Coley Phyllis D, Endara María-José, Kursar Thomas A
Department of Biology, University of Utah, Salt Lake City, UT, 84112, USA.
Smithsonian Tropical Research Institute, Panama City, Republic of Panama.
Oecologia. 2018 Jun;187(2):361-376. doi: 10.1007/s00442-018-4080-z. Epub 2018 Feb 10.
We summarize work on a speciose Neotropical tree genus, Inga (Fabaceae), examining how interspecific variation in anti-herbivore defenses may have evolved, how defenses shape host choice by herbivores and how they might regulate community composition and influence species radiations. Defenses of expanding leaves include secondary metabolites, extrafloral nectaries, rapid leaf expansion, trichomes, and synchrony and timing of leaf production. These six classes of defenses are orthogonal, supporting independent evolutionary trajectories. Moreover, only trichomes show a phylogenetic signature, suggesting evolutionary lability in nearly all defenses. The interspecific diversity in secondary metabolite profiles does not arise from the evolution of novel compounds, but from novel combinations of common compounds, presumably due to changes in gene regulation. Herbivore host choice is determined by plant defensive traits, not host phylogeny. Neighboring plants escape each other's pests if their defenses differ enough, thereby enforcing the high local diversity typical of tropical forests. Related herbivores feed on hosts with similar defenses, implying that there are phylogenetic constraints placed on the herbivore traits that are associated with host use. Divergence in defensive traits among Inga appears to be driven by herbivore pressure. However, the lack of congruence between herbivore and host phylogeny suggests that herbivores are tracking defenses, choosing hosts based on traits for which they already have adaptations. There is, therefore, an asymmetry in the host-herbivore evolutionary arms race.
我们总结了关于一个物种丰富的新热带树属——印加树属(豆科)的研究工作,研究了抗食草动物防御的种间变异可能是如何进化的,防御如何塑造食草动物的宿主选择,以及它们如何调节群落组成并影响物种辐射。正在展开的叶片的防御机制包括次生代谢产物、花外蜜腺、叶片快速展开、毛状体以及叶片产生的同步性和时间。这六类防御机制相互独立,支持了独立的进化轨迹。此外,只有毛状体显示出系统发育特征,这表明几乎所有防御机制在进化上都具有不稳定性。次生代谢产物谱中的种间多样性并非源于新化合物的进化,而是源于常见化合物的新组合,推测是由于基因调控的变化。食草动物的宿主选择由植物的防御特征决定,而非宿主的系统发育。如果相邻植物的防御差异足够大,它们就能避免相互遭受害虫侵害,从而维持了热带森林典型的高局部多样性。相关的食草动物以具有相似防御机制的宿主为食,这意味着与宿主利用相关的食草动物特征存在系统发育限制。印加树属植物防御特征的差异似乎是由食草动物压力驱动的。然而,食草动物和宿主系统发育之间缺乏一致性表明,食草动物是在追踪防御机制,根据它们已经适应的特征来选择宿主。因此,在宿主 - 食草动物的进化军备竞赛中存在不对称性。