Response: Commentary: Seeing the conflict: an attentional account of reasoning errors.
作者信息
Mata André, Ferreira Mário B
机构信息
Faculdade de Psicologia, CICPSI, Universidade de Lisboa, Lisbon, Portugal.
出版信息
Front Psychol. 2018 Jan 26;9:24. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2018.00024. eCollection 2018.
Abstract
摘要
相似文献
1
Response: Commentary: Seeing the conflict: an attentional account of reasoning errors.
Front Psychol. 2018 Jan 26;9:24. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2018.00024. eCollection 2018.
2
Commentary: Seeing the conflict: an attentional account of reasoning errors.
Front Psychol. 2017 Jul 25;8:1284. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2017.01284. eCollection 2017.
3
Seeing the conflict: an attentional account of reasoning errors.
Psychon Bull Rev. 2017 Dec;24(6):1980-1986. doi: 10.3758/s13423-017-1234-7.
4
What makes us think? A three-stage dual-process model of analytic engagement.
Cogn Psychol. 2015 Aug;80:34-72. doi: 10.1016/j.cogpsych.2015.05.001. Epub 2015 Jun 16.
5
The Negative Relationship between Reasoning and Religiosity Is Underpinned by a Bias for Intuitive Responses Specifically When Intuition and Logic Are in Conflict.
Front Psychol. 2017 Dec 19;8:2191. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2017.02191. eCollection 2017.
6
Are we good at detecting conflict during reasoning?
Cognition. 2012 Jul;124(1):101-6. doi: 10.1016/j.cognition.2012.04.004. Epub 2012 May 8.
7
The role of language comprehension in reasoning: how "good-enough" representations induce biases.
Cognition. 2014 Nov;133(2):457-63. doi: 10.1016/j.cognition.2014.07.011. Epub 2014 Aug 23.
8
Role of intuitive knowledge in the diagnostic reasoning of hospital specialists: a focus group study.
BMJ Open. 2019 Jan 28;9(1):e022724. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2018-022724.
9
Belief inhibition in children's reasoning: memory-based evidence.
J Exp Child Psychol. 2012 Jun;112(2):231-42. doi: 10.1016/j.jecp.2012.01.006. Epub 2012 Mar 7.
10
Individual differences in conflict detection during reasoning.
Q J Exp Psychol (Hove). 2018 May;71(5):1188-1208. doi: 10.1080/17470218.2017.1313283. Epub 2018 Jan 1.
引用本文的文献
1
The Bat-and-Ball Problem: Stronger evidence in support of a conscious error process.
Decision (Wash D C ). 2019 Oct;6(4):369-380. doi: 10.1037/dec0000107. Epub 2019 Mar 14.
本文引用的文献
1
The Influence of Effortful Thought and Cognitive Proficiencies on the Conjunction Fallacy: Implications for Dual-Process Theories of Reasoning and Judgment.
Pers Soc Psychol Bull. 2017 Jun;43(6):874-887. doi: 10.1177/0146167217700607. Epub 2017 Apr 20.
2
Commentary: Seeing the conflict: an attentional account of reasoning errors.
Front Psychol. 2017 Jul 25;8:1284. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2017.01284. eCollection 2017.
3
Individual differences in conflict detection during reasoning.
Q J Exp Psychol (Hove). 2018 May;71(5):1188-1208. doi: 10.1080/17470218.2017.1313283. Epub 2018 Jan 1.
4
Seeing the conflict: an attentional account of reasoning errors.
Psychon Bull Rev. 2017 Dec;24(6):1980-1986. doi: 10.3758/s13423-017-1234-7.
5
Analytic and heuristic processes in the detection and resolution of conflict.
Mem Cognit. 2016 Oct;44(7):1050-63. doi: 10.3758/s13421-016-0618-7.
6
The time course of conflict on the Cognitive Reflection Test.
Cognition. 2016 May;150:109-18. doi: 10.1016/j.cognition.2016.01.015. Epub 2016 Feb 17.
7
The Doubting System 1: Evidence for automatic substitution sensitivity.
Acta Psychol (Amst). 2016 Feb;164:56-64. doi: 10.1016/j.actpsy.2015.12.008. Epub 2015 Dec 23.
8
Who can escape the natural number bias in rational number tasks? A study involving students and experts.
Br J Psychol. 2016 Aug;107(3):537-55. doi: 10.1111/bjop.12161. Epub 2015 Nov 14.
9
What makes us think? A three-stage dual-process model of analytic engagement.
Cogn Psychol. 2015 Aug;80:34-72. doi: 10.1016/j.cogpsych.2015.05.001. Epub 2015 Jun 16.
10
Highly reflective reasoners show no signs of belief inhibition.
Acta Psychol (Amst). 2015 Jan;154:69-76. doi: 10.1016/j.actpsy.2014.11.008. Epub 2014 Dec 10.
Zotero 插件