Department of Sociology, University of Surrey, Guildford, UK.
Soc Stud Sci. 2018 Feb;48(1):125-148. doi: 10.1177/0306312718757081.
The 2006 'Consensus statement on management of intersex disorders' recommended moving to a new classification of intersex variations, framed in terms of 'disorders of sex development' or DSD. Part of the rationale for this change was to move away from associations with gender, and to increase clarity by grounding the classification system in genetics. While the medical community has largely accepted the move, some individuals from intersex activist communities have condemned it. In addition, people both inside and outside the medical community have disagreed about what should be covered by the classification system, in particular whether sex chromosome variations and the related diagnoses of Turner and Klinefelter's syndromes should be included. This article explores initial descriptions of Turner and Klinefelter's syndromes and their subsequent inclusion in intersex classifications, which were increasingly grounded in scientific understandings of sex chromosomes that emerged in the 1950s. The article questions the current drive to stabilize and 'sort out' intersex classifications through a grounding in genetics. Alternative social and historical definitions of intersex - such as those proposed by the intersex activists - have the potential to do more justice to the lived experience of those affected by such classifications and their consequences.
2006 年的“性发育障碍管理共识声明”建议采用一种新的性发育障碍分类,以“性别发育障碍”或 DSD 为框架。这一转变的部分原因是为了避免与性别相关联,并通过将分类系统建立在遗传学基础上,增加清晰度。虽然医学界已经基本接受了这一转变,但一些来自性发育障碍活动家社区的人谴责了这一转变。此外,医学界内外的人对分类系统应该涵盖哪些内容存在分歧,特别是性染色体变异以及特纳和克莱恩费尔特综合征相关诊断是否应该包括在内。本文探讨了特纳和克莱恩费尔特综合征的最初描述及其随后被纳入性发育障碍分类,这些分类越来越基于 20 世纪 50 年代出现的对性染色体的科学理解。本文质疑当前通过遗传学基础来稳定和“梳理”性发育障碍分类的做法。替代性的社会和历史定义,例如性发育障碍活动家提出的定义,有可能更公正地对待受此类分类及其后果影响的人的生活体验。