• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

葡萄牙健康素养简短评估(SAHL):一种自我管理工具的开发与验证

Short Assessment of Health Literacy (SAHL) in Portugal: development and validation of a self-administered tool.

作者信息

Pires Carla, Rosa Pedro, Vigário Marina, Cavaco Afonso

机构信息

Researcher, Department of Social Pharmacy, Faculty of Pharmacy, University of Lisbon, Lisbon, Portugal.

Auxiliary Professor, School of Psychology and Life Sciences, Lusophone University of Humanities and Technologies, Lisbon, Portugal.

出版信息

Prim Health Care Res Dev. 2018 Feb 15;20:e51. doi: 10.1017/S1463423618000087.

DOI:10.1017/S1463423618000087
PMID:29444735
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC7008398/
Abstract

The goal of this study was to adapt, improve and validate a short, self-administered health literacy assessment tool for European Portuguese-speaking adults. Health literacy tools are of great importance to health authorities and professionals, as low or inadequate health literacy, that is, a limited capacity to handle health-related information, is associated with higher morbidity and mortality. The 18-item Short Assessment of Health Literacy for Brazilian Portuguese-speaking adults (SAHLPA-18) was adapted into European Portuguese. The European Portuguese tool (SAHLPA-23) includes five additional items. The SAHLPA-23 was tested in a convenience sample of 503 participants from two Portuguese regions. Socio-demographic data, literacy and cognitive indicators were collected. Participants also completed a questionnaire on comprehension of written health materials. Construct validity was assessed through correlations between SAHLPA-23 scores and education, literacy, and cognitive variables and score on the comprehension questionnaire. The psychometric properties of the new tool were compared with those of the SAHLPA-18. The mean SAHLPA-18 and SAHLPA-23 scores were 13.9 (77.2%; SD=2.9) and 18.3 (79.6%; SD=3.8), respectively. Both tools showed adequate reliability (Cronbach's α>0.7). SAHLPA-23 was more highly correlated with all study variables than SAHLPA-18. Although both instruments displayed acceptable discriminative power, SAHLPA-23 had better accuracy than SAHLPA-18 (DeLong's method: ΔAUC=0.09, Z=3.36; P<0.001). The SAHLPA-23 is an independent, feasible and innovative tool for estimation of health literacy in the Portuguese adult population.

摘要

本研究的目的是改编、改进并验证一种针对欧洲葡萄牙语成年人的简短、自我管理的健康素养评估工具。健康素养工具对卫生当局和专业人员非常重要,因为健康素养低或不足,即处理与健康相关信息的能力有限,与较高的发病率和死亡率相关。针对巴西葡萄牙语成年人的18项健康素养简短评估工具(SAHLPA - 18)被改编为欧洲葡萄牙语版本。欧洲葡萄牙语工具(SAHLPA - 23)增加了五个项目。SAHLPA - 23在来自葡萄牙两个地区的503名参与者的便利样本中进行了测试。收集了社会人口统计学数据、识字和认知指标。参与者还完成了一份关于书面健康材料理解的问卷。通过SAHLPA - 23得分与教育、识字、认知变量以及理解问卷得分之间的相关性来评估结构效度。将新工具的心理测量特性与SAHLPA - 18的进行了比较。SAHLPA - 18和SAHLPA - 23的平均得分分别为13.9(77.2%;标准差 = 2.9)和18.3(79.6%;标准差 = 3.8)。两种工具都显示出足够的可靠性(Cronbach's α>0.7)。SAHLPA - 23与所有研究变量的相关性都比SAHLPA - 18更高。尽管两种工具都显示出可接受的区分能力,但SAHLPA - 23比SAHLPA - 18具有更好的准确性(DeLong方法:ΔAUC = 0.09,Z = 3.36;P<0.001)。SAHLPA - 23是一种用于评估葡萄牙成年人群健康素养的独立、可行且创新的工具。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/fec4/7008398/31452014a464/S1463423618000087_fig3.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/fec4/7008398/587f11ff143e/S1463423618000087_fig1.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/fec4/7008398/b706d1bb6a6e/S1463423618000087_fig2.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/fec4/7008398/31452014a464/S1463423618000087_fig3.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/fec4/7008398/587f11ff143e/S1463423618000087_fig1.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/fec4/7008398/b706d1bb6a6e/S1463423618000087_fig2.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/fec4/7008398/31452014a464/S1463423618000087_fig3.jpg

