Primavesi Florian, Swierczynski Stefan, Klieser Eckhard, Kiesslich Tobias, Jäger Tarkan, Urbas Romana, Hutter Jörg, Neureiter Daniel, Öfner Dietmar, Stättner Stefan
Department of Visceral, Transplant and Thoracic Surgery, Center of Operative Medicine, Medical University Innsbruck, A-6020 Innsbruck, Austria.
Department of Surgery, Paracelsus Medical University, A-5020 Salzburg, Austria.
Oncol Lett. 2018 Mar;15(3):2913-2920. doi: 10.3892/ol.2017.7634. Epub 2017 Dec 18.
Radiofrequency ablation (RFA) and microwave ablation (MWA) are currently the dominant modalities to treat unresectable liver tumors. Monitoring the ablation process with b-mode-sonography is often hampered by artefacts. Furthermore, vessels may cause cooling in the adjacent tumor target (heat-sink-effect) with risk of local recurrence. The present study evaluated infrared-thermography to monitor surgical RFA/MWA and detect heat-sink-effects in real-time. RFA and MWA of perfused porcine livers was conducted at peripheral and central-vessel-adjacent locations, and monitored by real-time thermography. Ablation was measured and evaluated by gross pathology. The mean time for ablation was significantly longer in RFA compared with MWA (8 vs. 2 min). Although mean macroscopic ablation diameter was similar (RFA, 3.17 cm; MWA, 3.38 cm), RFA showed a significant heat-sink-effect compared with MWA. The surface temperature during central RFA near vessels was 1/3 lower compared with peripheral RFA (47.11±8.35°C vs. 68.72±12.70°C; P<0.001). There was no significant difference in MWA (50.52±8.35°C vs. 50.18±10.35°C; P=0.74). In conclusion, thermography is suitable to monitor the correct ablation with MWA and RFA. The results of the current study demonstrated a significant heat-sink-effect for RFA, but not MWA near vessels. MWA reaches consistent surface temperatures much faster than RFA. With further validation, thermography may be useful to ensure appropriate ablation particularly near vulnerable or vascular structures.
射频消融(RFA)和微波消融(MWA)是目前治疗不可切除性肝肿瘤的主要方式。用B超监测消融过程常受伪像干扰。此外,血管可能导致邻近肿瘤靶点冷却(热沉效应),存在局部复发风险。本研究评估了红外热成像技术,以监测手术中的RFA/MWA并实时检测热沉效应。在灌注猪肝的外周和靠近中央血管的位置进行RFA和MWA,并通过实时热成像进行监测。通过大体病理学测量和评估消融情况。与MWA相比,RFA的平均消融时间明显更长(8分钟对2分钟)。尽管平均宏观消融直径相似(RFA为3.17厘米;MWA为3.38厘米),但与MWA相比,RFA显示出明显的热沉效应。靠近血管的中央RFA期间的表面温度比外周RFA低1/3(47.11±8.35°C对68.72±12.70°C;P<0.001)。MWA则无显著差异(50.52±8.35°C对50.18±10.35°C;P=0.74)。总之,热成像技术适用于监测MWA和RFA的正确消融。本研究结果表明,RFA存在明显的热沉效应,而靠近血管的MWA则没有。MWA达到一致表面温度的速度比RFA快得多。经过进一步验证,热成像技术可能有助于确保特别是在易损或血管结构附近进行适当的消融。