Toronto Rehabilitation Institute - University Health Network, Toronto, ON, Canada; Faculty of Medicine, Rehabilitation Sciences Institute, University of Toronto, Toronto, ON, Canada; Department of Communication Sciences and Disorders, Adelphi University, Garden City, NY, Australia.
Toronto Rehabilitation Institute - University Health Network, Toronto, ON, Canada; Faculty of Medicine, Rehabilitation Sciences Institute, University of Toronto, Toronto, ON, Canada; Department of Communication Sciences and Disorders, Adelphi University, Garden City, NY, Australia.
Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 2018 May;99(5):934-944. doi: 10.1016/j.apmr.2018.01.012. Epub 2018 Feb 8.
To assess consensual validity, interrater reliability, and criterion validity of the International Dysphagia Diet Standardisation Initiative Functional Diet Scale, a new functional outcome scale intended to capture the severity of oropharyngeal dysphagia, as represented by the degree of diet texture restriction recommended for the patient.
Participants assigned International Dysphagia Diet Standardisation Initiative Functional Diet Scale scores to 16 clinical cases. Consensual validity was measured against reference scores determined by an author reference panel. Interrater reliability was measured overall and across quartile subsets of the dataset. Criterion validity was evaluated versus Functional Oral Intake Scale (FOIS) scores assigned by survey respondents to the same case scenarios. Feedback was requested regarding ease and likelihood of use.
Web-based survey.
Respondents (N=170) from 29 countries.
Not applicable.
Consensual validity (percent agreement and Kendall τ), criterion validity (Spearman rank correlation), and interrater reliability (Kendall concordance and intraclass coefficients).
The International Dysphagia Diet Standardisation Initiative Functional Diet Scale showed strong consensual validity, criterion validity, and interrater reliability. Scenarios involving liquid-only diets, transition from nonoral feeding, or trial diet advances in therapy showed the poorest consensus, indicating a need for clear instructions on how to score these situations. The International Dysphagia Diet Standardisation Initiative Functional Diet Scale showed greater sensitivity than the FOIS to specific changes in diet. Most (>70%) respondents indicated enthusiasm for implementing the International Dysphagia Diet Standardisation Initiative Functional Diet Scale.
This initial validation study suggests that the International Dysphagia Diet Standardisation Initiative Functional Diet Scale has strong consensual and criterion validity and can be used reliably by clinicians to capture diet texture restriction and progression in people with dysphagia.
评估国际吞咽障碍饮食标准倡议功能性饮食量表的一致性有效性、评分者间信度和效标效度,该量表是一种新的功能结局量表,旨在通过推荐给患者的饮食质地限制程度来反映口咽吞咽障碍的严重程度。
参与者根据国际吞咽障碍饮食标准倡议功能性饮食量表为 16 个临床病例进行评分。一致性有效性通过与作者参考小组确定的参考评分进行测量。评分者间信度总体上以及数据集四分位子集上进行测量。效标效度通过调查受访者对相同病例场景的功能性口腔摄入量表(FOIS)评分进行评估。要求对其易用性和使用可能性提供反馈。
基于网络的调查。
来自 29 个国家的 170 名受访者。
无。
一致性有效性(百分比一致性和 Kendall τ)、效标效度(Spearman 等级相关)和评分者间信度(Kendall 一致性和组内相关系数)。
国际吞咽障碍饮食标准倡议功能性饮食量表显示出很强的一致性有效性、效标效度和评分者间信度。涉及液体饮食、非口服喂养的过渡或治疗中试验饮食进展的情况一致性最差,表明需要明确说明如何对这些情况进行评分。与 FOIS 相比,国际吞咽障碍饮食标准倡议功能性饮食量表对饮食的特定变化更敏感。大多数(>70%)受访者表示有兴趣实施国际吞咽障碍饮食标准倡议功能性饮食量表。
这项初步验证研究表明,国际吞咽障碍饮食标准倡议功能性饮食量表具有很强的一致性和效标效度,临床医生可以可靠地使用它来捕捉吞咽障碍患者的饮食质地限制和进展情况。