Suppr超能文献

对近距离放疗在高危前列腺癌治疗中作用的意见两极分化:北美泌尿生殖系统专家放疗肿瘤学家的调查。

Dramatically Polarized Opinion on the Role of Brachytherapy Boost in Management of High-risk Prostate Cancer: A Survey of North American Genitourinary Expert Radiation Oncologists.

机构信息

Department of Radiation Medicine, Oregon Health and Science University, Portland, OR.

Department of Radiation Oncology, University of California at Los Angeles, Los Angeles, CA.

出版信息

Clin Genitourin Cancer. 2018 Jun;16(3):e543-e545. doi: 10.1016/j.clgc.2018.01.001. Epub 2018 Feb 2.

Abstract

INTRODUCTION

Three randomized clinical trials have established brachytherapy (BT) boost in combination with external beam radiation therapy (EBRT) and androgen deprivation therapy (ADT) as superior to definitive EBRT and ADT alone in terms of biochemical control (but not overall survival) at the expense of increased toxicity in men with high-risk (HR) prostate cancer (PCa). The current view regarding these 2 treatment algorithms among North American genitourinary (GU) experts is not known.

METHODS

A survey was distributed to 88 practicing North American GU physicians serving on decision-making committees of cooperative group research organizations. Questions pertained to opinions regarding BT as monotherapy for low-risk PCa and BT boost for HR PCa. Responders were asked to self-identify as BT experts versus non-experts. Treatment recommendations were correlated with practice patterns using the Fisher exact test.

RESULTS

Forty-two radiation oncologists completed the survey, of whom 23 (55%) recommend EBRT and ADT alone and 19 (45%) recommend addition of BT boost. Twenty-five participants (60%) identified themselves as BT experts. Nearly 90% of those recommending BT boost were BT experts versus approximately 10% of non-BT experts (P < .001). Responders who recommended BT monotherapy as first-choice treatment for low-risk PCa were more likely to recommend BT boost for HR PCa (P < .0001).

CONCLUSIONS

There is a dramatic polarization in opinions regarding incorporation of BT boost into EBRT + ADT therapy for patients with HR PCa among North American GU radiation oncology experts, who serve on decision-making committees and influence the national treatment guidelines and future clinical trials. Those who identify themselves as BT experts are significantly more likely to recommend BT boost. These findings are likely to influence the national guidelines and implementation of BT boost in current and future North American PCa clinical studies.

摘要

简介

三项随机临床试验已经证实,近距离放射治疗(BT)联合外照射放射治疗(EBRT)和雄激素剥夺治疗(ADT)在生化控制方面优于单纯 EBRT 和 ADT,从而改善了高危(HR)前列腺癌(PCa)患者的预后(但对总生存率无影响),但同时也增加了毒性[1-3]。目前北美泌尿生殖系统(GU)专家对这两种治疗方案的看法尚不清楚。

方法

我们向 88 名在合作组研究组织决策委员会任职的北美 GU 医生发放了一份调查问卷。问卷内容涉及对 BT 作为低危 PCa 单一疗法以及 BT 增敏治疗 HR PCa 的看法。调查对象被要求自我认定为 BT 专家或非专家。采用 Fisher 确切检验将治疗建议与实践模式相关联。

结果

42 名放射肿瘤学家完成了调查,其中 23 名(55%)建议单独采用 EBRT 和 ADT,19 名(45%)建议采用 EBRT 和 ADT 加 BT 增敏[4,5]。25 名参与者(60%)自认为是 BT 专家。建议 BT 增敏治疗的专家中,近 90%是 BT 专家,而非 BT 专家中只有约 10%(P<0.001)[6,7]。建议 BT 作为低危 PCa 一线治疗的应答者更有可能建议将 BT 增敏用于 HR PCa(P<0.0001)[8,9]。

结论

在北美 GU 放射肿瘤学专家中,对将 BT 增敏应用于 HR PCa 的 EBRT+ADT 治疗存在显著的两极分化意见,他们担任决策委员会成员并影响国家治疗指南和未来的临床试验[10,11]。自我认定为 BT 专家的人更有可能建议使用 BT 增敏。这些发现可能会影响国家指南以及 BT 增敏在当前和未来北美 PCa 临床研究中的应用。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验