• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

计划性血液透析优于腹膜透析的生存优势:一项队列研究。

Survival advantage of planned haemodialysis over peritoneal dialysis: a cohort study.

机构信息

Department of Public Health, Centre Paul Strauss, Strasbourg, France.

Department of Public Health, Strasbourg University Hospital, Strasbourg, France.

出版信息

Nephrol Dial Transplant. 2018 Aug 1;33(8):1411-1419. doi: 10.1093/ndt/gfy007.

DOI:10.1093/ndt/gfy007
PMID:29447408
Abstract

BACKGROUND

Previous studies comparing the outcomes in haemodialysis (HD) with those in peritoneal dialysis (PD) have yielded conflicting results.

METHODS

The aim of the study was to compare the survival of planned HD versus PD patients in a cohort of adult incident patients who started renal replacement therapy (RRT) between 2006 and 2008 in the nationwide REIN registry (Réseau Epidémiologie et Information en Néphrologie). Patients who started RRT in emergency or stopped RRT within 2 months were excluded. Adjusted Cox models, propensity score matching and marginal structural models (MSMs) were used to compensate for the lack of randomization and provide causal inference from longitudinal data with time-dependent treatments and confounders including transplant censorship, modality change over time and time-varying covariates.

RESULTS

Among a total of 13 767 dialysis patients, 13% were on PD at initiation of RRT and 87% were on HD. The median survival times were 53.5 months or 4.45 years and 38.6 months or 3.21 years for patients starting on HD and PD, respectively. Regardless of the model used, there was a consistent advantage in terms of survival for HD patients: hazard ratio (HR) 0.76 [95% confidence interval (95% CI) 0.69-0.84] with the Cox model using propensity score; HR 0.67 (95% CI 0.62-0.73) in the Cox model with censorship for each treatment change; and HR 0.82 (95% CI 0.69-0.97) with MSMs. However, MSMs tended to reduce the survival gap between PD and HD patients.

CONCLUSION

This large cohort study using various statistical methods to minimize the bias appears to demonstrate a better survival in planned HD than in PD.

摘要

背景

此前比较血液透析(HD)和腹膜透析(PD)治疗结果的研究得出了相互矛盾的结果。

方法

本研究旨在比较 2006 年至 2008 年期间全国范围内 REIN 登记处(Réseau Epidémiologie et Information en Néphrologie)中开始肾脏替代治疗(RRT)的成年新发病例患者中计划进行 HD 与 PD 治疗的患者的生存率。排除急诊开始 RRT 或在 2 个月内停止 RRT 的患者。使用调整后的 Cox 模型、倾向评分匹配和边际结构模型(MSM)来补偿缺乏随机分组,并提供具有时间依赖性治疗和混杂因素(包括移植审查、随时间改变的治疗方式和时变协变量)的纵向数据的因果推断。

结果

在总共 13767 名透析患者中,13%在开始 RRT 时接受 PD 治疗,87%接受 HD 治疗。开始 HD 和 PD 治疗的患者中位生存时间分别为 53.5 个月或 4.45 年和 38.6 个月或 3.21 年。无论使用哪种模型,HD 患者的生存优势都一致:使用倾向评分的 Cox 模型 HR 为 0.76(95%CI 0.69-0.84);在每种治疗方法改变时都进行审查的 Cox 模型 HR 为 0.67(95%CI 0.62-0.73);以及 MSMs 的 HR 为 0.82(95%CI 0.69-0.97)。然而,MSM 倾向于缩小 PD 和 HD 患者之间的生存差距。

