Institute of Cardiovascular Sciences, University of Manchester, Education and Research Centre, University Hospital of South Manchester, Manchester, M23 9LT, UK; Department of Cardiothoracic Anaesthesia and Critical Care, University Hospital of South Manchester, Manchester, M23 9LT, UK.
Faculty of Biology, Medicine and Health, University Hospital of South Manchester, Manchester, M23 9LT, UK.
Br J Anaesth. 2018 Mar;120(3):509-516. doi: 10.1016/j.bja.2017.10.018. Epub 2017 Nov 24.
The Sepsis-3 guidelines diagnose sepsis based on organ dysfunction in patients with either proven or suspected infection. The objective of this study was to assess the incidence and outcomes of sepsis diagnosed using these guidelines in patients in a cardiac intensive care unit (CICU) after cardiac surgery.
Daily sequential organ failure assessment (SOFA) scores were calculated for 2230 consecutive adult cardiac surgery patients between January 2013 and May 2015. Patients with an increase in SOFA score of ≥2 and suspected or proven infection were identified. The length of CICU stay, 30-day mortality and 2-yr survival were compared between groups. Multivariable linear regression, multivariable logistic regression, and Cox proportional hazards regression were used to adjust for possible confounders.
Sepsis with suspected or proven infection was diagnosed in 104 (4.7%) and 107 (4.8%) patients, respectively. After adjustment for confounding variables, sepsis with suspected infection was associated with an increased length of CICU stay of 134.1h (95% confidence interval (CI) 99.0-168.2, P<0.01) and increased 30-day mortality risk (odds ratio 3.7, 95% CI 1.1-10.2, P=0.02). Sepsis with proven infection was associated with an increased length of CICU stay of 266.1h (95% CI 231.6-300.7, P<0.01) and increased 30-day mortality risk (odds ratio 6.6, 95% CI 2.6-15.7, P<0.01).
Approximately half of sepsis diagnoses were based on proven infection and half on suspected infection. Patients diagnosed with sepsis using the Sepsis-3 guidelines have significantly worse outcomes after cardiac surgery. The Sepsis-3 guidelines are a potentially useful tool in the management of sepsis following cardiac surgery.
Sepsis-3 指南基于有明确或疑似感染的患者的器官功能障碍来诊断败血症。本研究的目的是评估在心脏手术后入住心脏重症监护病房(CICU)的患者中,使用这些指南诊断败血症的发病率和结局。
在 2013 年 1 月至 2015 年 5 月期间,对 2230 例连续成年心脏手术患者进行了每日序贯器官衰竭评估(SOFA)评分计算。确定 SOFA 评分增加≥2 且疑似或明确感染的患者。比较两组患者的 CICU 住院时间、30 天死亡率和 2 年生存率。使用多变量线性回归、多变量逻辑回归和 Cox 比例风险回归来调整可能的混杂因素。
分别诊断出 104 例(4.7%)和 107 例(4.8%)疑似或明确感染的败血症患者。在调整混杂变量后,疑似感染性败血症与 CICU 住院时间延长 134.1 小时(95%置信区间(CI)99.0-168.2,P<0.01)和 30 天死亡率风险增加(比值比 3.7,95%CI 1.1-10.2,P=0.02)相关。确诊感染性败血症与 CICU 住院时间延长 266.1 小时(95%CI 231.6-300.7,P<0.01)和 30 天死亡率风险增加(比值比 6.6,95%CI 2.6-15.7,P<0.01)相关。
大约一半的败血症诊断基于明确感染,另一半基于疑似感染。使用 Sepsis-3 指南诊断败血症的患者在心脏手术后的结局明显更差。Sepsis-3 指南可能是心脏手术后管理败血症的有用工具。