Babu Anna Serene, Manju V, Gopal Vinod Kumar
Department of Prosthodontics, Amrita School of Dentistry, Kochi, Kerala, India.
Department of Mechanical Engineering, Amrita School of Dentistry, Kochi, Kerala, India.
Indian J Dent Res. 2018 Jan-Feb;29(1):67-73. doi: 10.4103/ijdr.IJDR_272_16.
Maxillofacial prostheses need frequent refabrication due to degradation of color and deterioration of physical properties of the elastomer.
This study attempted to evaluate the change in color stability, Shore A hardness, and surface roughness of two maxillofacial silicones, A-2186 and Cosmesil M511, when submitted to chemical disinfection and accelerated aging.
This was a comparative in vitro study.
The materials included two silicone elastomers - A-2186 and Cosmesil M511 (Factor II Incorporated) - functional intrinsic red pigment and three disinfectants - Fittydent tablet, chlorhexidine gluconate 4%, and neutral soap. The specimens in each group of elastomer were evaluated initially for color, hardness, and surface roughness, which were further divided into subgroups and subjected to disinfection and accelerated aging. The evaluation of color was performed with the help of an ultraviolet reflectance spectrophotometer. Shore A hardness was evaluated using a durometer and surface roughness, with a digital roughness tester followed by scanning electron microscopy analysis.
: Analysis of variance and Tukey's multiple comparison test were used for statistical analysis.
Accelerated aging caused a significant decrease in color, increase in Shore A hardness, and variation in surface roughness in both silicone elastomer groups. Chemical disinfection presented significant changes in color and surface roughness whereas no significant effect on Shore hardness, irrespective of the disinfectant used.
The maxillofacial silicone elastomers presented deterioration in color, hardening, and significant variations in surface roughness when subjected to chemical disinfection and accelerated aging, which provides a valid baseline for future research.
由于弹性体颜色退化和物理性能恶化,颌面修复体需要频繁重新制作。
本研究试图评估两种颌面硅橡胶A - 2186和Cosmesil M511在进行化学消毒和加速老化时,其颜色稳定性、邵氏A硬度和表面粗糙度的变化。
这是一项体外对比研究。
材料包括两种硅橡胶弹性体——A - 2186和Cosmesil M511(Factor II Incorporated公司)、功能性固有红色颜料以及三种消毒剂——Fittydent片剂、4%葡萄糖酸氯己定和中性肥皂。每组弹性体标本最初评估其颜色、硬度和表面粗糙度,然后进一步分成亚组并进行消毒和加速老化处理。借助紫外反射分光光度计进行颜色评估。使用硬度计评估邵氏A硬度,使用数字粗糙度测试仪评估表面粗糙度,随后进行扫描电子显微镜分析。
方差分析和Tukey多重比较检验用于统计分析。
加速老化导致两个硅橡胶弹性体组的颜色显著降低、邵氏A硬度增加以及表面粗糙度变化。化学消毒导致颜色和表面粗糙度出现显著变化,而无论使用何种消毒剂,对邵氏硬度均无显著影响。
颌面硅橡胶弹性体在进行化学消毒和加速老化时,颜色变差、变硬且表面粗糙度有显著变化,这为未来研究提供了有效的基线。