Suppr超能文献

Comparative analysis of two volumetrical ultrafiltration monitors for hemodialysis.

作者信息

Berden J H, Wokke J M, Koene R A

出版信息

Int J Artif Organs. 1986 May;9(3):163-6.

PMID:2942491
Abstract

Controlled ultrafiltration (UF) during hemodialysis may prevent dialysis associated hypotension. A prerequisite for controlled ultrafiltration is an accurate measurement of ultrafiltration. Volumetric measurement is the best currently available method for this purpose. In this study we compared in a clinical setting two volumetric ultrafiltration monitors (UFM): one device constructed in our hospital using oval flow-meters (UFM-N) and the other using electromagnetic flow transducers (UFM-G: UFM 10-2, Gambro Lund Sweden). The UF measurements of both UFM's were compared with UF calculated from bed scales weight monitoring and standard scales determinations. During dual needle hemodialysis (n = 8) with a hollow fiber dialyzer the accuracy of the UFM-N was 91% and that of the UFM-G 97%. During dual needle dialysis with a parallel flow dialyzer the UFM-N appeared to be more sensitive for pulsatile changes in the dialysate flow due to the greater compliance of this type of dialyzer. The accuracy of the UFM-N in this setting was 80%, while that of the UFM-G was 87% (n = 11). During single needle dialysis with a parallel flow dialyzer (n = 14) only the UFM-G was tested and it measured UF with an accuracy of 92%. Finally the UFM-G can control UF actively by adjusting the TMP to obtain a given UF rate. The accuracy of the UFM-G in this setting was 94%, and the linear regression correlation coefficient between planned UF and actually obtained UF was 0.974 (n = 61). In conclusion volumetric monitoring of UF is accurate and reliable, but its accuracy is dependent on the type of dialyzer used.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)

摘要

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验