结论

本研究使用多种统计方法来最大程度地减少偏倚,结果似乎表明计划进行 HD 治疗的患者生存率优于 PD 治疗。

相似文献

1
Survival advantage of planned haemodialysis over peritoneal dialysis: a cohort study.计划性血液透析优于腹膜透析的生存优势:一项队列研究。
Nephrol Dial Transplant. 2018 Aug 1;33(8):1411-1419. doi: 10.1093/ndt/gfy007.
2
Trends in dialysis modality choice and related patient survival in the ERA-EDTA Registry over a 20-year period.20 年间 ERA-EDTA 登记处透析模式选择的趋势及其与患者生存的关系。
Nephrol Dial Transplant. 2016 Jan;31(1):120-8. doi: 10.1093/ndt/gfv295. Epub 2015 Aug 26.
3
[REIN Report 2011--summary].[2011年肾脏疾病改善全球结果(KDIGO)报告——摘要]
Nephrol Ther. 2013 Sep;9 Suppl 1:S3-6. doi: 10.1016/S1769-7255(13)70036-1.
4
Dialysis outcomes in Colombia (DOC) study: a comparison of patient survival on peritoneal dialysis vs hemodialysis in Colombia.哥伦比亚透析结果(DOC)研究:哥伦比亚腹膜透析与血液透析患者生存率比较
Kidney Int Suppl. 2008 Apr(108):S165-72. doi: 10.1038/sj.ki.5002619.
5
Infants Requiring Maintenance Dialysis: Outcomes of Hemodialysis and Peritoneal Dialysis.需要维持性透析的婴儿:血液透析和腹膜透析的结果。
Am J Kidney Dis. 2017 May;69(5):617-625. doi: 10.1053/j.ajkd.2016.09.024. Epub 2016 Dec 10.
6
[Current peritoneal dialysis compared with haemodialysis: medium-term survival analysis of incident dialysis patients in the Canary Islands in recent years].[近年来加那利群岛新入透析患者的中期生存分析:当前腹膜透析与血液透析的比较]
Nefrologia. 2011;31(2):174-84. doi: 10.3265/Nefrologia.pre2011.Jan.10743.
7
Survival advantage of hemodialysis relative to peritoneal dialysis in patients with end-stage renal disease and congestive heart failure.终末期肾病合并充血性心力衰竭患者行血液透析相对腹膜透析的生存优势。
Kidney Int. 2011 Nov;80(9):970-977. doi: 10.1038/ki.2011.233. Epub 2011 Jul 20.
8
A propensity-matched comparison of hard outcomes in children on chronic dialysis.慢性透析患儿硬结局的倾向评分匹配比较。
Eur J Pediatr. 2018 Jan;177(1):117-124. doi: 10.1007/s00431-017-3040-7. Epub 2017 Nov 16.
9
High membrane transport status on peritoneal dialysis is not associated with reduced survival following transfer to haemodialysis.腹膜透析时的高膜转运状态与转为血液透析后的生存降低无关。
Nephrol Dial Transplant. 2007 Oct;22(10):3005-12. doi: 10.1093/ndt/gfm324. Epub 2007 Jun 2.
10
Impact of initial dialysis modality on the survival of patients with ESRD in eastern China: a propensity-matched study.中国东部地区初始透析模式对终末期肾病患者生存的影响:一项倾向评分匹配研究。
BMC Nephrol. 2020 Jul 29;21(1):310. doi: 10.1186/s12882-020-01909-3.

引用本文的文献

1
The Role of the Gut Microbiota in Complications among Hemodialysis Patients.肠道微生物群在血液透析患者并发症中的作用
Microorganisms. 2024 Sep 12;12(9):1878. doi: 10.3390/microorganisms12091878.
2
The Controversies of Coronary Artery Disease in End-Stage Kidney Disease Patients: A Narrative Review.终末期肾病患者冠状动脉疾病的争议:一项叙述性综述
Rev Cardiovasc Med. 2023 Jun 25;24(6):181. doi: 10.31083/j.rcm2406181. eCollection 2023 Jun.
3
Peritoneal dialysis versus haemodialysis for people commencing dialysis.腹膜透析与血液透析治疗开始透析的患者。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2024 Jun 20;6(6):CD013800. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD013800.pub2.
4
The effect of dialysis modality on annual mortality: A prospective cohort study.透析模式对年死亡率的影响:一项前瞻性队列研究。
Sci Rep. 2024 Jun 18;14(1):14035. doi: 10.1038/s41598-024-64914-8.
5
Effectiveness of psychoeducational interventions on psychological distress and health-related quality of life among patients with maintenance hemodialysis: a systematic review and meta-analysis.心理教育干预对维持性血液透析患者心理困扰和健康相关生活质量的影响:系统评价和荟萃分析。
Ren Fail. 2024 Dec;46(1):2331613. doi: 10.1080/0886022X.2024.2331613. Epub 2024 Apr 1.
6
Comparative analysis of patients' survival on hemodialysis vs. peritoneal dialysis and identification of factors associated with death.血液透析与腹膜透析患者生存的对比分析及死亡相关因素的识别。
J Bras Nefrol. 2023 Jan-Mar;45(1):8-16. doi: 10.1590/2175-8239-JBN-2021-0242en.
7
Peritoneal dialysis in Tunisia: complications, technique and patient's survival (twenty-seven years of experience in a single center).突尼斯的腹膜透析:并发症、技术和患者的生存(单中心 27 年经验)。
Pan Afr Med J. 2021 Jul 7;39:179. doi: 10.11604/pamj.2021.39.179.29354. eCollection 2021.
8
Returning to PD after kidney transplant failure is a valuable option.在肾移植失败后恢复腹膜透析是一个有价值的选择。
Int Urol Nephrol. 2022 May;54(5):1123-1126. doi: 10.1007/s11255-021-02980-x. Epub 2021 Sep 6.
9
Prevalence and Associated Factors of Frailty and Mortality in Patients with End-Stage Renal Disease Undergoing Hemodialysis: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.接受血液透析的终末期肾病患者衰弱和死亡的患病率及相关因素:一项系统评价和荟萃分析
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2021 Mar 27;18(7):3471. doi: 10.3390/ijerph18073471.
10
Hemodialysis vs Peritoneal Dialysis: Comparison of Net Survival in Incident Patients on Chronic Dialysis in Colombia.血液透析与腹膜透析:哥伦比亚慢性透析初治患者的净生存率比较
Can J Kidney Health Dis. 2021 Mar 1;8:2054358120987055. doi: 10.1177/2054358120987055. eCollection 2021.