相似文献

1
Short Assessment of Health Literacy (SAHL) in Portugal: development and validation of a self-administered tool.葡萄牙健康素养简短评估(SAHL):一种自我管理工具的开发与验证
Prim Health Care Res Dev. 2018 Feb 15;20:e51. doi: 10.1017/S1463423618000087.
2
Validation of the Short Assessment of Health Literacy in Portuguese-speaking Adults in Portugal.葡萄牙语成年人健康素养简易评估量表在葡萄牙的验证。
Gac Sanit. 2020 Sep-Oct;34(5):435-441. doi: 10.1016/j.gaceta.2019.03.005. Epub 2019 May 31.
3
Short Assessment of Health Literacy for Portuguese-speaking Adults.简易健康素养评估-葡萄牙语版
Rev Saude Publica. 2012 Aug;46(4):702-11. doi: 10.1590/s0034-89102012005000047. Epub 2012 Jul 10.
4
Short Assessment of Health Literacy-Spanish and English: a comparable test of health literacy for Spanish and English speakers.简短健康素养评估-西班牙语和英语版:西班牙语和英语使用者健康素养的可比测试。
Health Serv Res. 2010 Aug;45(4):1105-20. doi: 10.1111/j.1475-6773.2010.01119.x. Epub 2010 May 24.
5
The Nutrition Literacy Assessment Instrument for Brazilians, NLit-Br: An Exploratory Cross-Cultural Validity Study.《巴西营养素养评估工具 NLit-Br:一项探索性跨文化效度研究》。
Nutrients. 2022 Nov 20;14(22):4914. doi: 10.3390/nu14224914.
6
A short assessment of health literacy (SAHL) in the Netherlands.荷兰的健康素养简短评估(SAHL)
BMC Public Health. 2014 Sep 23;14:990. doi: 10.1186/1471-2458-14-990.
7
Concordance between two instruments for health literacy assessment.两种健康素养评估工具的一致性。
Epidemiol Serv Saude. 2021;30(2):e2020490. doi: 10.1590/S1679-49742021000200004.
8
Evaluating Health Literacy among Adolescent and Young Adult Pregnant Women from a Low-Income Area of Northeast Brazil.评估来自巴西东北部低收入地区的青少年和年轻孕妇的健康素养。
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2020 Nov 27;17(23):8806. doi: 10.3390/ijerph17238806.
9
Translation and Validation of the "7-Item Eustachian Tube Dysfunction Questionnaire" to European Portuguese (PT).《“7项咽鼓管功能障碍问卷”》翻译成欧洲葡萄牙语(PT)及效度验证
Acta Med Port. 2020 Mar 2;33(3):191-197. doi: 10.20344/amp.11783.
10
Linguistic adaptation and psychometric evaluation of original Oral Health Literacy-Adult Questionnaire (OHL-AQ).原始口腔健康素养-成人问卷(OHL-AQ)的语言改编及心理测量学评估。
J Adv Med Educ Prof. 2016 Oct;4(4):163-169.

引用本文的文献

1
A Systematic Review of Health Literacy Measurement Instruments in Portugal.葡萄牙健康素养测量工具的系统评价
Port J Public Health. 2022 Sep 9;40(3):172-187. doi: 10.1159/000525890. eCollection 2023 Feb.
2
The Nutrition Literacy Assessment Instrument for Brazilians, NLit-Br: An Exploratory Cross-Cultural Validity Study.《巴西营养素养评估工具 NLit-Br:一项探索性跨文化效度研究》。
Nutrients. 2022 Nov 20;14(22):4914. doi: 10.3390/nu14224914.
3
Measuring health literacy: A systematic review and bibliometric analysis of instruments from 1993 to 2021.
测量健康素养:1993 年至 2021 年工具的系统评价和文献计量分析。
PLoS One. 2022 Jul 15;17(7):e0271524. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0271524. eCollection 2022.
4
What is the Prevalence of Low Health Literacy in European Union Member States? A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis.欧盟成员国健康素养低的流行率是多少?系统评价和荟萃分析。
J Gen Intern Med. 2021 Mar;36(3):753-761. doi: 10.1007/s11606-020-06407-8. Epub 2021 Jan 5.
5
Validation of a new tool for evaluating subjects' satisfaction with medicine package leaflets: a cross-sectional descriptive study.一种评估受试者对药品说明书满意度的新工具的验证:一项横断面描述性研究。
Sao Paulo Med J. 2019 Sep-Oct;137(5):454-462. doi: 10.1590/1516-3180.2019.0123160919.