• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

根据最近德国前列腺癌 S3 指南,对接受开腹经耻骨后与腹腔镜或机器人辅助根治性前列腺切除术的患者进行盆腔淋巴结清扫的指南依从性进行多中心评估。

Multicenter evaluation of guideline adherence for pelvic lymph node dissection in patients undergoing open retropubic vs. laparoscopic or robot assisted radical prostatectomy according to the recent German S3 guideline on prostate cancer.

机构信息

Department of Urology, University Hospital Carl Gustav Carus, Technische Universität Dresden, Fetscherstrasse 74, 01307, Dresden, Germany.

Department of Urology, Caritas St. Josef Medical Center, University Regensburg, Landshuter Strasse 64, 93053, Regensburg, Germany.

出版信息

World J Urol. 2018 Jun;36(6):855-861. doi: 10.1007/s00345-018-2195-9. Epub 2018 Feb 9.

DOI:10.1007/s00345-018-2195-9
PMID:29427005
Abstract

PURPOSE

Pelvic lymph node dissection (PLND) is recommended for patients with prostate cancer (PCa) and significant risk for nodal metastases. This study aimed to assess guideline adherence regarding PLND according to the German S3 guideline as example for a national but highly used guideline on prostate cancer and to compare the rate of complications different approaches for radical prostatectomy (RP).

METHODS

Patients undergoing open (RRP), laparoscopic (LARP) or robot-assisted (RARP) RP in six centers in Germany and Austria were included. The primary endpoint was the total number of removed lymph nodes (LN) between the different surgical approaches according to recent guideline recommendations. Secondary endpoints were the number of patients undergoing a sufficient PLND, defined as a removal of at least 10 LN and associated complication rates.

RESULTS

2634 patients undergoing RP were included (RRP: 66%, RARP/LARP: 34%). PLND was performed in 88% (RRP: 88.5%, RARP/LARP: 86.8%, p = 0.208). In intermediateor high risk PCa, PLND was performed in 97.2% (RRP: 97.7%, RARP/LARP: 96.2, p = 0.048). Of those, the mean number of LN was 19 (RRP: 19 vs. RARP/LARP: 17, p < 0.005) and sufficient PLND was observed in 84.6% of RRP compared to 77.2% of RARP/LARP (p < 0.005). Symptomatic lymphoceles requiring surgical treatment occurred more often in RRP than in RARP/LARP (4.0% vs. 1.6%, p = 0.001).

CONCLUSIONS

The general guideline adherence regarding performing PNLD and the LN yield is high, regardless of the surgical approach. As expected, lymph node yield was higher when very experienced surgeons conducted the procedure. This should be considered in patients' counseling.

摘要

目的

盆腔淋巴结清扫术(PLND)推荐用于前列腺癌(PCa)患者和有淋巴结转移高风险的患者。本研究旨在评估德国 S3 指南中规定的 PLND 指南遵循情况,该指南是前列腺癌的国家指南,但应用非常广泛,并比较不同根治性前列腺切除术(RP)方法的并发症发生率。

方法

纳入德国和奥地利 6 个中心接受开放(RRP)、腹腔镜(LARP)或机器人辅助(RARP)RP 的患者。主要终点是根据最新指南建议,不同手术方法之间切除的淋巴结总数(LN)。次要终点是接受充分 PLND 的患者数量,定义为至少切除 10 个 LN,并评估相关并发症发生率。

结果

共纳入 2634 例接受 RP 的患者(RRP:66%,RARP/LARP:34%)。88%(RRP:88.5%,RARP/LARP:86.8%,p=0.208)的患者接受了 PLND。中高危 PCa 患者中,97.2%(RRP:97.7%,RARP/LARP:96.2%,p=0.048)接受了 PLND。其中,LN 的平均数量为 19(RRP:19 vs. RARP/LARP:17,p<0.005),RRP 中 84.6%的患者接受了充分的 PLND,而 RARP/LARP 中只有 77.2%(p<0.005)。需要手术治疗的症状性淋巴囊肿在 RRP 中比在 RARP/LARP 中更常见(4.0% vs. 1.6%,p=0.001)。

结论

无论手术方式如何,进行 PLND 和 LN 检测的总体指南遵循情况都很高。正如预期的那样,当经验非常丰富的外科医生进行手术时,淋巴结的检出量更高。这在患者咨询时需要考虑。

