Berlin Institute of Technology, Berlin, Germany.
Ergonomics. 2009 May;52(5):512-23. doi: 10.1080/00140130802379129.
In studies reporting automation effects on overall system performance and on the operator, the methods used to measure workload often did not appropriately reflect the complexity of this construct. The present study addresses the impact of automation on operator workload and behaviour in process control fault management. Workload effects were assessed with subjective, cardiovascular and secondary task performance indicators. Interactions with the interface of the process control simulation directed at gathering information and controlling the system were recorded. Automation made operators more efficient, allowing faster fault management with less information sampling and control actions. Subjective workload ratings were significantly lower in the assisted conditions as compared to manual, which was not reflected in cardiovascular and secondary task measures. Participants' information sampling activity did not differ between medium and high level of automation. Results suggest that participants paid constantly high attention to their task even with highly automated support.
在报告自动化对整体系统性能和操作人员影响的研究中,用于测量工作量的方法往往不能恰当地反映出这一结构的复杂性。本研究探讨了自动化对过程控制故障管理中操作人员工作负荷和行为的影响。使用主观、心血管和次要任务绩效指标来评估工作负荷效应。记录了与旨在收集信息和控制系统的过程控制模拟界面的交互。自动化使操作人员更有效率,允许更快地进行故障管理,减少信息采样和控制操作。与手动操作相比,辅助条件下的主观工作负荷评定显著降低,但心血管和次要任务测量指标并未反映这一点。参与者在中高自动化水平下的信息采样活动没有差异。结果表明,即使有高度自动化的支持,参与者也始终高度关注他们的任务。