Suppr超能文献

第三代短鞘冷冻球囊肺静脉隔离中以隔离时间指导冷冻时间滴定 - 可比的临床结果和更短的手术时间。

Time-to-isolation guided titration of freeze duration in 3rd generation short-tip cryoballoon pulmonary vein isolation - Comparable clinical outcome and shorter procedure duration.

机构信息

Department of Medicine II, Ulm University Medical Center, Ulm, Germany.

Department of Medicine II, Ulm University Medical Center, Ulm, Germany.

出版信息

Int J Cardiol. 2018 Mar 15;255:80-84. doi: 10.1016/j.ijcard.2017.11.039.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

The optimal freeze duration in cryoballoon pulmonary vein isolation (PVI) is unknown. The 3rd generation cryoballoon facilitates observation of the time-to-isolation (TTI) and thereby enables individualized cryoenergy titration. To evaluate the efficacy of an individualized freeze duration we compared the clinical outcome of patients treated with a TTI-guided ablation protocol to the outcome of patients treated with a fixed ablation protocol.

METHODS

We compared 100 patients treated with the 3rd generation cryoballoon applying a TTI-based protocol (TTI group) to 100 patients treated by a fixed freeze protocol (fixed group). In the fixed group a 240s freeze cycle was followed by a 240s bonus freeze after acute PV isolation. In the TTI group freeze duration was 180s if TTI was ≥30s and reduced to only 120s, if TTI was <30s. In case of a TTI >60s a 180s bonus freeze was applied.

RESULTS

Freedom from atrial arrhythmia recurrence off class I/III antiarrhythmic drugs after one year was not different between the TTI group (73.6%) and the fixed group (75.7%; p=0.75). Mean procedure duration was 85.8±27.3min in the TTI group compared to 115.7±27.1min in the fixed group (p<0.001). Mean fluoroscopy time was 17.5±6.6min in the TTI group and 22.5±9.8min in the fixed group (p<0.001).

CONCLUSIONS

TTI-guided cryoenergy titration leads to reduced procedure duration and fluoroscopy time and appears to be as effective as a fixed ablation strategy. A single 2-minute freeze seems to be sufficient in case of short TTI.

摘要

背景

冷冻球囊肺静脉隔离(PVI)的最佳冷冻时间尚不清楚。第三代冷冻球囊有助于观察隔离时间(TTI),从而实现个体化冷冻能量滴定。为了评估个体化冷冻时间的疗效,我们比较了采用 TTI 指导消融方案治疗的患者和采用固定消融方案治疗的患者的临床结果。

方法

我们比较了 100 例采用第三代冷冻球囊行 TTI 指导消融方案(TTI 组)的患者和 100 例采用固定冷冻方案(固定组)的患者。在固定组中,240 秒冷冻周期后,急性 PV 隔离后进行 240 秒的附加冷冻。在 TTI 组中,如果 TTI≥30s,则冷冻时间为 180s,如果 TTI<30s,则冷冻时间缩短至 120s。如果 TTI>60s,则应用 180 秒附加冷冻。

结果

一年后,无抗心律失常药物 I/III 类药物复发的房性心律失常的发生率,TTI 组(73.6%)与固定组(75.7%;p=0.75)无差异。TTI 组的平均手术时间为 85.8±27.3min,而固定组为 115.7±27.1min(p<0.001)。TTI 组的平均透视时间为 17.5±6.6min,而固定组为 22.5±9.8min(p<0.001)。

结论

TTI 指导的冷冻能量滴定可减少手术时间和透视时间,且与固定消融策略一样有效。如果 TTI 较短,单次 2 分钟的冷冻似乎就足够了。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验