• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

生物质整体煤气化联合循环发电系统的比较研究:性能分析。

A comparative study of biomass integrated gasification combined cycle power systems: Performance analysis.

机构信息

Department of Mechanical and Industrial Engineering, The University of Iowa, Iowa, IA 52242, USA.

Department of Mechanical and Industrial Engineering, The University of Iowa, Iowa, IA 52242, USA.

出版信息

Bioresour Technol. 2018 May;255:246-256. doi: 10.1016/j.biortech.2018.01.093. Epub 2018 Feb 2.

DOI:10.1016/j.biortech.2018.01.093
PMID:29427876
Abstract

The Biomass Integrated Gasification Combined Cycle (BIGCC) power system is believed to potentially be a highly efficient way to utilize biomass to generate power. However, there is no comparative study of BIGCC systems that examines all the latest improvements for gasification agents, gas turbine combustion methods, and CO Capture and Storage options. This study examines the impact of recent advancements on BIGCC performance through exergy analysis using Aspen Plus. Results show that the exergy efficiency of these systems is ranged from 22.3% to 37.1%. Furthermore, exergy analysis indicates that the gas turbine with external combustion has relatively high exergy efficiency, and Selexol CO removal method has low exergy destruction. Moreover, the sensitivity analysis shows that the system exergy efficiency is more sensitive to the initial temperature and pressure ratio of the gas turbine, whereas has a relatively weak dependence on the initial temperature and initial pressure of the steam turbine.

摘要

生物质一体化煤气化联合循环(BIGCC)发电系统被认为是一种利用生物质发电的高效方式。然而,目前还没有对 BIGCC 系统的比较研究,该研究考察了气化剂、燃气轮机燃烧方法以及 CO 捕集和封存方案的最新改进。本研究使用 Aspen Plus 通过火用分析来研究最近的技术进步对 BIGCC 性能的影响。结果表明,这些系统的火用效率范围为 22.3%至 37.1%。此外,火用分析表明,带外部燃烧的燃气轮机具有相对较高的火用效率,而 Selexol CO 去除方法的火用破坏较低。此外,敏感性分析表明,系统的火用效率对燃气轮机的初始温度和压力比更为敏感,而对蒸汽轮机的初始温度和初始压力的依赖性相对较弱。

相似文献

1
A comparative study of biomass integrated gasification combined cycle power systems: Performance analysis.生物质整体煤气化联合循环发电系统的比较研究:性能分析。
Bioresour Technol. 2018 May;255:246-256. doi: 10.1016/j.biortech.2018.01.093. Epub 2018 Feb 2.
2
Biomass gasification-gas turbine combustion for power generation system model based on ASPEN PLUS.基于 ASPEN PLUS 的生物质气化-燃气轮机燃烧发电系统模型。
Sci Total Environ. 2018 Jul 1;628-629:1278-1286. doi: 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2018.02.159. Epub 2018 Feb 20.
3
Exergoeconomic Analysis and Optimization of a Biomass Integrated Gasification Combined Cycle Based on Externally Fired Gas Turbine, Steam Rankine Cycle, Organic Rankine Cycle, and Absorption Refrigeration Cycle.基于外燃式燃气轮机、蒸汽朗肯循环、有机朗肯循环和吸收式制冷循环的生物质集成气化联合循环的火用经济分析与优化
Entropy (Basel). 2024 Jun 12;26(6):511. doi: 10.3390/e26060511.
4
On a clean power generation system with the co-gasification of biomass and coal in a quadruple fluidized bed gasifier.在一个采用生物质与煤共气化的四重流化床气化炉的清洁能源发电系统中。
Bioresour Technol. 2017 Jul;235:113-121. doi: 10.1016/j.biortech.2017.03.087. Epub 2017 Mar 18.
5
Performance assessment and multiobjective optimization of a biomass waste-fired gasification combined cycle for emission reduction.生物质废弃物燃烧气化联合循环的减排性能评估与多目标优化。
Chemosphere. 2023 Sep;334:138980. doi: 10.1016/j.chemosphere.2023.138980. Epub 2023 May 17.
6
Thermodynamic analyses of a biomass-coal co-gasification power generation system.生物质-煤共气化发电系统的热力学分析。
Bioresour Technol. 2016 Apr;205:133-41. doi: 10.1016/j.biortech.2016.01.049. Epub 2016 Jan 23.
7
Equilibrium model analysis of waste plastics gasification using CO and steam.利用 CO 和蒸汽对废塑料气化的平衡模型分析。
Waste Manag Res. 2017 Dec;35(12):1247-1253. doi: 10.1177/0734242X17736946. Epub 2017 Nov 3.
8
Towards an environmentally friendly power and hydrogen co-generation system: Integration of solar-based sorption enhanced gasification with in-situ CO capture and liquefaction process.迈向环保的电力与氢气联产系统:太阳能吸附增强气化与原位 CO 捕集及液化工艺的集成。
Chemosphere. 2023 Dec;343:140226. doi: 10.1016/j.chemosphere.2023.140226. Epub 2023 Sep 21.
9
Reduction in environmental CO by utilization of optimized energy scheme for power and fresh water generations based on different uses of biomass energy.通过基于生物质能源的不同用途采用优化的能源方案来发电和生产淡水,从而减少环境中的二氧化碳排放。
Chemosphere. 2023 Apr;319:137847. doi: 10.1016/j.chemosphere.2023.137847. Epub 2023 Jan 16.
10
Energy, exergy and economic analyses of a novel biomass fueled power plant with carbon capture and sequestration.具有碳捕获与封存功能的新型生物质燃料发电厂的能量、㶲及经济分析。
Sci Total Environ. 2019 Nov 10;690:812-820. doi: 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2019.07.015. Epub 2019 Jul 3.

引用本文的文献

1
Exergoeconomic Analysis and Optimization of a Biomass Integrated Gasification Combined Cycle Based on Externally Fired Gas Turbine, Steam Rankine Cycle, Organic Rankine Cycle, and Absorption Refrigeration Cycle.基于外燃式燃气轮机、蒸汽朗肯循环、有机朗肯循环和吸收式制冷循环的生物质集成气化联合循环的火用经济分析与优化
Entropy (Basel). 2024 Jun 12;26(6):511. doi: 10.3390/e26060511.
2
Energetic, exergetic, economic and environmental performance of a rice husk gasification based carbon negative combined power and cooling plant.基于稻壳气化的负碳热电联产厂的能量、㶲、经济及环境性能
Heliyon. 2023 Dec 1;10(1):e23070. doi: 10.1016/j.heliyon.2023.e23070. eCollection 2024 Jan 15.