Werner-Lin Allison, Zaspel Lori, Carlson Mae, Mueller Rebecca, Walser Sarah A, Desai Ria, Bernhardt Barbara A
School of Social Policy and Practice, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania.
Department of History and Sociology of Science, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania.
Am J Med Genet A. 2018 Mar;176(3):578-588. doi: 10.1002/ajmg.a.38613.
Clinical genome and exome sequencing (CGES) may identify variants leading to targeted management of existing conditions. Yet, CGES often fails to identify pathogenic diagnostic variants and introduces uncertainties by detecting variants of uncertain significance (VUS) and secondary findings. This study investigated how families understand findings and adjust their perspectives on CGES. As part of NIH's Clinical Sequencing Exploratory Research Consortium, children were recruited from clinics at the Children's Hospital of Pennsylvania (CHOP) and offered exome sequencing. Primary pathogenic and possibly pathogenic, and some secondary findings were returned. Investigators digitally recorded results disclosure sessions and conducted 3-month follow up interviews with 10 adolescents and a parent. An interdisciplinary team coded all transcripts. Participants were initially disappointed with findings, yet reactions evolved within disclosure sessions and at 3-month interviews toward acceptance and satisfaction. Families erroneously expected, and prepared extensively, to learn about risk for common conditions. During disclosure sessions, parents and adolescents varied in how they monitored and responded to each others reactions. Several misinterpreted, or overestimated, the utility of findings to attribute meaning and achieve closure for the CGES experience. Participants perceived testing as an opportunity to improve disease management despite results that did not introduce new treatments or diagnoses. Future research may examine whether families experience cognitive dissonance regarding discrepancies between expectations and findings, and how protective buffering minimizes the burden of disappointment on loved ones. As CGES is increasingly integrated into clinical care providers must contend with tempering family expectations and interpretations of findings while managing complex medical care.
临床基因组和外显子组测序(CGES)可能会识别出导致对现有疾病进行针对性管理的变异。然而,CGES常常无法识别出致病性诊断变异,并且通过检测意义不明确的变异(VUS)和次要发现引入了不确定性。本研究调查了家庭如何理解研究结果并调整他们对CGES的看法。作为美国国立卫生研究院临床测序探索性研究联盟的一部分,从宾夕法尼亚儿童医院(CHOP)的诊所招募了儿童并提供外显子组测序。返回了主要致病性和可能致病性以及一些次要发现。研究人员对结果披露会议进行了数字记录,并对10名青少年和一名家长进行了为期3个月的随访访谈。一个跨学科团队对所有转录本进行了编码。参与者最初对研究结果感到失望,但在披露会议期间以及3个月的访谈中,他们的反应逐渐转变为接受和满意。家庭错误地期望并为此做了大量准备,以了解常见疾病的风险。在披露会议期间,家长和青少年在监测和回应彼此反应的方式上存在差异。有几个人误解或高估了研究结果的效用,以便赋予意义并为CGES经历画上句号。尽管结果没有带来新的治疗方法或诊断,但参与者将检测视为改善疾病管理的机会。未来的研究可以考察家庭是否会因期望与研究结果之间的差异而经历认知失调,以及保护性缓冲如何将失望对亲人的负担降至最低。随着CGES越来越多地融入临床护理,医疗服务提供者在管理复杂医疗护理的同时,必须应对调节家庭期望和对研究结果的解释。