Suppr超能文献

先天性畸形导致的婴儿死亡:儿童死亡概述面板数据的新用途。

Infant deaths from congenital anomalies: novel use of Child Death Overview Panel data.

机构信息

Bradford Royal Infirmary, Neonatal Unit, Bradford, UK.

School of Medicine, University of Leeds, Leeds, UK.

出版信息

Arch Dis Child. 2018 Nov;103(11):1027-1032. doi: 10.1136/archdischild-2017-314256. Epub 2018 Feb 7.

Abstract

OBJECTIVE

We aimed to assess Child Death Overview Panel (CDOP) data validity, and cause of death classification, by comparison with information from a local birth cohort study (Born in Bradford, BiB), and another cause of death coding system (causes of death and associated conditions-CODAC). We then aimed to use CDOP data to calculate ethnic-specific infant mortality rates (IMRs), and compare characteristics of infants who died of congenital anomalies (CA) with those who died from other causes (non-CA).

DESIGN

Retrospective cohort study.

SETTING

Bradford Metropolitan District.

PATIENTS

All infant deaths, 2008 to 2013.

MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES

Infant mortality rates from CA and non-CA causes.

RESULTS

315 infant deaths were included, 56 of whom were BiB recruits. Agreement between CDOP and BiB was moderate to perfect for all characteristics except ethnicity, which showed weak agreement (kappa=0.58). The same deaths (27/56) were classified as CA by CDOP and CODAC. IMRs (per 1000 live births, 2009-2013) were highest in Pakistani infants (all causes 9.8, CA cause 5.5) compared with white British (all causes 4.3, CA cause 1.3) and other infants (all causes 5.1, CA cause 1.4). In multivariate analysis, infants who died of CA cause were more likely to have been born at term (OR 3.18) and to consanguineous parents (OR 3.28) than infants who died of non-CA cause.

CONCLUSIONS

Excess Pakistani mortality appears to be partly explained by an excess of deaths from CA, which in this population appears associated with a greater prevalence of consanguinity.

摘要

目的

通过与当地出生队列研究(布拉德福德出生,BiB)和另一个死因编码系统(死因和相关情况-CODAC)的信息进行比较,评估儿童死亡概述小组(CDOP)数据的有效性和死因分类。然后,我们旨在使用 CDOP 数据计算特定族裔的婴儿死亡率(IMR),并比较死于先天性异常(CA)和其他原因(非-CA)的婴儿的特征。

设计

回顾性队列研究。

地点

布拉德福德都会区。

患者

2008 年至 2013 年所有婴儿死亡。

主要观察指标

CA 和非-CA 病因所致婴儿死亡率。

结果

共纳入 315 例婴儿死亡,其中 56 例为 BiB 招募。除种族外,CDOP 与 BiB 的所有特征均具有中度至完全一致,种族仅显示弱一致(kappa=0.58)。CDOP 和 CODAC 将相同的死亡(27/56)归类为 CA。2009-2013 年,巴基斯坦婴儿的所有病因(IMR9.8,CA 病因 5.5)和非 CA 病因(IMR4.3,CA 病因 1.3)的 IMR 均高于白种英国婴儿(所有病因 4.3,CA 病因 1.3)和其他婴儿(所有病因 5.1,CA 病因 1.4)。在多变量分析中,死于 CA 病因的婴儿更有可能足月出生(OR3.18)和父母为近亲结婚(OR3.28),而死于非 CA 病因的婴儿则不然。

结论

巴基斯坦婴儿死亡率过高,部分原因是 CA 死亡率过高,而在该人群中,CA 似乎与近亲结婚的发生率较高有关。

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验