Grebely Jason, Feld Jordan J, Wyles David, Sulkowski Mark, Ni Liyun, Llewellyn Joe, Mir Heshaam M, Sajed Nika, Stamm Luisa M, Hyland Robert H, McNally John, Brainard Diana M, Jacobson Ira, Zeuzem Stefan, Bourlière Marc, Foster Graham, Afdhal Nezam, Dore Gregory J
The Kirby Institute, UNSW Sydney, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia.
Toronto Centre for Liver Disease, Toronto, Ontario, Canada.
Open Forum Infect Dis. 2018 Feb 9;5(2):ofy001. doi: 10.1093/ofid/ofy001. eCollection 2018 Feb.
Hepatitis C virus (HCV) direct-acting antiviral therapy is effective among people receiving opioid substitution therapy (OST), but studies are limited by small numbers of nongenotype 1 (GT1) patients. The aim of this study was to evaluate the treatment completion, adherence, SVR12, and safety of sofosbuvir-based therapies in HCV patients receiving and not receiving OST.
Ten phase 3 studies of sofosbuvir-based regimens included ION (ledipasvir/sofosbuvir ± ribavirin for 8, 12, or 24 weeks in GT1), ASTRAL (sofosbuvir/velpatasvir for 12 weeks in GT1-6), and POLARIS (sofosbuvir/velpatasvir and sofosbuvir/velpatasvir/voxilaprevir in GT1-6). Patients with clinically significant drug use (last 12 months) or noncannabinoids detected at screening were ineligible.
Among 4743 patients, 4% (n = 194) were receiving OST (methadone; n = 113; buprenorphine, n = 75; other, n = 6). Compared with those not receiving OST (n = 4549), those receiving OST (n = 194) were younger (mean age, 48 vs 54), more often male (73% vs 61%), GT3 (38% vs 17%), treatment-naïve (78% vs 65%), and cirrhotic (36% vs 23%). Among those receiving and not receiving OST, there was no significant difference in treatment completion (97% vs 99%, = .06), SVR12 (94% vs 97%, = .06), relapse (0.5% vs 2.1%, = .19), adverse events (78% vs 77%, = .79), or serious adverse events (3.6% vs 2.4%, = .24). There was no difference in SVR12 in patients with cirrhosis (99% vs 95%, = .25) or those with G3 (95% vs 95%, = .77) in those receiving OST. Among patients receiving OST, SVR12 was high among those receiving methadone (95%) and buprenorphine (96%).
Sofosbuvir-based therapies are effective and safe in patients receiving OST.
丙型肝炎病毒(HCV)直接抗病毒治疗在接受阿片类药物替代疗法(OST)的患者中有效,但研究受到非1型基因(GT1)患者数量较少的限制。本研究的目的是评估基于索磷布韦的疗法在接受和未接受OST的HCV患者中的治疗完成情况、依从性、持续病毒学应答12周(SVR12)及安全性。
10项基于索磷布韦方案的3期研究包括ION(在GT1中使用来迪派韦/索磷布韦±利巴韦林治疗8、12或24周)、ASTRAL(在GT1-6中使用索磷布韦/维帕他韦治疗12周)和POLARIS(在GT1-6中使用索磷布韦/维帕他韦和索磷布韦/维帕他韦/伏西瑞韦)。筛查时检测到有临床意义的药物使用(过去12个月内)或非大麻素类药物的患者不符合条件。
在4743例患者中,4%(n = 194)接受OST(美沙酮;n = 113;丁丙诺啡,n = 75;其他,n = 6)。与未接受OST的患者(n = 4549)相比,接受OST的患者(n = 194)更年轻(平均年龄48岁对54岁),男性比例更高(73%对61%),GT3比例更高(38%对17%),初治患者比例更高(78%对65%),肝硬化患者比例更高(36%对23%)。在接受和未接受OST的患者中,治疗完成率(97%对99%,P = 0.06)、SVR12(94%对97%,P = 0.06)、复发率(0.5%对2.1%,P = 0.19)、不良事件发生率(78%对77%,P = 0.79)或严重不良事件发生率(3.6%对2.4%,P = 0.24)均无显著差异。接受OST的肝硬化患者(99%对95%,P = 0.25)或GT3患者(95%对95%,P = 0.77)的SVR12无差异。在接受OST的患者中,接受美沙酮治疗的患者(95%)和接受丁丙诺啡治疗的患者(96%)的SVR12较高。
基于索磷布韦的疗法在接受OST的患者中有效且安全。