Suppr超能文献

使用风险比的替代指标评估 2 型糖尿病患者使用胰高血糖素样肽 1 受体激动剂的心血管风险。

Assessment of Cardiovascular Risk With Glucagon-Like Peptide 1 Receptor Agonists in Patients With Type 2 Diabetes Using an Alternative Measure to the Hazard Ratio.

机构信息

1 Kitasato University, Tokyo, Japan.

出版信息

Ann Pharmacother. 2018 Jul;52(7):632-638. doi: 10.1177/1060028018757407. Epub 2018 Feb 9.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

Randomized clinical trials with the aim of evaluating the cardiovascular risks associated with glucagon-like peptide 1 (GLP-1) receptor agonists, lixisenatide, liraglutide, semaglutide, and exenatide, have been conducted. They showed different results among the agents, but the reason has not been explained.

OBJECTIVE

To evaluate the cardiovascular risks associated with GLP-1 receptor agonists by using an alternative measure to the hazard ratio.

METHODS

We used the difference in restricted mean survival time (RMST) as a measure of cardiovascular risks. Four randomized clinical trials with cardiovascular events as a primary endpoint, ELIXA (lixisenatide), LEADER (liraglutide), SUSTAIN-6 (semaglutide), and EXSCEL (exenatide), were reevaluated by estimating the RMSTs for each of the agents and placebo based on the reconstructed individual patient data for each time-to-event outcome from publicly available information.

RESULTS

The differences of RMSTs (GLP-1 receptor agonist minus placebo: point estimate and 95% CI) for primary composite endpoint of cardiovascular events were 0 days [-14, 14] in ELIXA (1080 days follow-up), 20 days [6, 34] in LEADER (1620 days follow-up), 8 days [1, 15] in SUSTAIN-6 (672 days follow-up), and 11 days [-3, 26] in EXSCEL (1825 days follow-up). As for the risk of other cardiovascular outcomes, there were no substantial differences between GLP-1 receptor agonists and placebo.

CONCLUSIONS

Liraglutide and semaglutide decrease the risk of major adverse cardiovascular events compared with placebo when using the difference in RMST. The previously reported result that GLP-1 receptor agonists do not increase the risk of cardiovascular outcomes compared with placebo is also confirmed.

摘要

背景

已经开展了随机临床试验,旨在评估胰高血糖素样肽 1 (GLP-1) 受体激动剂利西那肽、利拉鲁肽、司美格鲁肽和艾塞那肽与心血管风险相关的情况。这些试验在不同药物之间得出了不同的结果,但原因尚未得到解释。

目的

使用风险比以外的替代指标来评估 GLP-1 受体激动剂与心血管风险的相关性。

方法

我们使用受限平均生存时间 (RMST) 的差值作为心血管风险的衡量标准。重新评估了四项以心血管事件为主要终点的随机临床试验,即 ELIXA(利西那肽)、LEADER(利拉鲁肽)、SUSTAIN-6(司美格鲁肽)和 EXSCEL(艾塞那肽),根据从公开信息中获得的每个时间至事件结局的个体患者数据,估计每个药物和安慰剂的 RMST。

结果

ELIXA(1080 天随访)中主要复合心血管事件终点的 RMST 差值(GLP-1 受体激动剂减去安慰剂:点估计值和 95%CI)为 0 天 [-14, 14],LEADER(1620 天随访)为 20 天 [6, 34],SUSTAIN-6(672 天随访)为 8 天 [1, 15],EXSCEL(1825 天随访)为 11 天 [-3, 26]。对于其他心血管结局的风险,GLP-1 受体激动剂与安慰剂之间没有显著差异。

结论

与安慰剂相比,利拉鲁肽和司美格鲁肽使用 RMST 差值可降低主要不良心血管事件的风险。也证实了先前报告的 GLP-1 受体激动剂与安慰剂相比不会增加心血管结局风险的结果。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验