Rismanchi Mojtaba, Borhani-Haghighi Afshin
Clinical Neurology Research Center, Shiraz University of Medical Sciences, Shiraz, Iran.
Department of Neurology, Shiraz University of Medical Sciences, Shiraz, Iran.
J Vasc Interv Neurol. 2017 Dec;9(6):45-50.
The purpose of this study was to compare the frequency of microembolic brain infarcts after direct navigation method versus exchange method in carotid artery stenting and vertebral artery origin angioplasty.
This is a prospective study conducted at Shiraz University of Medical Sciences in southern Iran. Consecutive patients undergoing "carotid angioplasty and stenting" and "vertebral artery origin stenting" were randomly assigned into two groups with "direct navigation method" and "exchange method." Subsequently, postprocedural magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) including diffusion weighted imaging and apparent diffusion coefficient were obtained within the first 24 hours after completion of the procedure.
In total, 89 patients were recruited (67% male, mean age: 72 years). Cases comprised of 38 left internal carotid arteries (ICAs), 38 right ICAs, 6 left vertebral artery origin, and 7 right vertebral artery origin. Forty patients underwent exchange method, while 49 underwent direct navigation method. There was only one clinical stroke that occurred in "exchange method" group. Fifteen patients (37.5%) in exchange group and 23 patients (46.9%) in direct navigation group developed diffusion restricted lesions. In exchange group, 13 patients (32.5%) had at least one diffusion restricted lesion ipsilateral to the target vessel, and three patients (7.5%) had at least one diffusion restricted lesion contralateral to the target vessel. In direct navigation group, these measures were 19 (38.8%) and 9 (18.4%). However, no statistically significant intergroup differences were observed. The only significant difference was bilateral infarct percentile, which was more common in the direct navigation method (0.032).
Diffusion restricted lesions were more common in the direct navigation method, both ipsilateral and contralateral to the target vessel, and in both carotid and vertebral artery study subgroups. However, differences were not statistically significant.
本研究的目的是比较在颈动脉支架置入术和椎动脉起始部血管成形术中,直接导航法与交换法术后微栓塞性脑梗死的发生率。
这是一项在伊朗南部设拉子医科大学进行的前瞻性研究。连续接受“颈动脉血管成形术和支架置入术”及“椎动脉起始部支架置入术”的患者被随机分为“直接导航法”和“交换法”两组。随后,在手术完成后的头24小时内进行术后磁共振成像(MRI)检查,包括弥散加权成像和表观扩散系数测定。
共纳入89例患者(男性占67%,平均年龄:72岁)。病例包括38条左侧颈内动脉(ICA)、38条右侧ICA、6条左侧椎动脉起始部和7条右侧椎动脉起始部。40例患者采用交换法,49例采用直接导航法。“交换法”组仅发生1例临床卒中。交换组15例患者(37.5%)和直接导航组23例患者(46.9%)出现弥散受限病变。交换组中,13例患者(32.5%)在靶血管同侧至少有1个弥散受限病变,3例患者(7.5%)在靶血管对侧至少有1个弥散受限病变。直接导航组中,这两个比例分别为19例(38.8%)和9例(18.4%)。然而,组间未观察到统计学显著差异。唯一显著差异是双侧梗死百分比,在直接导航法中更为常见(0.032)。
在直接导航法中,无论是在靶血管同侧还是对侧,以及在颈动脉和椎动脉研究亚组中,弥散受限病变都更为常见。然而,差异无统计学意义。