相似文献

1
Multicenter evaluation of guideline adherence for pelvic lymph node dissection in patients undergoing open retropubic vs. laparoscopic or robot assisted radical prostatectomy according to the recent German S3 guideline on prostate cancer.根据最近德国前列腺癌 S3 指南,对接受开腹经耻骨后与腹腔镜或机器人辅助根治性前列腺切除术的患者进行盆腔淋巴结清扫的指南依从性进行多中心评估。
World J Urol. 2018 Jun;36(6):855-861. doi: 10.1007/s00345-018-2195-9. Epub 2018 Feb 9.
2
Adherence of the indication to European Association of Urology guideline recommended pelvic lymph node dissection at a high-volume center: Differences between open and robot-assisted radical prostatectomy.该适应症符合欧洲泌尿外科协会指南推荐,在高容量中心进行盆腔淋巴结清扫:开放性与机器人辅助根治性前列腺切除术的差异。
Eur J Surg Oncol. 2015 Nov;41(11):1547-53. doi: 10.1016/j.ejso.2015.05.008. Epub 2015 Jun 1.
3
Pelvic lymph node dissection during robot-assisted radical prostatectomy: efficacy, limitations, and complications-a systematic review of the literature.机器人辅助根治性前列腺切除术时的盆腔淋巴结清扫术:疗效、局限性和并发症——文献系统评价。
Eur Urol. 2014 Jan;65(1):7-16. doi: 10.1016/j.eururo.2013.03.057. Epub 2013 Apr 6.
4
Development of symptomatic lymphoceles after radical prostatectomy and pelvic lymph node dissection is independent of surgical approach: a single-center analysis.根治性前列腺切除术和盆腔淋巴结清扫术后症状性淋巴囊肿的发生与手术方式无关:单中心分析。
Int Urol Nephrol. 2019 Apr;51(4):633-640. doi: 10.1007/s11255-019-02103-7. Epub 2019 Feb 22.
5
Indication for and extension of pelvic lymph node dissection during robot-assisted radical prostatectomy: an analysis of five European institutions.机器人辅助根治性前列腺切除术时盆腔淋巴结清扫的适应证和范围:来自五家欧洲机构的分析。
Eur Urol. 2014 Oct;66(4):635-43. doi: 10.1016/j.eururo.2013.12.059. Epub 2014 Jan 4.
6
The impact of robot-assisted radical prostatectomy on the use and extent of pelvic lymph node dissection in the "post-dissemination" period.机器人辅助根治性前列腺切除术对“播散后”时期盆腔淋巴结清扫术的应用及范围的影响
Eur J Surg Oncol. 2014 Sep;40(9):1080-6. doi: 10.1016/j.ejso.2013.12.016. Epub 2014 Jan 2.
7
The impact of robotic surgery on pelvic lymph node dissection during radical prostatectomy for localized prostate cancer: the Brown University early robotic experience.机器人手术对局限性前列腺癌根治性前列腺切除术中盆腔淋巴结清扫的影响:布朗大学早期机器人手术经验
Can J Urol. 2009 Oct;16(5):4842-6.
8
Impact of the introduction of a robotic training programme on prostate cancer stage migration at a single tertiary referral centre.机器人培训项目对单一三级转诊中心前列腺癌分期迁移的影响。
BJU Int. 2013 Jun;111(8):1222-30. doi: 10.1111/j.1464-410X.2012.11464.x. Epub 2012 Nov 13.
9
Assessment of lymph node yield after pelvic lymph node dissection in men with prostate cancer: a comparison between robot-assisted radical prostatectomy and open radical prostatectomy in the modern era.评估前列腺癌患者行盆腔淋巴结清扫术后的淋巴结检出量:机器人辅助根治性前列腺切除术与开放根治性前列腺切除术在现代的比较。
J Endourol. 2010 Jul;24(7):1055-60. doi: 10.1089/end.2010.0128.
10
Adherence to pelvic lymph node dissection recommendations according to the National Comprehensive Cancer Network pelvic lymph node dissection guideline and the D'Amico lymph node invasion risk stratification.根据美国国立综合癌症网络盆腔淋巴结清扫指南和达米科淋巴结侵犯风险分层,遵循盆腔淋巴结清扫建议。
Urol Oncol. 2018 Feb;36(2):81.e17-81.e24. doi: 10.1016/j.urolonc.2017.10.022. Epub 2017 Dec 14.

