge approach.

METHODS

From July 2005 to July 2014, 42 patients with Pipkin type I and II femoral head fractures were treated with operation. A total of 23 patients in anterior group was treated with modified S-P approach including 17 males and 6 females with an average age of (29.3±9.4) years old, 5 cases of type I by excision of the fragement, 3 cases of type I and 15 cases of type II cases by fixation of the fragement. While a total of 19 patients in the lateral group was treated with modified Hardinge approach including 15 males and 4 females with an average age of (31.4±10.0) years old, 3 cases of type I by excision of the fragement, 4 cases of type I and 12 cases of type II by fixation of the fragement. Operative time, blood loss during operation and fracture healing time were observed and compared. The clinical and radiographic outcomes of the patients were measured using Thompson-Epstein scoring scale. The effect of hip reduction time of less than 6 h, 6 to12 h, and more than 12 h, the effect of surgery time within 24 h and more than 24 h after injury were compared.

RESULTS

All patients were followed up from 24 to 60 months with an average of(30.29±6.95) months. The operation time (61.96±12.22) min, blood loss (46.09±18.03) ml, and (74.74±10.06) min, blood loss (72.11±19.88) ml in lateral group in the anterior group were better than those of lateral group(<0.05). In anterior group, fracture healing time was(12.22±1.70) weeks, the results were excellent in 8 cases, good in 10 cases, fair in 4 cases and poor in 1 case, the excellent and good rate was 78.3%, the incidence of avascular necrosis of femoral head was 8.69%(2/23), and the incidence of heterotopic ossification was 13.04%(3/23). While in lateral group, the fracture healing time was(12.42±1.95) weeks, the results were excellent in 6 cases, good in 7 cases, fair in 3 cases and poor in 3 cases, the excellent and good rate was 68.4%, the incidence of avascular necrosis of femoral head was 10.53%(2/19), and the incidence of heterotopic ossification was 5.26%(1/19). There was no significant difference in fracture healing time, postoperative effect and postoperative complications between the anterior group and lateral group(<0.05). The effect of patients with reduction time of hip dislocation less than 12 h was significantly better than that of more than 12 h, there was no significant difference in the effect between reduction time within 6 h and 6 to 12 h. There was no significant difference in the outcome between surgical patients within 24 h and more than 24 h after injury.

CONCLUSIONS

Dislocated hip of Pipkin type I and II femoral head fractures should be closed reduction within 6 h. If conditions are limited, the reduction time can be accepted within 12 h. Both of modified S-P approach and modified Hardinge approach are effective in treating Pipkin type I and II femoral head fractures, and can obtain excellent outcomes. Moreover, modified S-P approach has advantage of less trauma, less blood loss, shorter operative time.

摘要

目的

比较改良Smith-Peterson(S-P)入路与改良Hardinge入路治疗Pipkin I型和II型股骨头骨折的临床效果。

方法

2005年7月至2014年7月,对42例Pipkin I型和II型股骨头骨折患者行手术治疗。前侧组23例患者采用改良S-P入路治疗,其中男17例,女6例,平均年龄(29.3±9.4)岁,I型5例行碎骨片切除,I型3例和II型15例行碎骨片固定。外侧组19例患者采用改良Hardinge入路治疗,其中男15例,女4例,平均年龄(31.4±10.0)岁,I型3例行碎骨片切除,I型4例和II型12例行碎骨片固定。观察并比较手术时间、术中出血量及骨折愈合时间。采用Thompson-Epstein评分量表评估患者的临床及影像学结果。比较髋关节复位时间小于6 h、6至12 h、大于12 h的效果,以及伤后24 h内和24 h后手术的效果。

结果

所有患者均获随访,随访时间24至60个月,平均(30.29±6.95)个月。前侧组手术时间(61.96±12.22)min、出血量(46.09±18.03)ml,外侧组手术时间(74.74±10.06)min、出血量(72.11±19.88)ml,前侧组优于外侧组(<0.05)。前侧组骨折愈合时间为(12.22±1.70)周,优8例,良10例,可4例,差1例,优良率为78.3%,股骨头缺血性坏死发生率为8.69%(2/23),异位骨化发生率为13.04%(3/23)。外侧组骨折愈合时间为(12.42±1.95)周,优6例,良7例,可3例,差3例,优良率为68.4%,股骨头缺血性坏死发生率为10.53%(2/19),异位骨化发生率为5.26%(1/19)。前侧组与外侧组骨折愈合时间、术后效果及术后并发症比较,差异无统计学意义(<0.05)。髋关节脱位复位时间小于12 h患者的效果明显优于大于12 h者,6 h内与6至12 h复位效果比较,差异无统计学意义。伤后24 h内与24 h后手术患者的疗效比较,差异无统计学意义。

结论

Pipkin I型和II型股骨头骨折脱位髋关节应在6 h内行闭合复位,若条件受限,复位时间可在12 h内。改良S-P入路和改良Hardinge入路治疗Pipkin I型和II型股骨头骨折均有效,且均可获得优良结果。此外,改良S-P入路具有创伤小、出血少、手术时间短的优点。

