Yoshiga Yasuhiro, Shimizu Akihiko, Ueyama Takeshi, Ono Makoto, Fukuda Masakazu, Fumimoto Tomoko, Ishiguchi Hironori, Omuro Takuya, Kobayashi Shigeki, Yano Masafumi
Department of Medicine and Clinical Science, Yamaguchi University Graduate School of Medicine, Ube, Japan.
The Faculty of Health Sciences, Yamaguchi University Graduate School of Medicine, Ube, Japan.
J Cardiol. 2018 Aug;72(2):128-134. doi: 10.1016/j.jjcc.2018.01.004. Epub 2018 Feb 13.
An effective catheter ablation strategy, beyond pulmonary vein isolation (PVI), for persistent atrial fibrillation (AF) is necessary. Pulmonary vein (PV)-reconduction also causes recurrent atrial tachyarrhythmias. The effect of the PVI and additional effect of a superior vena cava (SVC) isolation (SVCI) was strictly evaluated.
Seventy consecutive patients with persistent AF who underwent a strict sequential ablation strategy targeting the PVs and SVC were included in this study. The initial ablation strategy was a circumferential PVI. A segmental SVCI was only applied as a repeat procedure when patients demonstrated no PV-reconduction.
After the initial procedure, persistent AF was suppressed in 39 of 70 (55.7%) patients during a median follow-up of 32 months. After multiple procedures, persistent AF was suppressed in 46 (65.7%) and 52 (74.3%) patients after receiving the PVI alone and PVI plus SVCI strategies, respectively. In 6 of 15 (40.0%) patients with persistent AF resistant to PVI, persistent AF was suppressed. The persistent AF duration independently predicted persistent AF recurrences after multiple PVI alone procedures [HR: 1.012 (95% confidence interval: 1.006-1.018); p<0.001] and PVI plus SVCI strategies [HR: 1.018 (95% confidence interval: 1.011-1.025); p<0.001]. A receiver-operating-characteristic analysis for recurrent persistent AF indicated an optimal cut-off value of 20 and 32 months for the persistent AF duration using the PVI alone and PVI plus SVCI strategies, respectively.
The outcomes of the PVI plus SVCI strategy were favorable for patients with shorter persistent AF durations. The initial SVCI had the additional effect of maintaining sinus rhythm in some patients with persistent AF resistant to PVI.
对于持续性心房颤动(AF),除肺静脉隔离(PVI)外,还需要一种有效的导管消融策略。肺静脉(PV)再传导也会导致复发性房性快速心律失常。本研究严格评估了PVI的效果以及上腔静脉(SVC)隔离(SVCI)的附加效果。
本研究纳入了70例连续接受针对PV和SVC的严格序贯消融策略的持续性AF患者。初始消融策略为环肺静脉隔离。仅当患者无PV再传导时,节段性SVCI才作为重复手术应用。
初始手术后,在中位随访32个月期间,70例患者中有39例(55.7%)的持续性AF得到抑制。多次手术后,单纯接受PVI策略和PVI加SVCI策略的患者中,持续性AF得到抑制的分别有46例(65.7%)和52例(74.3%)。在15例对PVI耐药的持续性AF患者中,有6例(40.0%)的持续性AF得到抑制。持续性AF持续时间独立预测了单纯多次PVI手术后[风险比(HR):1.012(95%置信区间:1.006 - 1.018);p<0.001]以及PVI加SVCI策略后[HR:1.018(95%置信区间:1.011 - 1.025);p<0.001]的持续性AF复发情况。对复发性持续性AF的受试者工作特征分析表明,单纯使用PVI策略和PVI加SVCI策略时,持续性AF持续时间的最佳截断值分别为20个月和32个月。
PVI加SVCI策略的结果对于持续性AF持续时间较短的患者较为有利。初始SVCI对一些对PVI耐药的持续性AF患者有维持窦性心律的附加效果。