Li Jing-Xiu, Li Yang, Yan Shu-Jun, Han Bai-He, Song Zhao-Yan, Song Wei, Liu Shi-Hao, Guo Ji-Wei, Yin Shuo, Chen Ye-Ping, Xia De-Jun, Li Xin, Li Xue-Qi, Jin En-Ze
Department of Cardiology, The Fourth Affiliated Hospital of Harbin Medical University, Harbin, Heilongjiang 150001, P.R. China.
Department of Cardiology, Harbin First Hospital, Harbin, Heilongjiang 150001, P.R. China.
Biomed Rep. 2018 Feb;8(2):138-147. doi: 10.3892/br.2017.1036. Epub 2017 Dec 29.
A challenge for antithrombotic treatment is patients who present with atrial fibrillation (AF) and acute coronary syndrome, particularly in patients who have undergone coronary percutaneous intervention with stenting (PCIS). In the present study, a total of nine observational trials published prior to July 2017 that investigated the effects of dual antiplatelet therapy (DAPT; aspirin + clopidogrel) and triple oral antithrombotic therapy (TOAT; DAPT + warfarin) among patients with AF concurrent to PCIS were collected from the Medline, Cochrane and Embase databases and conference proceedings of cardiology, gastroenterology and neurology meetings. A meta-analysis was performed using fixed- or random-effect models according to heterogeneity. The subgroups were also analyzed on the occurrence of major adverse cardiac events (MACE), stroke and bleeding events in the two treatment groups. Analysis of baseline characteristics indicated that there was no significant difference in the history of coexistent disease or conventional therapies between the DAPT and TOAT groups. The primary end point incidence was 2,588 patients in the DAPT group (n=13,773) and 871 patients in the TOAT group (n=5,262) following pooling of all nine trials. There was no statistically significant difference in the incidence of primary end points between the DAPT and TOAT groups. Odds ratio (OR)=0.96, 95% confidence interval (CI)=0.73-1.27, P=0.79, with heterogeneity between trials (I=82%, P<0.00001). Subsequently, on subgroup analysis, the results indicated no increased risk of major bleeding or ischemic stroke in the DAPT or TOAT group. However, compared with the TOAT group, there was an apparent increased risk of MACE plus ischemic stroke in the DAPT group (OR=1.62, 95% CI=1.43-1.83, P<0.00001) with heterogeneity between trials (I=70%, P=0.01). In conclusion, the present meta-analysis suggests that TOAT (aspirin + clopidogrel + warfarin) therapy for patients with AF concurrent to PCIS significantly reduced the risk of MACE and stroke compared with DAPT (aspirin + clopidogrel) therapy. Further randomized controlled clinical trials are required to confirm the efficacy of the optimal antithrombotic therapy in patients with AF following PCIS.
抗血栓治疗面临的一个挑战是患有心房颤动(AF)和急性冠状动脉综合征的患者,尤其是那些接受了冠状动脉支架植入术(PCIS)的患者。在本研究中,从Medline、Cochrane和Embase数据库以及心脏病学、胃肠病学和神经学会议的会议记录中收集了2017年7月之前发表的总共9项观察性试验,这些试验调查了双联抗血小板治疗(DAPT;阿司匹林+氯吡格雷)和三联口服抗血栓治疗(TOAT;DAPT+华法林)对并发PCIS的AF患者的影响。根据异质性,使用固定效应或随机效应模型进行荟萃分析。还对两个治疗组中主要不良心脏事件(MACE)、中风和出血事件的发生情况进行了亚组分析。基线特征分析表明,DAPT组和TOAT组在并存疾病史或传统治疗方面没有显著差异。在汇总所有9项试验后,DAPT组(n=13773)的主要终点发生率为2588例患者,TOAT组(n=5262)为871例患者。DAPT组和TOAT组之间的主要终点发生率没有统计学上的显著差异。优势比(OR)=0.96,95%置信区间(CI)=0.73-1.27,P=0.79,试验间存在异质性(I=82%,P<0.00001)。随后,在亚组分析中,结果表明DAPT组或TOAT组中主要出血或缺血性中风的风险没有增加。然而,与TOAT组相比,DAPT组中MACE加缺血性中风的风险明显增加(OR=1.62,95%CI=1.43-1.83,P<0.00001),试验间存在异质性(I=70%,P=0.01)。总之,本荟萃分析表明,对于并发PCIS的AF患者,与DAPT(阿司匹林+氯吡格雷)治疗相比,TOAT(阿司匹林+氯吡格雷+华法林)治疗显著降低了MACE和中风的风险。需要进一步的随机对照临床试验来证实最佳抗血栓治疗对PCIS后AF患者的疗效。