Department of Pediatrics, University of Chicago Pritzker School of Medicine, Chicago, Ill.
Department of Pediatrics, Virginia Commonwealth University School of Medicine, Richmond, Va.
Acad Pediatr. 2018 Jul;18(5):485-492. doi: 10.1016/j.acap.2018.01.015. Epub 2018 Feb 6.
Education, like clinical medicine, should be based on the most current evidence in the field. Unfortunately, medical educators can be overwhelmed by the sheer volume and range of resources for this literature. This article provides an overview of 15 articles from 2016 that the authors consider the top articles in the field of pediatric medical education. The 7 authors, all medical educators with combined leadership and expertise across the continuum of pediatric medical education, used an iterative 3-stage process to review more than 6339 abstracts published in 2016. This process was designed to identify a small subset of articles that were most relevant to educational practices and most applicable to pediatric medical education. In the first 2 stages, pairs of authors independently reviewed and scored abstracts in 13 medical education-related journals and reached consensus to identify the articles that best met these criteria. In the final stage, all articles were discussed using a group consensus model to select the final articles included in this review. This article presents summaries of the 15 articles that were selected. The results revealed a cluster of studies related to observed standardized clinical encounters, self-assessment, professionalism, clinical teaching, competencies/milestones, and graduate medical education management strategies. We provide suggestions on how medical educators can apply the findings to their own practice and educational settings. This narrative review offers a useful tool for educators interested in keeping informed about the most relevant and valuable information in the field.
教育，如同临床医学一样，应该以该领域内最新的证据为基础。不幸的是，医学教育者可能会被大量的医学教育文献和资源所淹没。本文概述了 2016 年的 15 篇文章，作者认为这些文章是儿科学医学教育领域的顶级文章。这 7 位作者均为医学教育者，在儿科学医学教育的各个方面都具有领导力和专业知识，他们采用迭代的 3 阶段流程来审查 2016 年发表的超过 6339 篇摘要。该流程旨在确定一小部分与教育实践最相关且最适用于儿科学医学教育的文章。在第 1 阶段和第 2 阶段，2 对作者分别独立审查并为 13 种医学教育相关期刊中的摘要评分，并达成共识，以确定最符合这些标准的文章。在第 3 阶段，所有文章都使用小组共识模型进行讨论，以选择包含在本次综述中的最终文章。本文介绍了这 15 篇文章的摘要。研究结果显示出一系列与观察到的标准化临床会诊、自我评估、专业精神、临床教学、能力/里程碑以及毕业后医学教育管理策略相关的研究。我们就如何将研究结果应用于自身实践和教育环境提出了建议。本综述提供了一个有用的工具，可供对了解该领域内最相关和最有价值的信息感兴趣的教育者使用。