引用本文的文献

1
The role and controversy of pelvic lymph node dissection in prostate cancer treatment: a focused review.盆腔淋巴结清扫术在前列腺癌治疗中的作用和争议:重点综述。
World J Surg Oncol. 2024 Feb 26;22(1):68. doi: 10.1186/s12957-024-03344-2.

本文引用的文献

1
Extended versus Standard Pelvic Lymph Node Dissection in Radical Prostatectomy on Oncological and Functional Outcomes: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.根治性前列腺切除术中扩大盆腔淋巴结清扫与标准盆腔淋巴结清扫对肿瘤学和功能结局的影响:一项系统评价和荟萃分析
Ann Surg Oncol. 2017 Jul;24(7):2047-2054. doi: 10.1245/s10434-017-5822-6. Epub 2017 Mar 7.
2
Comparing conventional laparoscopic to robotic-assisted extended pelvic lymph node dissection in men with intermediate and high-risk prostate cancer: a matched-pair analysis.比较传统腹腔镜与机器人辅助扩大盆腔淋巴结清扫术治疗中高危前列腺癌男性患者:配对分析
Minerva Urol Nefrol. 2017 Feb;69(1):101-107. doi: 10.23736/S0393-2249.16.02799-5. Epub 2016 Nov 10.
3
Suboptimal use of pelvic lymph node dissection: Differences in guideline adherence between robot-assisted and open radical prostatectomy.
盆腔淋巴结清扫术的使用欠佳:机器人辅助根治性前列腺切除术与开放性根治性前列腺切除术在指南遵循方面的差异。
Can Urol Assoc J. 2016 Aug;10(7-8):269-276. doi: 10.5489/cuaj.3563.
4
EAU-ESTRO-SIOG Guidelines on Prostate Cancer. Part II: Treatment of Relapsing, Metastatic, and Castration-Resistant Prostate Cancer.EAU-ESTRO-SIOG 前列腺癌诊治指南。第二部分:复发、转移和去势抵抗性前列腺癌的治疗。
Eur Urol. 2017 Apr;71(4):630-642. doi: 10.1016/j.eururo.2016.08.002. Epub 2016 Aug 31.
5
EAU-ESTRO-SIOG Guidelines on Prostate Cancer. Part 1: Screening, Diagnosis, and Local Treatment with Curative Intent.EAU-ESTRO-SIOG 前列腺癌诊治指南。第 1 部分:筛查、诊断及有治愈意图的局部治疗。
Eur Urol. 2017 Apr;71(4):618-629. doi: 10.1016/j.eururo.2016.08.003. Epub 2016 Aug 25.
6
Robots drive the German radical prostatectomy market: a total population analysis from 2006 to 2013.机器人推动德国根治性前列腺切除术市场:2006 年至 2013 年的全人群分析。
Prostate Cancer Prostatic Dis. 2016 Dec;19(4):412-416. doi: 10.1038/pcan.2016.34. Epub 2016 Aug 23.
7
Prostate Cancer, Version 1.2016.前列腺癌临床实践指南(2016 年版)
J Natl Compr Canc Netw. 2016 Jan;14(1):19-30. doi: 10.6004/jnccn.2016.0004.
8
Best evidence regarding the superiority or inferiority of robot-assisted radical prostatectomy.关于机器人辅助根治性前列腺切除术优越性或劣性的最佳证据。
Urol Clin North Am. 2014 Nov;41(4):493-502. doi: 10.1016/j.ucl.2014.07.004. Epub 2014 Aug 19.
9
Indication for and extension of pelvic lymph node dissection during robot-assisted radical prostatectomy: an analysis of five European institutions.机器人辅助根治性前列腺切除术时盆腔淋巴结清扫的适应证和范围:来自五家欧洲机构的分析。
Eur Urol. 2014 Oct;66(4):635-43. doi: 10.1016/j.eururo.2013.12.059. Epub 2014 Jan 4.
10
Pelvic lymph node dissection during robot-assisted radical prostatectomy: efficacy, limitations, and complications-a systematic review of the literature.机器人辅助根治性前列腺切除术时的盆腔淋巴结清扫术:疗效、局限性和并发症——文献系统评价。
Eur Urol. 2014 Jan;65(1):7-16. doi: 10.1016/j.eururo.2013.03.057. Epub 2013 Apr 6.