Department of Oncology, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD, USA; Department of Urology, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD, USA.
Department of Urology, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD, USA.
Eur Urol. 2018 Aug;74(2):218-225. doi: 10.1016/j.eururo.2018.01.035. Epub 2018 Feb 10.
Inherited DNA-repair gene mutations are more prevalent in men with advanced prostate cancer than previously thought, but their clinical implications are not fully understood.
To investigate the clinical significance of germline DNA-repair gene alterations in men with metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer (mCRPC) receiving next-generation hormonal therapy (NHT), with a particular emphasis on BRCA/ATM mutations.
DESIGN, SETTING, AND PARTICIPANTS: We interrogated 50 genes for pathogenic or likely pathogenic germline mutations using leukocyte DNA from 172 mCRPC patients beginning treatment with first-line NHT with abiraterone or enzalutamide.
We assessed the impact of germline DNA-repair gene mutation status on ≥50% and ≥90% PSA responses, PSA progression-free survival (PSA-PFS), clinical/radiologic progression-free survival (PFS), and overall survival (OS). Survival outcomes were adjusted using propensity score-weighted multivariable Cox regression analyses.
Among 172 mCRPC patients included, germline mutations (in any DNA-repair gene) were found in 12% (22/172) of men, and germline BRCA/ATM mutations specifically in 5% (9/172) of men. In unadjusted analyses, outcomes to first-line NHT were better in men with germline BRCA/ATM mutations (vs no mutations) with respect to PSA-PFS (hazard ratio [HR] 0.47; p=0.061), PFS (HR 0.50; p=0.090), and OS (HR 0.28; p=0.059). In propensity score-weighted multivariable analyses, outcomes were superior in men with germline BRCA/ATM mutations with respect to PSA-PFS (HR 0.48, 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.25-0.92; p=0.027), PFS (HR 0.52, 95% CI 0.28-0.98; p=0.044), and OS (HR 0.34, 95% CI 0.12-0.99; p=0.048), but not in men with non-BRCA/ATM germline mutations (all p>0.10). These results require prospective validation, and our conclusions are limited by the small number of patients (n=9) with BRCA/ATM mutations.
Outcomes to first-line NHT appear better in mCRPC patients harboring germline BRCA/ATM mutations (vs no mutations), but not for patients with other non-BRCA/ATM germline mutations.
Patients with metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer and harboring germline mutations in BRCA1/2 and ATM benefit from treatment with abiraterone and enzalutamide.
与先前的认知相比,在患有晚期前列腺癌的男性中,遗传 DNA 修复基因突变更为常见,但这些基因突变的临床意义尚未完全了解。
研究在接受下一代激素治疗(NHT)的转移性去势抵抗性前列腺癌(mCRPC)男性中,种系 DNA 修复基因突变的临床意义,特别强调 BRCA/ATM 突变。
设计、设置和参与者:我们使用 172 名开始接受一线 NHT 治疗的 mCRPC 患者的白细胞 DNA,对 50 个基因进行了致病性或可能致病性的种系基因突变检测,这些患者接受阿比特龙或恩扎鲁胺治疗。
我们评估了种系 DNA 修复基因突变状态对≥50%和≥90%PSA 反应、PSA 无进展生存期(PSA-PFS)、临床/放射学无进展生存期(PFS)和总生存期(OS)的影响。使用倾向评分加权多变量 Cox 回归分析调整生存结果。
在纳入的 172 名 mCRPC 患者中,12%(22/172)的男性存在种系基因突变(任何 DNA 修复基因),5%(9/172)的男性存在种系 BRCA/ATM 突变。在未调整的分析中,与无突变相比,BRCA/ATM 种系突变的男性在一线 NHT 后的 PSA-PFS(风险比 [HR]0.47;p=0.061)、PFS(HR0.50;p=0.090)和 OS(HR0.28;p=0.059)方面的结局更好。在倾向评分加权多变量分析中,与无突变相比,BRCA/ATM 种系突变的男性 PSA-PFS(HR0.48,95%置信区间 [CI]0.25-0.92;p=0.027)、PFS(HR0.52,95% CI0.28-0.98;p=0.044)和 OS(HR0.34,95% CI0.12-0.99;p=0.048)的结局更好,但非 BRCA/ATM 种系突变的男性结局无差异(所有 p>0.10)。这些结果需要前瞻性验证,我们的结论受到患者数量较少(n=9)的限制。
与无突变相比,一线 NHT 后,BRCA/ATM 种系突变的 mCRPC 患者的结局似乎更好,但其他非 BRCA/ATM 种系突变的患者则不然。
患有转移性去势抵抗性前列腺癌且携带 BRCA1/2 和 ATM 种系突变的患者受益于阿比特龙和恩扎鲁胺治疗。