School of Chemistry and Molecular Biosciences , University of Queensland , 4072 Brisbane , Australia.
Institute for Molecular Bioscience , University of Queensland , 4072 Brisbane , Australia.
J Chem Inf Model. 2018 Mar 26;58(3):630-640. doi: 10.1021/acs.jcim.7b00353. Epub 2018 Feb 20.
Molecular dynamics simulations and free energy calculations have been used to investigate the effect of ligand binding on the enantioselectivity of an epoxide hydrolase (EH) from Aspergillus niger. Despite sharing a common mechanism, a wide range of alternative mechanisms have been proposed to explain the origin of enantiomeric selectivity in EHs. By comparing the interactions of ( R)- and ( S)-glycidyl phenyl ether (GPE) with both the wild type (WT, E = 3) and a mutant showing enhanced enantioselectivity to GPE (LW202, E = 193), we have examined whether enantioselectivity is due to differences in the binding pose, the affinity for the ( R)- or ( S)- enantiomers, or a kinetic effect. The two enantiomers were easily accommodated within the binding pockets of the WT enzyme and LW202. Free energy calculations suggested that neither enzyme had a preference for a given enantiomer. The two substrates sampled a wide variety of conformations in the simulations with the sterically hindered and unhindered carbon atoms of the GPE epoxide ring both coming in close proximity to the nucleophilic aspartic acid residue. This suggests that alternative pathways could lead to the formation of a ( S)- and ( R)-diol product. Together, the calculations suggest that the enantioselectivity is due to kinetic rather than thermodynamic effects and that the assumption that one substrate results in one product when interpreting the available experimental data and deriving E-values may be inappropriate in the case of EHs.
运用分子动力学模拟和自由能计算研究了配体结合对黑曲霉环氧化物水解酶(EH)对映选择性的影响。尽管具有共同的机制,但已提出了广泛的替代机制来解释 EHs 对映选择性的起源。通过比较(R)-和(S)-缩水甘油基苯基醚(GPE)与野生型(WT,E=3)和对 GPE 具有增强对映选择性的突变体(LW202,E=193)的相互作用,我们检查了对映选择性是否归因于结合构象、对(R)-或(S)-对映体的亲和力或动力学效应的差异。两种对映体很容易容纳在 WT 酶和 LW202 的结合口袋中。自由能计算表明,两种酶都没有对给定的对映体表现出偏好。两种底物在模拟中采样了广泛的构象,GPE 环氧化物环的空间位阻和无阻碳原子都与亲核天冬氨酸残基接近。这表明替代途径可能导致(S)-和(R)-二醇产物的形成。综上所述,计算结果表明,对映选择性是由于动力学而不是热力学效应所致,并且在解释可用的实验数据和推导 E 值时,假设一种底物产生一种产物的情况可能不适合 EHs。