Urgences pédiatriques et maladies infectieuses, université de Lille, centre hospitalier régional universitaire (CHRU de Lille), 59000 Lille, France; Groupe de pathologie infectieuse pédiatrique (Paediatric Infectious Disease Group), France.
Urgences pédiatriques et maladies infectieuses, université de Lille, centre hospitalier régional universitaire (CHRU de Lille), 59000 Lille, France.
Med Mal Infect. 2018 May;48(3):193-201. doi: 10.1016/j.medmal.2018.01.007. Epub 2018 Feb 12.
To evaluate clinical practices for ESBL-producing urinary tract infection (UTI) in France.
We performed an observational, retrospective, cross-sectional, hospital-based study in 22 pediatric departments of university or secondary care hospitals. We collected data of the last five patients presenting with ESBL-producing UTI in 2012 and the physicians' therapeutic approach to two case vignettes of acute non-septic ESBL-producing pyelonephritis (7-month-old girl) and cystitis (30-month-old girl). The adequacy of the therapeutic decision was analyzed by a panel of independent infectious disease experts.
A total of 80 case patients of ESBL-producing UTI were collected: 54 with acute pyelonephritis (mean age: 28 months, female: 66%), of whom 98% received an intravenous ESBL-adapted antibiotic treatment and 55% a two-drug antibiotic therapy. Carbapenems were used in 56% of cases and aminoglycosides in 36%. Of the 26 cystitis patients (mean age: 5 years, female: 73%), 85% were treated with antibiotics, including three intravenously (carbapenems=2). For the case vignettes, physicians (n=85) would have treated the pyelonephritis patient with carbapenems (76%) and/or aminoglycosides (68%); 71% would have used a two-drug antibiotic treatment. The cystitis patient would have been treated intravenously by 29% of physicians; 8% would have used a two-drug antibiotic treatment, 16% would have prescribed carbapenems, and 11% aminoglycosides. Antibiotic treatments were deemed appropriate in 37% of cases.
Antimicrobial treatment for ESBL-producing UTI greatly varies, and carbapenems are excessively prescribed. Specific guidelines for ESBL infections are required.
评估法国产 ESBL 尿路感染(UTI)的临床实践。
我们在 22 家大学或二级保健医院的儿科病房进行了一项观察性、回顾性、横断面、基于医院的研究。我们收集了 2012 年最后 5 例产 ESBL 尿路感染患者的数据,以及医生对 2 例急性非脓毒症产 ESBL 肾盂肾炎(7 月龄女孩)和膀胱炎(30 月龄女孩)病例的治疗方法。一组独立的传染病专家分析了治疗决策的适当性。
共收集了 80 例产 ESBL 尿路感染的病例患者:54 例为急性肾盂肾炎(平均年龄:28 个月,女性:66%),其中 98%接受了静脉内 ESBL 适应抗生素治疗,55%接受了两药抗生素治疗。56%的病例使用了碳青霉烯类药物,36%使用了氨基糖苷类药物。26 例膀胱炎患者(平均年龄:5 岁,女性:73%)中,85%接受了抗生素治疗,包括 3 例静脉内治疗(碳青霉烯类=2)。对于病例描述,医生(n=85)将用碳青霉烯类(76%)和/或氨基糖苷类(68%)治疗肾盂肾炎患者;71%将使用两药抗生素治疗。29%的医生会对膀胱炎患者进行静脉内治疗;8%将使用两药抗生素治疗,16%将开碳青霉烯类药物,11%将开氨基糖苷类药物。37%的抗生素治疗被认为是合适的。
产 ESBL 尿路感染的抗菌治疗差异很大,碳青霉烯类药物的使用过多。需要针对 ESBL 感染制定具体的指南。