Department of Public Health, University of Otago, New Zealand.
Genealogist, New Zealand.
Aust N Z J Public Health. 2018 Apr;42(2):175-179. doi: 10.1111/1753-6405.12765. Epub 2018 Feb 14.
As relatively little is known about how socioeconomic position might have affected health prior to the Second World War, we aimed to study lifespan by occupational class in two cohorts in New Zealand.
The first study included men on the electoral rolls in Dunedin in the period 1893 to 1902. The second study used an established cohort of male military personnel who were recruited for the First World War. Linear regression was used to estimate lifespan by occupational class.
The first study of 259 men on the electoral rolls found no substantive lifespan differences between the high and low occupational class groups. But the second study of 2,406 military personnel found that men in the three highest occupational classes lived 3.5 years longer (95%CI: 0.3-6.8 years) than the three lowest classes (in the multivariable analysis adjusting for age in 1918 and rurality of occupation).
We found no significant lifespan differences in one cohort, but a second cohort is the earliest demonstration to our knowledge of substantial differences in mortality by socioeconomic position in this country prior to the 1960s. Implications for public health: This study provides historical context to the long-term efforts to address health inequalities in society.
由于在第二次世界大战之前,人们对社会经济地位如何影响健康知之甚少,我们旨在通过新西兰的两个队列研究职业阶层对寿命的影响。
第一项研究包括了 1893 年至 1902 年期间达尼丁选举名单上的男性。第二项研究使用了一个已建立的男性军事人员队列,他们是为第一次世界大战招募的。使用线性回归来估计职业阶层的寿命。
第一项研究对选举名单上的 259 名男性进行了研究,发现高职业阶层和低职业阶层之间的寿命没有实质性差异。但第二项研究对 2406 名军事人员进行了研究,发现三个最高职业阶层的男性比三个最低职业阶层的男性寿命长 3.5 年(95%CI:0.3-6.8 年)(在调整了 1918 年年龄和职业农村性别的多变量分析中)。
我们在一个队列中没有发现显著的寿命差异,但第二个队列是我们所知的在 20 世纪 60 年代之前这个国家社会经济地位对死亡率的显著差异的最早证明。对公共卫生的影响:这项研究为长期努力解决社会中的健康不平等问题提供了历史背景。