Suppr超能文献

接受阿哌沙班或华法林治疗的心房颤动患者的经皮冠状动脉介入治疗和抗血小板治疗:来自 ARISTOTLE 试验的见解。

Percutaneous coronary intervention and antiplatelet therapy in patients with atrial fibrillation receiving apixaban or warfarin: Insights from the ARISTOTLE trial.

机构信息

Department of Medicine, Duke University School of Medicine, Durham, NC.

Department of Medicine, Duke University School of Medicine, Durham, NC; Duke Clinical Research Institute, Duke University School of Medicine, Durham, NC.

出版信息

Am Heart J. 2018 Mar;197:133-141. doi: 10.1016/j.ahj.2017.11.005. Epub 2017 Nov 10.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

We assessed antiplatelet therapy use and outcomes in patients undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) during the ARISTOTLE trial.

METHODS

Patients were categorized based on the occurrence of PCI during follow-up (median 1.8 years); PCI details and outcomes post-PCI are reported. Of the 18,201 trial participants, 316 (1.7%) underwent PCI (152 in apixaban group, 164 in warfarin group).

RESULTS

At the time of PCI, 84% (267) were on study drug (either apixaban or warfarin). Of these, 19% did not stop study drug during PCI, 49% stopped and restarted <5 days post-PCI, and 30% stopped and restarted >5 days post-PCI. At 30 days post-PCI, 35% of patients received dual -antiplatelet therapy (DAPT), 23% received aspirin only, and 13% received a P2Y inhibitor only; 29% received no antiplatelet therapy. Triple therapy (DAPT + oral anticoagulant [OAC]) was used in 21% of patients, 23% received OAC only, 15% received OAC plus aspirin, and 9% received OAC plus a P2Y inhibitor; 32% received antiplatelet agents without OAC. Post-PCI, patients assigned to apixaban versus warfarin had numerically similar rates of major bleeding (5.93 vs 6.73 events/100 patient-years; P = .95) and stroke (2.74 vs 1.84 events/100 patient-years; P = .62).

CONCLUSIONS

PCI occurred infrequently during follow-up. Most patients on study drug at the time of PCI remained on study drug in the peri-PCI period; 19% continued the study drug without interruption. Antiplatelet therapy use post-PCI was variable, although most patients received DAPT. Additional data are needed to guide the use of antithrombotics in patients undergoing PCI.

摘要

背景

我们评估了 ARISTOTLE 试验中接受经皮冠状动脉介入治疗(PCI)的患者的抗血小板治疗使用情况和结局。

方法

根据随访期间(中位时间 1.8 年)发生 PCI 的情况对患者进行分类;报告 PCI 细节和 PCI 后的结局。在 18201 名试验参与者中,有 316 名(1.7%)进行了 PCI(阿哌沙班组 152 名,华法林组 164 名)。

结果

在进行 PCI 时,84%(267 名)正在服用研究药物(阿哌沙班或华法林)。其中,19%的患者在 PCI 期间未停止研究药物,49%的患者在 PCI 后<5 天内停止并重新开始使用,30%的患者在 PCI 后>5 天内停止并重新开始使用。在 PCI 后 30 天,35%的患者接受了双联抗血小板治疗(DAPT),23%的患者仅接受阿司匹林治疗,13%的患者仅接受 P2Y 抑制剂治疗;29%的患者未接受抗血小板治疗。三联治疗(DAPT+口服抗凝剂[OAC])在 21%的患者中使用,23%的患者仅接受 OAC 治疗,15%的患者接受 OAC 加阿司匹林治疗,9%的患者接受 OAC 加 P2Y 抑制剂治疗;32%的患者接受了无 OAC 的抗血小板药物治疗。与华法林相比,接受阿哌沙班治疗的患者在 PCI 后主要出血(5.93 与 6.73 例/100 患者-年;P=.95)和卒中等事件发生率(2.74 与 1.84 例/100 患者-年;P=.62)无显著差异。

结论

在随访期间,PCI 发生率较低。在 PCI 时正在服用研究药物的大多数患者在 PCI 围手术期仍继续服用研究药物;19%的患者继续不间断地服用研究药物。PCI 后抗血小板治疗的使用情况各不相同,尽管大多数患者接受了 DAPT。需要更多的数据来指导接受 PCI 的患者使用抗血栓药物。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验