Suppr超能文献

将常用手部治疗结果测量指标与国际功能、残疾和健康分类的各个领域联系起来:系统评价。

Linking commonly used hand therapy outcome measures to individual areas of the International Classification of Functioning: A systematic review.

机构信息

Hand Surgery Associates, Olyphant, PA, USA.

Orthopaedic Specialty Group PC, Fairfield, CT, USA.

出版信息

J Hand Ther. 2019 Apr-Jun;32(2):243-261. doi: 10.1016/j.jht.2017.11.039. Epub 2018 Feb 9.

Abstract

STUDY DESIGN

Systematic review.

INTRODUCTION

Identifying outcome measures that correspond to the International Classification of Functioning (ICF) provides insight into selecting appropriate outcome tools in hand therapy practice.

PURPOSE OF THE STUDY

The objective of this study is to systematically review patient-reported outcome measures commonly used in hand therapy to determine the extent to which the content represents the biopsychosocial view of the ICF.

METHODS

A comprehensive literature search was conducted. Studies that met inclusion criteria were identified, and outcome measures were extracted. The meaningful concept was determined for each item on the measure and linked to the most specific ICF category. Summary linkage calculations were completed.

RESULTS

Eleven patient-reported outcomes were identified from 43 included studies. Activity and participation had the highest content coverage followed by body functions. There was linking to personal factors and not defined-disability and mental health. Environmental factors were not represented in any of the included outcome measures. The core set representation of unique codes ranged from 8.55% to 18.80% (mean: 11.97%) for the Comprehensive ICF Core Set for Hand Conditions and from 30.43% to 47.83% (mean: 31.40%) for the Brief ICF Core Set for Hand Conditions. The percent representation of the Comprehensive ICF Core Set for Hand Conditions for unique disability ranged from 21.62% to 43.24% (mean: 20.33%) and from 62.50% to 87.50% (mean: 72.22%) for the Brief ICF Core Set for Hand Conditions.

DISCUSSION

None of the included measures represent all categories of the ICF Core Sets for Hand Conditions.

CONCLUSION

Utilizing the most recent refinement rules for the linking process, this study provides comparisons of measures along with clarity of content coverage for the most commonly used tools in the practice of hand therapy.

摘要

研究设计

系统评价。

简介

确定与国际功能、残疾和健康分类(ICF)相对应的结局测量指标,可以深入了解在手部治疗实践中选择合适的结局工具。

研究目的

本研究的目的是系统地回顾手部治疗中常用的患者报告结局测量指标,以确定其内容在多大程度上代表了 ICF 的生物心理社会观点。

方法

进行了全面的文献检索。确定了符合纳入标准的研究,并提取了结局测量指标。确定了测量指标中每一项的有意义概念,并将其与 ICF 最具体的类别相联系。完成了总结联系计算。

结果

从 43 项纳入研究中确定了 11 项患者报告结局。活动和参与的内容涵盖率最高,其次是身体功能。与个人因素和未定义的残疾和心理健康有关联,而环境因素则没有体现在任何纳入的结局测量指标中。独特代码的综合 ICF 核心集的代表性范围为 8.55%至 18.80%(平均值:11.97%),用于手部疾病的综合 ICF 核心集;简短 ICF 核心集用于手部疾病的代表性范围为 30.43%至 47.83%(平均值:31.40%)。综合 ICF 核心集用于手部疾病的独特残疾的代表性范围为 21.62%至 43.24%(平均值:20.33%),简短 ICF 核心集用于手部疾病的代表性范围为 62.50%至 87.50%(平均值:72.22%)。

讨论

没有一个纳入的措施代表手部疾病 ICF 核心集的所有类别。

结论

利用联系过程的最新细化规则,本研究提供了手部治疗实践中最常用工具的测量指标比较以及内容涵盖范围的清晰度。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验