Suppr超能文献

胼胝体抑制在中风后运动恢复中的潜在双重作用。

The potential dual role of transcallosal inhibition in post-stroke motor recovery.

作者信息

Bertolucci Federica, Chisari Carmelo, Fregni Felipe

机构信息

Department of Neuroscience, Unit of Neurorehabilitation, University Hospital of Pisa, Italy.

Neuromodulation Center, Spaulding Rehabilitation Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, USA.

出版信息

Restor Neurol Neurosci. 2018;36(1):83-97. doi: 10.3233/RNN-170778.

Abstract

Up to now, the mechanism of motor impairment and recovery after stroke has been thought to be based on the interhemispheric competition model. According to this model, which assumes that suppressing the excitability of contralesional hemisphere will enhance recovery by reducing transcallosal inhibition (TCI) of the stroke hemisphere, many clinical trials used non-invasive brain stimulation to improve motor function. Despite some positive findings, meta-analysis shows an important source of variability in the results, questioning whether the interhemispheric competition model would be exhaustive enough to explain the positive results or whether other mechanisms could explain the motor effects of inhibitory stimulation in the contralesional hemisphere. The goal of this study was to review the relationship between increased TCI and motor impairment after stroke.A systematic review of clinical studies investigating TCI through transcranial magnetic stimulation (TMS) in stroke patients and the relationship of this metric with motor recovery was then performed. After a literary search in PubMed eleven articles were included. The potential role of several covariates was examined and discussed.Overall, the importance of TCI as a putative mechanism for stimulation of the contralesional hemisphere seems to depend on the baseline motor function. In other words, from evidence coming mostly from chronic patients, modulation of abnormal TCI seems to be useful for patients with good motor function and less important in patients with poor motor function. TCI seems to be negatively correlated with mirror movements of the paretic hand. It can be inferred that suppressing the activity of the contralesional hemisphere could be beneficial for patients with good residual motor function and strong TCI, but not for those with poor motor function and weak TCI. Baseline motor function and measure of TCI should be taken into account for stratification of patients in clinical trials and for the design of customized treatment.

摘要

到目前为止,人们一直认为中风后运动功能障碍及恢复的机制是基于半球间竞争模型。根据该模型,假定抑制对侧半球的兴奋性将通过减少中风半球的胼胝体间抑制(TCI)来促进恢复,许多临床试验采用非侵入性脑刺激来改善运动功能。尽管有一些阳性结果,但荟萃分析显示结果存在重要的变异性来源,这让人质疑半球间竞争模型是否足以全面解释阳性结果,或者其他机制是否可以解释对侧半球抑制性刺激的运动效应。本研究的目的是回顾中风后TCI增加与运动功能障碍之间的关系。随后对通过经颅磁刺激(TMS)研究中风患者TCI的临床研究以及该指标与运动恢复的关系进行了系统综述。在PubMed上进行文献检索后,纳入了11篇文章。研究并讨论了几个协变量的潜在作用。总体而言,TCI作为刺激对侧半球的一种假定机制的重要性似乎取决于基线运动功能。换句话说,从主要来自慢性病患者的证据来看,调节异常的TCI似乎对运动功能良好的患者有用,而对运动功能较差的患者不太重要。TCI似乎与患侧手的镜像运动呈负相关。可以推断,抑制对侧半球的活动可能对残余运动功能良好且TCI较强的患者有益,但对运动功能差且TCI较弱的患者则不然。在临床试验中对患者进行分层以及设计定制治疗时,应考虑基线运动功能和TCI测量值。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验