1 Institute of Nursing and Health Research, Ulster University, UK.
2 Marie Curie Hospice, Glasgow, UK.
Palliat Med. 2018 May;32(5):930-938. doi: 10.1177/0269216317752515. Epub 2018 Feb 12.
Constipation is an important issue for patients receiving palliative care within specialist palliative care settings. Questions and ambiguity, however, persist about international best practice and management.
To synthesise the current evidence base on the assessment and management of constipation for palliative care patients within a specialist palliative care setting.
This is a systematic review.
MEDLINE, Embase, CINAHL, Scopus and Cochrane databases were systematically searched in April 2017 for empirical studies, written in English, on the assessment and management of constipation in specialist palliative care settings, published between 2007 and 2017. Two researchers independently reviewed and critically appraised all studies, conducted data extraction, and undertook a thematic analysis.
In total, 13 studies were included in the review comprising randomised trials ( n = 3), observational ( n = 4) and descriptive studies ( n = 6). Most research was conducted in specialist palliative care units, targeting either healthcare professionals or patients. The analysis highlighted a lack of standard definition of constipation, raising questions on the existence and comparability of baseline prevalence figures, the physical and psychological impact on patients, resource impact on staff and service, the subjective and objective methods of assessing constipation, and key aspects of constipation management, including a lack of focus on non-pharmacological management in this setting.
The results of this review are being used to inform the development of an educational intervention targeting healthcare professionals. Gaps in the evidence base include lack of consistent definition of constipation, constipation prevention, non-pharmacological management, and the consideration of the management of constipation for the dying patient.
在专科姑息治疗环境中,便秘是接受姑息治疗的患者的一个重要问题。然而,关于国际最佳实践和管理,仍然存在疑问和模糊性。
综合当前在专科姑息治疗环境中姑息治疗患者便秘评估和管理的循证依据。
这是一项系统评价。
2017 年 4 月,系统检索了 MEDLINE、Embase、CINAHL、Scopus 和 Cochrane 数据库,以获取 2007 年至 2017 年期间发表的关于专科姑息治疗环境中便秘评估和管理的实证研究,这些研究均为英文撰写。两位研究人员独立地对所有研究进行了回顾和批判性评估、数据提取,并进行了主题分析。
共有 13 项研究纳入了综述,包括随机试验(n=3)、观察性研究(n=4)和描述性研究(n=6)。大多数研究都是在专科姑息治疗病房进行的,针对的是医疗保健专业人员或患者。分析结果突出了缺乏对便秘的标准定义,这引发了对基线患病率数据的存在和可比性的质疑,对患者的身体和心理影响,对员工和服务的资源影响,评估便秘的主观和客观方法,以及便秘管理的关键方面,包括在这种情况下缺乏对非药物管理的关注。
本综述的结果正被用于为针对医疗保健专业人员的教育干预提供信息。证据基础中的空白包括缺乏对便秘的一致定义、便秘预防、非药物管理以及对临终患者便秘管理的考虑。