• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

用于多机器人控制的人机自动化交互:自动化辅助程度变化及个体差异对操作员绩效的影响。

Human-automation interaction for multiple robot control: the effect of varying automation assistance and individual differences on operator performance.

作者信息

Wright Julia L, Chen Jessie Y C, Barnes Michael J

机构信息

a U.S. Army Research Laboratory , Orlando , FL , USA.

b U.S. Army Research Laboratory , Ft. Huachuca , AZ , USA.

出版信息

Ergonomics. 2018 Aug;61(8):1033-1045. doi: 10.1080/00140139.2018.1441449. Epub 2018 Apr 3.

DOI:10.1080/00140139.2018.1441449
PMID:29451105
Abstract

In a human-automation interaction study, automation assistance level (AL) was investigated for its effects on operator performance in a dynamic, multi-tasking environment. Participants supervised a convoy of manned and unmanned vehicles traversing a simulated environment in three AL conditions, while maintaining situation awareness and identifying targets. Operators' situation awareness, target detection performance, workload and individual differences were evaluated. Results show increasing AL generally improved task performance and decreased perceived workload, however, differential effects due to operator spatial ability and perceived attentional control were found. Eye-tracking measures were useful in parsing out individual differences that subjective measures did not detect. At the highest AL, participants demonstrated potentially complacent behaviour, indicating task disengagement. Practitioner Summary: The effect of varying automation assistance level (AL) on operator performance on multiple tasks were examined in a within-subjects experiment. Findings indicated a moderate AL improved performance, while higher levels encouraged complacent behaviour. Effects due to individual differences suggest that effective AL depends on the underlying characteristics of the operator.

摘要

在一项人机交互研究中,研究了自动化辅助水平(AL)对动态多任务环境中操作员绩效的影响。参与者在三种AL条件下监督一队有人和无人驾驶车辆穿越模拟环境,同时保持态势感知并识别目标。评估了操作员的态势感知、目标检测性能、工作量和个体差异。结果表明,提高AL通常会改善任务绩效并降低感知工作量,然而,发现了由于操作员空间能力和感知注意力控制导致的差异效应。眼动追踪测量有助于剖析主观测量未检测到的个体差异。在最高AL水平下,参与者表现出潜在的自满行为,表明任务脱离。从业者总结:在一项被试内实验中,研究了不同自动化辅助水平(AL)对操作员多项任务绩效的影响。研究结果表明,适度的AL可提高绩效,而较高水平则会助长自满行为。个体差异的影响表明,有效的AL取决于操作员的潜在特征。

相似文献

1
Human-automation interaction for multiple robot control: the effect of varying automation assistance and individual differences on operator performance.用于多机器人控制的人机自动化交互:自动化辅助程度变化及个体差异对操作员绩效的影响。
Ergonomics. 2018 Aug;61(8):1033-1045. doi: 10.1080/00140139.2018.1441449. Epub 2018 Apr 3.
2
Supervisory control of multiple robots: effects of imperfect automation and individual differences.多机器人监管控制:不完美自动化和个体差异的影响。
Hum Factors. 2012 Apr;54(2):157-74. doi: 10.1177/0018720811435843.
3
Supervisory control of multiple robots in dynamic tasking environments.多机器人在动态任务环境中的监管控制。
Ergonomics. 2012;55(9):1043-58. doi: 10.1080/00140139.2012.689013. Epub 2012 Jun 7.
4
Level of automation effects on performance, situation awareness and workload in a dynamic control task.动态控制任务中自动化水平对绩效、态势感知和工作负荷的影响。
Ergonomics. 1999 Mar;42(3):462-92. doi: 10.1080/001401399185595.
5
Effects of imperfect automation and individual differences on concurrent performance of military and robotics tasks in a simulated multitasking environment.在模拟多任务环境中,不完善的自动化和个体差异对军事与机器人任务并发执行的影响。
Ergonomics. 2009 Aug;52(8):907-20. doi: 10.1080/00140130802680773.
6
Impact of automated decision aids on performance, operator behaviour and workload in a simulated supervisory control task.自动化决策辅助工具对模拟监管控制任务中的性能、操作人员行为和工作负荷的影响。
Ergonomics. 2009 May;52(5):512-23. doi: 10.1080/00140130802379129.
7
Overload and automation-dependence in a multi-UAS simulation: Task demand and individual difference factors.多无人机系统仿真中的过载和自动化依赖:任务需求和个体差异因素。
J Exp Psychol Appl. 2020 Jun;26(2):218-235. doi: 10.1037/xap0000248. Epub 2019 Oct 17.
8
The role of human-automation consensus in multiple unmanned vehicle scheduling.人机共识在多无人飞行器调度中的作用。
Hum Factors. 2010 Feb;52(1):17-27. doi: 10.1177/0018720810368674.
9
Designing for flexible interaction between humans and automation: delegation interfaces for supervisory control.设计人与自动化之间的灵活交互:监督控制的委托接口
Hum Factors. 2007 Feb;49(1):57-75. doi: 10.1518/001872007779598037.
10
Automation transparency: implications of uncertainty communication for human-automation interaction and interfaces.自动化透明度:不确定性沟通对人机交互和界面的影响。
Ergonomics. 2019 Mar;62(3):345-360. doi: 10.1080/00140139.2018.1547842. Epub 2019 Feb 5.

引用本文的文献

1
Supporting detection of hostile intentions: automated assistance in a dynamic decision-making context.支持敌意意图检测:动态决策环境中的自动化辅助。
Cogn Res Princ Implic. 2023 Nov 19;8(1):69. doi: 10.1186/s41235-023-00519-5.
2
Fostering Collective Intelligence in Human-AI Collaboration: Laying the Groundwork for COHUMAIN.在人机协作中培养集体智慧:为COHUMAIN奠定基础。
Top Cogn Sci. 2025 Apr;17(2):189-216. doi: 10.1111/tops.12679. Epub 2023 Jun 29.
3
Correlation Evaluation of Pilots' Situation Awareness in Bridge Simulations via Eye-Tracking Technology.
基于眼动追踪技术的桥梁模拟中飞行员情境意识的相关评估。
Comput Intell Neurosci. 2021 Dec 3;2021:7122437. doi: 10.1155/2021/7122437. eCollection 2021.
4
Human-Autonomy Teaming: A Review and Analysis of the Empirical Literature.人机协作:实证文献综述与分析。
Hum Factors. 2022 Aug;64(5):904-938. doi: 10.1177/0018720820960865. Epub 2020 Oct 22.
5
Towards Mixed-Initiative Human-Robot Interaction: Assessment of Discriminative Physiological and Behavioral Features for Performance Prediction.迈向混合式人机交互:用于性能预测的判别性生理和行为特征评估。
Sensors (Basel). 2020 Jan 5;20(1):296. doi: 10.3390/s20010296.