Suppr超能文献

EAES 分类法在腹腔镜手术中的术中不良事件。

EAES classification of intraoperative adverse events in laparoscopic surgery.

机构信息

Department of General Surgery, Yeovil District Hospital NHS Foundation Trust, Higher Kingston, Yeovil, BA21 4AT, UK.

Faculty of Science, University of Bath, Wessex House 3.22, Bath, BA2 7AY, UK.

出版信息

Surg Endosc. 2018 Sep;32(9):3822-3829. doi: 10.1007/s00464-018-6108-1. Epub 2018 Feb 12.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

Surgical outcomes are traditionally evaluated by post-operative data such as histopathology and morbidity. Although these outcomes are reported using accepted systems, their ability to influence operative performance is limited by their retrospective application. Interest in direct measurement of intraoperative events is growing but no available systems applicable to routine practice exist. We aimed to develop a structured, practical method to report intraoperative adverse events enacted during minimal access surgical procedures.

METHODS

A structured mixed methodology approach was adopted. Current intraoperative adverse event reporting practices and desirable system characteristics were sought through a survey of the EAES executive. The observational clinical human reliability analysis method was applied to a series of laparoscopic total mesorectal excision (TME) case videos to identify intraoperative adverse events. In keeping with survey results, observed events were further categorised into non-consequential and consequential, which were further subdivided into four levels based upon the principle of therapy required to correct the event. A second survey phase explored usability, acceptability, face and content validity of the novel classification.

RESULTS

217 h of TME surgery were analysed to develop and continually refine the five-point hierarchical structure. 34 EAES expert surgeons (69%) responded. The lack of an accepted system was the main barrier to routine reporting. Simplicity, reproducibility and clinical utility were identified as essential requirements. The observed distribution of intraoperative adverse events was 60.1% grade I (non-consequential), 37.1% grade II (minor corrective action), 2.4% grade III (major correction or change in post-operative care) and 0.1% grade IV (life threatening). 84% agreed with the proposed classification (Likert scale 4.04) and 92% felt it was applicable to their practice and incorporated all desirable characteristics.

CONCLUSION

A clinically applicable intraoperative adverse event classification, which is acceptable to expert surgeons, is reported and complements the objective assessment of minimal access surgical performance.

摘要

背景

传统上,手术结果通过术后数据(如组织病理学和发病率)进行评估。尽管这些结果是使用公认的系统报告的,但由于其回顾性应用,它们影响手术绩效的能力有限。对直接测量术中事件的兴趣日益增加,但目前尚无适用于常规实践的可用系统。我们旨在开发一种结构化、实用的方法来报告微创外科手术过程中的术中不良事件。

方法

采用结构化混合方法。通过对 EAES 执行委员会进行调查,寻求当前术中不良事件报告实践和理想系统特征。应用观察性临床人为可靠性分析方法对一系列腹腔镜全直肠系膜切除术 (TME) 病例视频进行分析,以识别术中不良事件。根据调查结果,观察到的事件进一步分为非后果性和后果性,然后根据纠正事件所需的治疗原则进一步细分为四个级别。第二阶段调查探索了新型分类的可用性、可接受性、表面和内容有效性。

结果

分析了 217 小时的 TME 手术,以开发和不断完善五级分层结构。34 名 EAES 专家外科医生(69%)做出了回应。缺乏公认的系统是常规报告的主要障碍。简单性、可重复性和临床实用性被确定为基本要求。观察到的术中不良事件分布为 60.1%为 I 级(非后果性),37.1%为 II 级(轻微纠正措施),2.4%为 III 级(主要纠正或术后护理改变),0.1%为 IV 级(危及生命)。84%的人同意提出的分类(Likert 量表 4.04),92%的人认为该分类适用于他们的实践并包含了所有理想的特征。

结论

报告了一种可应用于临床的术中不良事件分类,该分类得到了专家外科医生的认可,补充了微创外科手术绩效的客观评估。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验