Pengo Martino F, Czaban Marcin, Berry Marc P, Nirmalan Prajeshan, Brown Richard, Birdseye Adam, Woroszyl Asia, Chapman Julia, Kent Brian D, Hart Nicholas, Rossi Gian Paolo, Steier Joerg
Guy's and St Thomas' NHS Foundation Trust, Lane Fox Respiratory Unit/Sleep Disorders Centre, London, UK.
Department of Medicine (DIMED), University of Padua, Padua, Italy.
J Thorac Dis. 2018 Jan;10(Suppl 1):S160-S169. doi: 10.21037/jtd.2017.07.110.
Continuous positive airway pressure (CPAP), the best available treatment for obstructive sleep apnea (OSA), requires long-term compliance to be effective. Behavioral interventions may be used to improve adherence to CPAP. We aimed to investigate whether positive or negative message framing impacts on CPAP compliance in patients with OSA, when compared to standard care.
Consenting patients with confirmed OSA were randomly allocated to receive along with their CPAP either positively or negatively framed messages (Pos; Neg), or standard care (Con). Standardized motivational messages were read out to patients during an initial teaching session and through weekly telephone calls. Patients' compliance data were reviewed 2 and 6 weeks following CPAP initiation.
We randomized 112 patients to groups that were matched for age, BMI, and OSA severity. The positively framed group (Pos) showed greater CPAP usage after 2 weeks (total use 53.7±31.4 hours) as compared to the negatively framed and the control group (35.6±27.4 and 40.8±33.5 hours, P<0.05); however, no differences were seen at 6 weeks. There were more dropouts in the control group than in either framed groups (Pos n=5; Neg n=8; Con n=11; P<0.05).
Positively framed messages can improve CPAP adherence in patients with OSA in the short-term; however, strategies for implementing its long-term use need to be developed.
持续气道正压通气(CPAP)是治疗阻塞性睡眠呼吸暂停(OSA)的最佳可用方法,需要长期依从才能有效。行为干预可用于提高对CPAP的依从性。我们旨在研究与标准护理相比,积极或消极的信息框架是否会影响OSA患者对CPAP的依从性。
同意参与的确诊OSA患者被随机分配,在接受CPAP治疗的同时,接受积极或消极框架的信息(Pos;Neg),或标准护理(Con)。在初始教学环节以及每周的电话随访中,向患者宣读标准化的激励信息。在开始使用CPAP后的2周和6周,对患者的依从性数据进行评估。
我们将112例患者随机分组,各组在年龄、体重指数和OSA严重程度方面相匹配。与消极框架组和对照组相比,积极框架组(Pos)在2周后CPAP使用时间更长(总使用时间为53.7±31.4小时)(分别为35.6±27.4小时和40.8±33.5小时,P<0.05);然而,在6周时未观察到差异。对照组的退出人数多于任何一个框架组(Pos组n=5;Neg组n=8;Con组n=11;P<0.05)。
积极框架的信息可在短期内提高OSA患者对CPAP的依从性;然而,需要制定实施其长期使用的策略。