相似文献

1
[Treatment of Pipkin type I and II femoral head fractures through modified Smith-Peterson approach and modified Hardinge approach-a case-control studies].[采用改良Smith-Peterson入路和改良Hardinge入路治疗Pipkin I型和II型股骨头骨折——一项病例对照研究]
Zhongguo Gu Shang. 2017 Jul 25;30(7):616-621. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1003-0034.2017.07.007.
2
[Modified Hueter direct anterior approach for treatment of Pipkin type and femoral head fractures].[改良Hueter直接前路入路治疗PipkinⅠ型和Ⅱ型股骨头骨折]
Zhongguo Xiu Fu Chong Jian Wai Ke Za Zhi. 2018 Mar 15;32(3):334-337. doi: 10.7507/1002-1892.201710073.
3
Operative treatment of displaced Pipkin type I and II femoral head fractures.手术治疗移位型 PipkinⅠ型和Ⅱ型股骨头骨折。
Arch Orthop Trauma Surg. 2014 May;134(5):637-44. doi: 10.1007/s00402-014-1960-5. Epub 2014 Feb 26.
4
Management and outcome of patients with femoral head fractures: the mid-term follow-up with injuries and associated prognostic factors.股骨颈骨折患者的管理和预后:损伤及相关预后因素的中期随访。
BMC Musculoskelet Disord. 2023 Apr 20;24(1):311. doi: 10.1186/s12891-023-06317-w.
5
In Situ Reduction and Fixation of the Anterior Medial Fenestration Approach for Femoral Head Fracture.经前路内侧开窗入路治疗股骨头骨折的原位复位与固定。
Orthop Surg. 2019 Dec;11(6):1163-1172. doi: 10.1111/os.12578. Epub 2019 Nov 25.
6
[Treatment and short-term effect analysis of Pipkin fracture].[皮普金骨折的治疗及短期疗效分析]
Zhongguo Xiu Fu Chong Jian Wai Ke Za Zhi. 2009 Mar;23(3):265-7.
7
[Treatment of type IV Pipkin fracture through transtrochanteric approach with trochanteric osteotomy].经转子间入路转子截骨术治疗IV型皮普金骨折
Zhongguo Xiu Fu Chong Jian Wai Ke Za Zhi. 2011 Oct;25(10):1184-7.
8
[Treatment of Pipkin I and II hip fractures by anterolateral hip approach].[采用髋关节前外侧入路治疗 Pipkin I 型和 II 型髋关节骨折]
Zhongguo Gu Shang. 2018 Sep 25;31(9):858-862. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1003-0034.2018.09.015.
9
Comparison of the modified Heuter approach and the Kocher-Langenbeck approach in the treatment of Pipkin type I and type II femoral head fractures.改良 Heuter 入路与 Kocher-Langenbeck 入路治疗 Pipkin Ⅰ型和Ⅱ型股骨头骨折的比较。
Int Orthop. 2019 Nov;43(11):2613-2620. doi: 10.1007/s00264-019-04301-5. Epub 2019 Jan 25.
10
Dislocated intra-articular femoral head fracture associated with fracture-dislocation of the hip and acetabulum: report of 12 cases and technical notes on surgical intervention.髋关节与髋臼骨折脱位相关的关节内股骨头脱位骨折:12例报告及手术干预技术要点
Eur J Orthop Surg Traumatol. 2013 Jul;23(5):557-64. doi: 10.1007/s00590-012-1027-7. Epub 2012 Jul 5.

引用本文的文献

1
Comparison of the efficacy of the modified S-P approach and the Ganz method for surgical hip dislocation in Pipkin I fractures: an early follow-up study.改良 S-P 法与 Ganz 法治疗 Pipkin I 型骨折行髋关节脱位手术的疗效比较:一项早期随访研究
BMC Musculoskelet Disord. 2025 Feb 4;26(1):116. doi: 10.1186/s12891-025-08380-x.
2
Safe Surgical Dislocation and Open Reduction, Internal Fixation with Herbert Screw for Pipkin's Fracture Head of Femur in an Obese Patient: An Interesting Case Report.肥胖患者股骨小头Pipkin骨折的安全手术脱位及Herbert螺钉切开复位内固定术:1例有趣的病例报告
Cureus. 2022 Dec 3;14(12):e32171. doi: 10.7759/cureus.32171. eCollection 2022 Dec.
3
Safety of surgical hip dislocation in femoral head fracture and dislocation (FHFD) and avascular necrosis risk factor analysis of FHFD: midterm results confirmed by SPECT/CT and MRI.
手术髋关节脱位治疗股骨头骨折和脱位(FHFD)的安全性及 FHFD 发生缺血性坏死的危险因素分析:SPECT/CT 和 MRI 的中期结果证实。
J Orthop Surg Res. 2022 May 16;17(1):278. doi: 10.1186/s13018-022-03160-y.
4
[Analysis of effectiveness of greater trochanteric osteotomy approach and K-L posterior approach in patients with type Pipkin fracture].[股骨大转子截骨入路与K-L后入路治疗PipkinⅠ型骨折的疗效分析]
Zhongguo Xiu Fu Chong Jian Wai Ke Za Zhi. 2020 Oct 15;34(10):1258-1262. doi: 10.7507/1002-1892.202003059.